The positive impact of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs on student achievement, attitude, interest, communication skills and problem-solving has alerted the education community to reform instructional approaches in STEM subjects. This meta-analysis study aims to analyze previous studies’ results of STEM program impacting students’ mathematics achievement. The criteria for inclusion of literature in the meta-analysis were: published between 1998 and 2017, employed experimental research design, and reported data necessary for computing effect sizes. Based on the Hedges-g effect size values, three of the studies were categorized into the large effect category (n=3), two studies were classified under the medium effect group (n=2), and twelve studies were considered to be small effect sizes (n=12). The overall weighted average effect size was 0.242 with a corresponding p-value of 0.023 demonstrating that STEM had an impact on student mathematics achievement. However, no evidence was found concerning the impact of STEM program on students’ mathematics achievement based on the three moderator variables: education level, publication source, and length of intervention. Limitations and implications of the study were discussed.

• Alumbaugh, K. M. (2015). The perceptions of elementary STEM schools in Missouri (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lindenwood University, Saint Charles, Missouri.
• Ashford, V. D. (2016). STEM after school programming: The effect on student achievement and attitude (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wingate University, Charlotte, NC.
• Bahri, N. M., Suryawati E., & Osman, K. (2014). Students’ biotechnology literacy: The pillars of STEM education in Malaysia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1074a
• Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019454
• Becker, L. A. (2000). Effect size (ES). Retrieved from https://www.uccs.edu/lbecker/effect-size
• Berland, L., Steingut, R., & Ko, P. (2014). High school student perceptions of the utility of the engineering design process: Creating opportunities to engage in engineering practices and apply math and science content. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 705-720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9498-4
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
• Brown, J. (2012). The current status of STEM education research. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 13(5), 7-11. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1266493670?accountid=16369
• Chia, P. L., & Maat, S. M. (2018). An exploratory study of teachers’ attitudes towards integration of STEM in Malaysia. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(1), 45-50. Retrieved from http://smk.ukm.my/erep/fail3.cfm?komp=TGG2018484
• DeBiase, K. (2016). Teacher preparation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). California State University, Los Angeles.
• Dejarnette, N. K. (2012). America’s children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77-84. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281065932
• Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21^st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
• Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Designbased science and real world problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855-879. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038165
• Glavich, C. (2016). Growing strong STEMs reflections of a beginning teacher’s preservice program. Issues in Teacher Education, 25(2), 89-102. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/6e23b55cb5b18d24dd6a22573003d3ef/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=28752
• Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2016). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, science, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9673-x
• Han, S., Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) on students’ achievement in four mathematics topics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13, 3-29. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10168a
• Hansen, M., & Gonzalez, T. (2014). Investigating the relationship between STEM learning principles and student achievement in math and science. American Journal of Education, 120(2), 139-171. https://doi.org/10.1086/674376
• Harper, S. R. (2010). An anti-deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.362
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
• Ing, M. (2013). Gender differences in the influence of early perceived parental support on student mathematics and science achievement and STEM career attainment. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1221-1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9447-3
• Ing, M. (2014). Can parents influence children’s mathematics achievement and persistence in STEM careers. Journal of Career Development, 41(2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845313481672
• James, J. S. (2014). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) curriculum and seventh grade mathematics and science achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, Arizona.
• Judson, E. (2014). Effects of transferring to STEM-focused charter and magnet schools on student achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(4), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.823367
• Khalil, N. M., & Osman, K. (2017). STEM 21CS Module: Fostering 21^st century skills through integrated STEM. K-12 STEM Education, 3(3), 225-233. Retrieved from http://smk.ukm.my/erep/fail3.cfm?komp=TGG2017804
• Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Service Reports, Paper 35, 1-35. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/35/
• Kulturel-Konak, S., D’Allegro, M. L., Dickinson, S. (2011). Riview of gender differences in learning styles: Suggetion for STEM education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 4(3), 9-18. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1072833.pdf
• Kutch, M. (2011). Integrating science and mathematics instruction in a middle school STEM course: The impact on attitudes, career aspirations and academic achievement in science and mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wilmington University, DE.
• Lee, A. (2013). Determining the effects of pre-college STEM contexts on STEM major choices in 4-year postsecondary institutions using multilevel structural equation modeling. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 3(2), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1059
• Leuwerke, W. C., Robbins, S., Sawyer, R., & Hovland, M. (2004). Predicting engineering major status from mathematics achievement and interest congruence. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072703257756
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• McCaslin, S. D. (2015). The influence of stem initiative programs for middle and high school students on female STEM college majors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minnesota, US.
• Melguizo, T., & Wolniak, G. C. (2011). The earnings benefits of majoring in STEM fields among high achieving minority students. Research in Higher Education, 53(4), 383-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9238-z
• Nasarudin, A, Halim, L., & Zakaria, E. (2014). VStops: A thinking strategy and visual representation approach in mathematical word problem solving toward enhancing STEM literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1073a
• Olivarez, N. (2012). The impact of a STEM program on academic achievement of eighth grade students in a south Texas middle school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, Texas.
• Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education Ver. I, 5(6), 2320-7388. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670
• Osman, K., & Saat, R. M. (2014). Editorial. Science technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education in Malaysia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 153-154. Retrieved from http://smk.ukm.my/erep/fail3.cfm?komp=TGG2014397
• Petersen, A. M. (2014). Females and STEM: Determining the K-12 experiences that influenced women to pursue STEM fields (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.
• Richardson, S. S. (2016). The effect of an integrated STEM course on middle school students’ interest and career aspirations in STEM Fields (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
• Robinson, A., Dailey, D., Hughes, G., & Cotabish, A. (2014). The effects of a science-focused STEM intervention on gifted elementary students’ science knowledge and skills. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14533799
• Shahali, E. H. M. S., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM learning through engineering design, impact on middle secondary students interest towards STEM. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189-1211. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a
• Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Rasul, S., Osman, K., Ikhsan, Z., & Rahim, F. (2015). Bitara-STEM^TM training of trainers’ programme: Impact on trainers’ knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and efficacy towards integrated STEM teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(1), 85-95. Retrieved from http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol14/85-95.Shahali_JBSE_Vol.14_No.1.pdf
• Shepherd, A. A. W. (2016). The effect of middle school STEM curriculum on science and math achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Union University, Tennessee, US.
• Thomas, M. E. (2013). The effects of an integrated S.T.E.M. curriculum in fourth grade students’ mathematics achievement and attitudes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Trevecca Nazarene University, Tennessee, US.
• Tolliver, E. R. (2016). The effects of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education on elementary student achievement in urban schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Grand Canyon University, Arizona, US.
• Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking: Links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 367-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413484756
• Walker, L. H., & Sherman, H. J. (2017). Common core and STEM opportunities. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 14(1-3), 413-434. Retrieved from http://schoarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol14/iss1/23
• Walker, R. J. (2008). Twelve characteristics of an effective teacher: A longitudinal, qualitative, quasi-research study of in-service and pre-service teachers’ opinions. Educational Horizons, 61-68. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ815372.pdf
• Wilhelm, J. (2014). Project-based instruction with future STEM educators: An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(4), 80-90. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43632018
• Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (2010). Developing and retaining effective teachers and principals. Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.