International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Indexed in ESCI
Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge for teaching definitions
APA
In-text citation: (Mosvold & Fauskanger, 2013)
Reference: Mosvold, R., & Fauskanger, J. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge for teaching definitions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2-3), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/273
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Mosvold R, Fauskanger J. Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge for teaching definitions. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2013;8(2-3), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/273
Chicago
In-text citation: (Mosvold and Fauskanger, 2013)
Reference: Mosvold, Reidar, and Janne Fauskanger. "Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge for teaching definitions". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2013 8 no. 2-3 (2013): 43-61. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/273
Harvard
In-text citation: (Mosvold and Fauskanger, 2013)
Reference: Mosvold, R., and Fauskanger, J. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge for teaching definitions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2-3), pp. 43-61. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/273
MLA
In-text citation: (Mosvold and Fauskanger, 2013)
Reference: Mosvold, Reidar et al. "Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge for teaching definitions". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 8, no. 2-3, 2013, pp. 43-61. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/273
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Mosvold R, Fauskanger J. Teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge for teaching definitions. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2013;8(2-3):43-61. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/273

Abstract

Previous research indicates the importance of teachers’ knowledge of mathematical definitions—as well as their beliefs. Much remains unknown, however, about the specific knowledge required doing the mathematical task of teaching involving definitions and the related teacher beliefs. In this article, we analyze focus-group interviews that were conducted in a Norwegian context to examine the adaptability of the U.S. developed measures of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Qualitative content analysis was applied in order to learn more about the teachers’ beliefs about mathematical knowledge for teaching definitions. The results indicate that teachers believe knowledge of mathematical definitions is an important aspect of mathematical knowledge for teaching, but they do not regard it as important to actually know the mathematical definitions themselves.

References

  • Ball, D. L., & Hill, H. C. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) measures - Mathematics released items 2008. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
  • Bendixen, L. D., & Feucht, F. C. (2010). Personal epistemology in the classroom: theory, research, and implications for practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beswick, K. (2011). Knowledge/beliefs and their relationship to emotion. In K. Kislenko (Ed.), Current state of research on mathematical beliefs XVI: Proceedings of the MAVI-16 conference June 26-29, 2010 (pp. 43–59). Tallinn, Estonia: Institute of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tallinn University.
  • Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians’ mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 127–147.
  • Blömeke, S., & Delaney, S. (2012). Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: a review of the state of research. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 223–247
  • Blömeke, S., Hsieh, F. J., Kaiser, G., & Schmidt, W. H. (Eds.) (2014). International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn. TEDS-M results. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(3), 415– 449.
  • Buehl, M. M., & Fives, H. (2009). Exploring teachers' beliefs about teaching knowledge: Where does it come from? Does it change? The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 367–408.
  • Cole, Y. (2012). Assessing elemental validity: The transfer and use of mathematical knowledge for teaching measures in Ghana. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 415–426.
  • Cooney, T. J. (1985). A beginning teacher’s view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324–336.
  • De Villiers, M. (1998). To teach definitions in geometry or teach to define? In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-second International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 248–255). Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.
  • Delaney, S. F. (2008). Adapting and using U.S. measures to study Irish teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  • Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 249–253). New York, NY: Falmer.
  • Fauskanger, J. (2012). “For norske lærere har stort sett en algoritme” – om undervisningskunnskap i matematikk [“Because Norwegian teachers normally have an algorithm” – about mathematical knowledge for teaching]. In F. Rønning, R. Diesen, H. Hoveid & I. Pareliussen (Eds.), FoU i Praksis 2011. Rapport fra konferanse om praksisrettet FoU i lærerutdanning [Report from the conference on practice-based research and development in teacher education] (pp. 129–141). Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
  • Fauskanger, J., Jakobsen, A., Mosvold, R., & Bjuland, R. (2012). Analysis of psychometric properties as part of an iterative adaptation process of MKT items for use in other countries. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education 44(3), 387–399.
  • Fauskanger, J., & Mosvold, R. (2010). Undervisningskunnskap i matematikk: Tilpasning av en amerikansk undersøkelse til norsk, og læreres opplevelse av undersøkelsen [Mathematical knowledge for teaching: Adaptation of an American instrument into Norwegian, and teachers' experience of the instrument]. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 94(2), 112–123.
  • Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2008). What do teachers believe? Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers’ knowledge and ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 134–176.
  • Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2010). Teachers’ articulation of beliefs about teaching knowledge: conceptualizing a belief framework. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom (pp. 470–515). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forgasz, H. J., & Leder, G. C. (2008). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 1 - Knowledge and Beliefs in Mathematics Teaching and Teaching Development, pp. 173–192). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? (pp. 39–57). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Graeber, A., & Tirosh, D. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge. Useful concept or elusive notion. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 1 - Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development, pp. 117–132). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givving, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., Jacobs, J., et al. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study, NCES (2003-013). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11–30.
  • Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: An introduction. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 3–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.
  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
  • Knapp, J. (2006). A framework to examine definition use in proof. In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz, and A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 15–22). Mérida, México: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Kuntze, S. (2011). Pedagogical content beliefs: Global, content domain-related and situationspecific components. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 1–20.
  • Leikin, R., & Zazkis, R. (2010). On the content-dependence of prospective teachers’ knowledge: A case of exemplifying definitions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(4), 451–466.
  • Morgan, D. L. (1998). The focus group guidebook - Focus group kit 1. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  • Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491–529.
  • Mosvold, R., Fauskanger, J., Jakobsen, A., & Melhus, K. (2009). Translating test items into Norwegian – without getting lost in translation? Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 14(4), 101–123.
  • Ng, D. (2012). Using the MKT measures to reveal Indonesian teachers’ mathematical knowledge: challenges and potentials. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(3), 401–413.
  • Op’t Eynde, O., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing students’ mathematicsrelated beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 13–37). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). Epistemic dimensions of students’ mathematics-related belief systems. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(1–2), 57–70.
  • Pehkonen, E. (2008). State-of-the-art in mathematical beliefs research. In M. Niss (Ed.), ICME-10 Proceedings and Regular Lectures (pp. 1–14). Copenhagen: ICME-10.
  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehard, and Winston.
  • Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Ravindran, B., Greene, B. A., & DeBacker, T. K. (2005). Predicting preservice teachers’ cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs. Journal of Educational Research, 98(4), 222–232.
  • Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550–576.
  • Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2009). Developing primary mathematics teaching. London: Sage Publishers.
  • Schommer, M. (1994). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and the role of learning. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 25–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schommer-Aikins, M., Bird, M., & Bakken, L. (2010). Manifestations of an epistemological belief system in preschool to grade twelve classrooms. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom (pp. 31–54). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  • Sinatra, G. M., & Kardash, C. A. M. (2004). Teacher candidates’ epistemological beliefs, dispositions, and views on teaching as persuasion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 483–498.
  • Skott, J. (2001). The emerging practices of a novice teacher: The roles of his school mathematics images. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 3–28.
  • Stylianides, A. J., & Delaney, S. (2011). The cultural dimension of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In Rowland T. & Ruthven K. (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 179–191). London: Springer.
  • Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 105–127.
  • Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.
  • Usiskin, Z., & Griffin, J. (2008). The classification of quadrilaterals: A study in definition. Charlotte, NC: Information Age publishing.
  • Van Zoest, L., Jones, G., & Thornton, C. (1994). Beliefs about mathematics teaching held by pre-service teachers involved in a first grade mentorship program. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 37–55.
  • Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2008). Exemplifying definitions: A case of a square. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 131–14.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.