International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Indexed in ESCI
Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Attitudes towards the Use of Technology in Mathematics Classrooms
In-text citation: (Marbán & Mulenga, 2019)
Reference: Marbán, J. M., & Mulenga, E. M. (2019). Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Attitudes towards the Use of Technology in Mathematics Classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 253-263.
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Marbán JM, Mulenga EM. Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Attitudes towards the Use of Technology in Mathematics Classrooms. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2019;14(2), 253-263.
In-text citation: (Marbán and Mulenga, 2019)
Reference: Marbán, José M., and Eddie M. Mulenga. "Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Attitudes towards the Use of Technology in Mathematics Classrooms". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2019 14 no. 2 (2019): 253-263.
In-text citation: (Marbán and Mulenga, 2019)
Reference: Marbán, J. M., and Mulenga, E. M. (2019). Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Attitudes towards the Use of Technology in Mathematics Classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), pp. 253-263.
In-text citation: (Marbán and Mulenga, 2019)
Reference: Marbán, José M. et al. "Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Attitudes towards the Use of Technology in Mathematics Classrooms". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 14, no. 2, 2019, pp. 253-263.
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Marbán JM, Mulenga EM. Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Attitudes towards the Use of Technology in Mathematics Classrooms. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2019;14(2):253-63.


The integration of ICT in formal teaching and learning environments has become more and more relevant along the last decades. However, its use in the mathematics classroom seems to be still far from initial expectations. This paper shows the results from a research conducted to get some insight about such a gap by analyzing the relationship between pre-service primary teachers’ teaching styles in teaching and learning mathematics and their attitudes towards the use of technology in mathematics classrooms. Analysis of Variances and step-wise multiple regression analysis were performed over the data provided by one hundred and sixty three participants by completing survey questionnaires. The results indicate that pre-service teachers’ year of study has no significant impact on the integration of ICT in the teaching and learning of mathematics while teaching styles and gender do have. Furthermore, age, gender and teaching styles are capable predictors for the construction of the regression model and it is deduced that teaching styles have a predictive ability on the integration of ICT in mathematics classrooms.


  • Adedoja, G., Adelore, O., Egbokhare, F., & Oluleye, A. (2013). Learners’ acceptance of the use of mobile phones to deliver tutorials in a distance learning context: a case study at the University of Ibadan. The African Journal of Information Systems, 5(3), 80-93.
  • Aitkin, M., Bennett, S. N., & Hesketh, J. (1981). Teaching styles and pupil progress: a re‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(2), 170-186.
  • Arias, W.L., Galdos, D., & Ceballos, K.D. (2018). Teaching styles and self-regulation of learning in students of education at St. Pablo Catholic University. Journal of Learning Styles, 11(21), 95-123
  • Bagon, S., Gacnik, M., & Starcic, A. I. (2018). Information Communication Technology Use among Students in Inclusive Classrooms. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(6), 56-72.
  • Brown, J. P. (2017). Teachers’ perspectives of changes in their practice during a technology in mathematics education research project. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 52-65.
  • Clark, K. D. (2001). Urban middle school teachers’ use of instructional technology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 178-195.
  • Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results (Doctoral dissertation). Sloan School of Management, MIT, 1986
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
  • Dix, K. (2005). Are learning technologies making a difference? A longitudinal perspective of attitudes. International Educational Journal, 5, 15–28.
  • Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher Pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435.
  • Fan, W., & Ye, S. (2007). Teaching styles among Shanghai teachers in primary and secondary schools. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 255-272.
  • Fraenkel, R. J., & Wallen, E. N. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th ed.). San Francisco: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gaitanaru, A. (2014). Advantages and difficulties of implementation of new information technologies in education: let´s build the future through learning innovation. En Ion Roceanu (Ed.): Proceedings of the 10th International Conference “eLearning and Software for Education”, Vol. 3 (pp. 205-209). Bucharest: Editura Universitatii Nationale de Aparare “Carol I”.
  • Gillen, J., Staarman, J. K., Littleton, K., Mercer, N., & Twiner 2, A. (2007). A ‘learning revolution’? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243-256.
  • González, A., Conde, Á., Díaz, P., García, M. & Ricoy, C. (2018). Instructors’ teaching styles: relation with competences, self-efficacy, and commitment in pre-service teachers. Higher Education, 75(2), 625-642.
  • Goos, M., & Bennson, A. (2008). Surveying the technology landscape: Teachers’ use of technology in secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 102-130.
