The Manipulation of Algebraic Expressions: Deepening of a Widespread Difficulties and New Characterizations

Federica Ferretti

doi:10.29333/iejme/5884

Full Text (PDF)

Federica Ferretti ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Faculty of Education, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, ITALY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The learning of algebra represents a difficulty within the mathematics learning process. Precisely because of their epistemological and ontological nature, semiotics provides a good key to understanding the main difficulties that hinder the learning of algebraic objects. The answers to a large scale assessments task that requires a treatment in the sense of Duval of sizeable sample of upper secondary school student is analysed. Statistical analysis allows the nationwide data to be considered according to students’ ability levels. The study confirms and quantifies the distance between personal meaning and the cultural meaning attributed to algebraic objects. The difficulties of the manipulation of algebraic expressions is deepened and characterized.

Keywords

algebra
semiotics
large-scale assessments

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, 2020, Volume 15, Issue 1, Article No: em0548

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5884

Publication date: 21 Aug 2019

Article Views: 2148

Article Downloads: 1717

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Arcavi, A. (1995). Teaching and Learning Algebra: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(1), 145-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-3123(95)90033-0
Bell, A. (1995). Purpose in school algebra. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(1), 41-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-3123(95)90023-3
Bolondi, G., Ferretti, F., & Giberti, C. (2018). Didactic Contract as a Key to Interpreting Gender Differences in Maths. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), (18), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2018-018-bolo
Callingham, R., & Bond, T. (2006). Research in mathematics education and Rasch measurement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217432
De Lange, J. (2007). Large-Scale Assessment and Mathematics Education. In Frank K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 1111-1142). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
Duval, R. (1988). Pour une approche cognitive des problèmes de géométrie en termes de congruences. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 1, 57–74. Strasbourg, France: IREM et Université Louis Pasteur.
Duval, R. (1993). Registres de représentations sémiotique et fonctionnement cognitif de la pensée. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 5, 37–65. Strasbourg, France: IREM et Université Louis Pasteur.
Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine: Registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels. Berne: Peter Lang.
Duval, R. (2008). Eight problems for a semiotic approach in mathematics education. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture (pp. 39–61). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London, Falmer Press.
Ferretti, F., Giberti, C., & Lemmo, A. (2018). The Didactic Contract to interpret some statistical evidence in mathematics standardized assessment tests. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2895-2906. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90988
Ferretti, F., Lemmo, A. & Martignone, F. (2018). Attained curriculum and external assessment in Italy: how to reflect on them?. In Y. Shimizu and R. Vithal (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth ICMI Study School Mathematics Curriculum Reforms: Challenges, Changes and Opportunities (pp.381–388). Tsukuba, Japan: ICMI.
Gestinv 2.0. Interactive archive of the INVALSI tests. http://www.gestinv.it (ver. 15.04.2019).
Godino J., Batanero C. (1994). Significado institucional y personal de los objectos matematicos. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques. 14(3), 325-355.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Hart, L.C., Smith, S.Z., Swars, S. L., Smith, M.E. (2009). An Examination of Research Methods in Mathematics Education (1995-2005). Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3(1), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325771
Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York.
Kieran, C. (1995). A new look at school algebra-Past, present, and future. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-3123(95)90020-9
Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels: Building meaning for symbols and their manipulation. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 2, 707-762.
Kieran, C. (2014). Algebra teaching and learning. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_6
Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the learning of mathematics, 22(2), 14-23.
Radford, L. (2008). The ethics of being and knowing: Towards a cultural theory of learning. In Semiotics in mathematics education (pp. 215-234). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
Radford, L. (2010). Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800903569741
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Denmarks Paedagogiske Institut.
Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14(1), 15-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-3123(95)90022-5

How to cite this article

APA

Ferretti, F. (2020). The Manipulation of Algebraic Expressions: Deepening of a Widespread Difficulties and New Characterizations. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0548. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5884

Vancouver

Ferretti F. The Manipulation of Algebraic Expressions: Deepening of a Widespread Difficulties and New Characterizations. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1):em0548. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5884

AMA

Ferretti F. The Manipulation of Algebraic Expressions: Deepening of a Widespread Difficulties and New Characterizations. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1), em0548. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5884

Chicago

Ferretti, Federica. "The Manipulation of Algebraic Expressions: Deepening of a Widespread Difficulties and New Characterizations". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 1 (2020): em0548. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5884

Harvard

Ferretti, F. (2020). The Manipulation of Algebraic Expressions: Deepening of a Widespread Difficulties and New Characterizations. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0548. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5884

MLA

Ferretti, Federica "The Manipulation of Algebraic Expressions: Deepening of a Widespread Difficulties and New Characterizations". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 1, 2020, em0548. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5884