The relationship between mastery learning models and academic achievement in mathematics

Cristina Vlădescu

doi:10.29333/iejme/13705

Full Text (PDF)

Cristina Vlădescu ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, ROMANIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims at highlighting the relationship between mastery learning models and academic performance in mathematics, moderated by the number of hours allotted to studying mathematics. There are 305 first to eighth-grade students who learn at Nae A. Ghica Middle School in Romania. Students in sixth, seventh, and eighth grades (n=101) were selected to participate in this research because they study both algebra and geometry. We have used purposive sampling to control certain variables, i.e., mastery learning strategies and academic performance. The data were analyzed in Jamovi (2022). The level of performance was measured according to the progress students made. Data analysis revealed that the moderation effect of the time each student allocated to studying mathematics individually is not statistically significant in the relationship between the mastery learning model and academic performance in mathematics. This study was conducted on a small number of students, so it is recommended to be expanded on a larger scale.

Keywords

efficient learning
mastery learning
progress

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, 2023, Volume 18, Issue 4, Article No: em0751

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13705

Publication date: 01 Oct 2023

Online publication date: 19 Sep 2023

Article Views: 683

Article Downloads: 656

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Andersen, S. C., Humlum, M. K., & Nandrup, A. B. (2016). Increasing instruction time in school does increase learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7481-7484. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516686113
Baten, E., Pixner, S., & Desoete, A. (2019). Motivational and math anxiety perspective for mathematical learning and learning difficulties. In A. Fritz, V. Haase, & P. Räsänen (Eds), International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_28
Beattie, S., Woodman, T., Fakehy, M., & Dempsey, C. (2016). The role of performance feedback on the self-efficacy-performance relationship. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000051
Biunno, M. (2019). Exploring the moderating effect of teacher practice on the relationship between prior student academic performance and current student academic performance in a New Jersey public school district [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Seton Hall University.
Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Instruction and curriculum. Regional education laboratory for the Carolina and Virginia, topical papers and reprints, number 1. Evaluation Comment, 1(2).
Bostan, C. M., Stanciu, T., & Andronic, R.-L. (2021). The moderation role of being valued by teachers over the association between school children motivation and need for competition. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211044179
Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176007
Cortes, K. E., & Goodman, J. S. (2014). Ability-tracking, instructional time, and better pedagogy: The effect of double-dose algebra on student achievement. American Economic Review, 104(5), 400-405. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.400
Doroudi, S. (2020). Mastery learning heuristics and their hidden models. In I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, & E. Millán (Eds). Artificial intelligence in education. (pp. 86-91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_16
Fryer, R. G. (2014). Injecting charter school best practices into traditional public schools: Evidence from field experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), 1355-1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju011
Gloria, R., Darmin, S., Wiyanto, & Indriyanti, D. (2018). The effectiveness of formative assessment with understanding by design (UbD) stages in forming habits of mind in prospective teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012158
Grothérus, A., Jeppsson, F., & Samuelsson, J. (2019). Formative scaffolding: How to alter the level and strength of self-efficacy and foster self-regulation in a mathematics test situation. Educational Action Research, 27(5), 667-690. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1538893
Guo, L., Li, J., Xu, Z., Hu, X., Liu, C., Xing, X., Li, X., White, H., & Yang, K. (2007). PROTOCOL: The relationship between homework time and academic performance among K-12 students: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(4), e1199. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1199
Hassan, O. (2022). Classroom applicability of Bloom’s mastery learning as perceived by teachers. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum [Humanics: Scientific Study of General Subjects], 22(1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v22i1.43372
Jamovi. (2022). Jamovi software version 2.3. https://www.jamovi.org
Jensen, V. M. (2013). Working longer makes students stronger? The effects of ninth grade classroom hours on ninth grade student performance. Educational Research, 55(2), 180-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.801244
Kikuchi, N. (2014). The effect of instructional time reduction on educational attainment: Evidence from the Japanese curriculum standards revision. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 32, 17-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2014.01.001
McCallum, S., & Milner, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of formative assessment: Student views and staff reflections. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761
Ozyildirim, G. (2022). Time spent on homework and academic achievement: A meta-analysis study related to results of TIMSS. Psicología Educativa [Educational Psychology], 28(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a30
Parinduri, R. A. (2014). Do children spend too much time in schools? Evidence from a longer school year in Indonesia. Economics of Education Review, 41(1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.05.001
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Allen, A. B. (2010). Extending the school day or school year: A systematic review of research (1985-2009). Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 401-436. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310377086
Piaget, J. (1965). Psihologia inteligenței [The psychology of intelligence]. Editura Științifică [Scientific Publishing House].
Romanian Ministry of Education. (2022. June 30). Press releases. https://www.edu.ro
Siddaiah-Subramanya, M., Smith, S., & Lonie, J. (2017). Mastery learning: How is it helpful? An analytical review. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 8, 269-275. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S131638
Talbert, E., Hofkens, T., & Wang, M.-T. (2019). Does student-centered instruction engage students differently? The moderation effect of student ethnicity. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1519690
Toler, W. M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of mastery learning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ball State University.
Valle, A., Piñeiro, I., Rodríguez, S., Regueiro, B., Freire, C., & Rosário, P. (2019). Time spent and time management in homework in elementary school students: A person-centered approach. Psicothema [Psychothema], 31(4), 422-428. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.191
Wedel, K. (2021). Instruction time and student achievement: The moderating role of teacher qualifications. Economics of Education Review, 85, 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102183

How to cite this article

APA

Vlădescu, C. (2023). The relationship between mastery learning models and academic achievement in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(4), em0751. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13705

Vancouver

Vlădescu C. The relationship between mastery learning models and academic achievement in mathematics. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(4):em0751. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13705

AMA

Vlădescu C. The relationship between mastery learning models and academic achievement in mathematics. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(4), em0751. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13705

Chicago

Vlădescu, Cristina. "The relationship between mastery learning models and academic achievement in mathematics". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2023 18 no. 4 (2023): em0751. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13705

Harvard

Vlădescu, C. (2023). The relationship between mastery learning models and academic achievement in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(4), em0751. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13705

MLA

Vlădescu, Cristina "The relationship between mastery learning models and academic achievement in mathematics". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2023, em0751. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13705