  • Grasha, A. F. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as a expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator and delegator. College Teaching, 42(4), 142-49.
  • Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhance learning by understanding learning and teaching style. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance Publishers
  • Grasha, A.F., & Reichmann-Hruska, S. (1996). Teaching style survey. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
  • Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.
  • Hidalgo-Cabrillana, A., & Lopez-Mayan, C. (2018). Teaching styles and achievement: student and teacher perspectives. Economics of Education Review.
  • Huang, H. M., & Liaw, S. S. (2005). Exploring users’ attitudes and intentions toward the Web as a survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 729-743.
  • Hussain, H. S., Din, R., Khidzir, N. Z., Daud, K. A. M., & Ahmad (2018). Risk and Threat via Online Social Network among Academia at Higher Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1018, No. 1, p.012008). IOP Publishing.
  • Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149-173.
  • Kubiatko, M., & Halakova, Z. (2011). Slovak high school students’ attitudes to ICT using in biology lesson. Computers in Human Behavior 25(3), 743-748.
  • Kuhlemeier, H., & Hemker, B. (2007). The impact of computer use at home on students’ Internet skills. Computer & Education, 49, 460–480.
  • Kumar, N., Rose, R.C., & D’Silva, J. L. (2008). Teachers’ readiness to use technology in the classroom: an empirical study. European Journal of Scientific Research 21(4), 603-616. Retrieved on July 30, 2017 from
  • Leung, F. K. S. (2013). Introduction to section: Technology in Mathematics Curriculum. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.): Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 517-524). New York: Springer.
  • Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215-243.
  • Li, Y. B., Zheng, W. Z., & Yang, F. (2017). Cooperation Learning of Flip teaching style on the MBA Mathematics Education Efficiency. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education 13(10), 6963-6972.
  • Macià, M., & Garreta, J. (2018). Accessibility and digital literacy: barriers to the integration of ICT in family / school communication. Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 239-257.
  • Masrom, M. (2007). Technology Acceptance Model and E-learning. [Online]. Retrieved on 26 Aug 2018 from
  • Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
  • Meggiolaro, S. (2018). Information and communication technologies use, gender and mathematics achievement: evidence from Italy. Social Psychology of Education, 21(2), 497-516.
  • Okitowamba, O., Julie, C., & Mbekwa, M. (2018). The effects of examination-driven teaching on mathematics achievement in Grade 10 school-based high-stakes examinations. Pythagoras, 39(1), a377.
  • Opdenakker, M. C., & Van Damme, J. (2006). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and teacher education, 22(1), 1-21.
  • Övez, F. T. D., & Uyangör, S. M. (2016). The Effect of the Match between the Learning and Teaching Styles of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers on Students’ Achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(29), 125-132.
  • Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that May Affect Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology in Secondary Mathematics Classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 299-317.
  • Prestridge S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449 458.
  • Ruiz-Jaramillo, J., & Vargas-Yáñez, A. (2018). La enseñanza de las estructuras en el Grado de Arquitectura. Metodología e innovación docente a través de las TIC | Teaching structures on Architecture degrees. ICT-based methodology and teaching innovation. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76(270), 353-372.
  • Salam, S., Zeng, J. Q., Pathan, Z. H., Latif, Z., & Shaheen, A. (2018). Impediments to the Integration of ICT in Public Schools of Contemporary Societies: A Review of Literature. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 14(1), 252-269.
  • Saltan, F., & Arslan, K. (2017). A comparison of in-service and pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-confidence. Cogent Education 4, p. 1311501.
  • Sánchez, A. B., Mena, J. J., González, M., & GuanLin, H. (2012). In service teachers’ attitudes towards the use of ICT in the classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1358-1364.
  • Sangcap, P. G. A. (2010). Mathematics-related Beliefs of Filipino College Students: Factors Affecting Mathematics and Problem Solving Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 465–475.
  • Tomczyk, Ł., Szotkowski, R., Fabiś, A., Wąsiński, A., Chudý, Š., & Neumeister, P. (2017). Selected aspects of conditions in the use of new media as an important part of the training of teachers in the Czech Republic and Poland - differences, risks and threats. Education and Information Technologies 22(3), 747-767.
  • Uslu, O. (2018). Factors Associated with Technology Integration to Improve Instructional Abilities: A Path Model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 31-50.
  • Van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 407–422.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  • Wu, T. J., & Tai, Y. N. (2016). Effects of multimedia information technology integrated multi-sensory instruction on students’ learning motivation and outcome. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 1065-1074.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.