International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Yimer ST, Feza NN. Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1), em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Yimer & Feza, 2020)
Reference: Yimer, S. T., & Feza, N. N. (2020). Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936
Chicago
In-text citation: (Yimer and Feza, 2020)
Reference: Yimer, Sirak Tsegaye, and Nosisi Nellie Feza. "Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 1 (2020): em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936
Harvard
In-text citation: (Yimer and Feza, 2020)
Reference: Yimer, S. T., and Feza, N. N. (2020). Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936
MLA
In-text citation: (Yimer and Feza, 2020)
Reference: Yimer, Sirak Tsegaye et al. "Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 1, 2020, em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Yimer ST, Feza NN. Learners’ Conceptual Knowledge Development and Attitudinal Change towards Calculus Using Jigsaw Co-operative Learning Strategy Integrated with GeoGebra. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1):em0554. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5936

Abstract

This study examined the influence of the jigsaw co-operative learning strategy integrated with GeoGebra (JCLGS), on Ethiopian undergraduate statistics and chemistry learners’ conceptual knowledge development and attitudinal change towards calculus. The post-positivism quantitative methods approach employed in a non-equivalent pre-and post-test comparison group quasi-experimental design. The samples had drawn using two-stage random sampling techniques. The sample size was 150 in both the experimental and comparison groups. Data were collected by using the calculus classroom achievement test and the five points Likert-scale attitude questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, an independent-samples t-test and Two-Way ANOVA for repeated measures using SPSS 23.0. The results showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups of pre-post test scores on the Two-Way ANOVA, F(1,148)=106.913; η2=.419 ; p<.01. The finding also implies that the blended learning strategy grounded in Vygotsky’s social constructivism cognitive development learning theory had big practical significance on learners’ conceptual knowledge development. Learners viewed the JCLGS as enjoyable and interesting. It was also a socially interactive and collaborative environment that allows learners’ to be reflective, share prior experience and knowledge and independent learners. It encourages them to have a positive attitude towards calculus and GeoGebra. Because of this finding, mathematics and science educators are advised to model a similar blended learning strategy in a classroom instructional setting. It will benefit their learners to adequately construct conceptual knowledge and positively change their attitude towards mathematics.

References

  • Adebule, S. O. (2009). Reliability and levels of difficulty of objective test items in a Mathematics achievement test: A study of ten senior secondary schools in five local government areas of Akure, Ondo State. Educational Research and Reviews, 4(11), 585-587.
  • Alkhateeb, M. A., & Al-Duwairi, A. M. (2019). The Effect of Using Mobile Applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the Students’ Achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523-533. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5754
  • Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.
  • Arbin, N., Ghani, S. A., & Hamzah, F. M. (2014, June). Teaching calculus using module based on cooperative learning strategy. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1602(1), 497-501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4882531
  • Arbini, C. (2016). The Impact of Graphing Calculators on Math Achievement: A Quantitative, Longevity Analysis. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
  • Awang, N., & Hamid, N. N. A. (2015, October). Students attitude towards calculus subject: A case-study using structural equation modeling. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1682(1), 050012.1-050012.5). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932503
  • Awang, N., Ilias, M. R., Che Hussain, W. S. E., & Mokhtar, S. F. (2013, April). Students attitude towards calculus subject: Bumiputera case-study. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1522(1), 392-395. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4801151
  • Ayub, A. F. M., Sembok, T. M., & Luan, W. S. (2008). Teaching and learning calculus using computer. Semantics scholar, 1-10. Retrieved from http://atcm.mathandtech.org/ep2008/papers_full/2412008_15028.pdf
  • Azmin, N. H. (2016). Effect of the Jigsaw-Based Cooperative Learning Method on Student Performance in the General Certificate of Education Advanced-Level Psychology: An Exploratory Brunei Case Study. International Education Studies, 9(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9nlp91
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. Retrieved from http://jte.sagepub.com
  • Bezuidenhout, J. (2001). Limits and continuity: Some conceptions of first-year students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(4), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390010022590
  • Boopathiraj, C., & Chellamani, K. (2013). Analysis of test items on difficulty level and discrimination index in the test for research in education. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 2(2), 189-193.
  • Boz Yaman, B. (2019). A Multiple Case Study: What Happens in Peer Tutoring of Calculus Studies?. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst/328336
  • Bransford, Brown, C. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • Brown, J. D. (2001). Point-biserial correlation coefficients. Shiken: JLT Testing and Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 5(3), 13–17. Retrieved from http://jlt.org/test/bro_12.htm or http://jlt.org/test/PDF/Brown12.pdf
  • Castellan, C. M. (2010). Quantitative and qualitative research: A view for clarity. International journal of education, 2(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v2i2.446
  • Chinnappan, M., & Forrester, T. (2014). Generating procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions by pre-service teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 871-896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0131-x
  • Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Psychology Press.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Approaches to qualitative data analysis. Research methods in education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
  • Cornelius, M., & Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40569-8
  • Costa, P., Oliveira, P. & Ferrão, M. E. (2009). Statistical issues on multiple choice tests in engineering assessment. In Proceedings of the 37th Sefi Conference, Rotterdam, Delft University of Technology, 1-7.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • Demircioglu, G., Aslan, A., & Yadigaroglu, M. (2014). Exploratory Factor Analysis Study for the Scale of High School Students’ Attitudes towards Chemistry. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications, 5(1), 38-45.
  • Ding, L., & Beichner, R. (2009). Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(2), 0201039(1-17). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020103
  • Engelbrecht, J., Bergsten, C., & Kågesten, O. (2012). Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in the engineering curriculum: Student conceptions and performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 138-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00045.x
  • Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A., & Potgieter, M. (2005). Undergraduate students’ performance and confidence in procedural and conceptual mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(7), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500271107
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Third Edition. Sage publications.
  • Fraenkel, J. R, Norman E., & Wallen. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGrow-Hill.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1981). Tosra: Test of science related attitudes: Handbook. Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Gelo, O. C. G. (2012). On research methods and their philosophical assumptions: “raising the consciousness of researchers” again. Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft, 14(2), 111-130.
  • Getie, B. (2013). Mathematics Subject Area Method I for Secondary. Post Graduate Diploma in Teaching, 2(1), 3-6.
  • Graham, M., Milanowski, A., & Miller, J. (2012). Measuring and Promoting Inter-Rater Agreement of Teacher and Principal Performance Ratings. Online Submission, ED532066, 1-33.
  • Gray, A. J. (1997). Constructivist teaching and learning. Saskatchewan School Trustees Association.
  • Gray, D. E. (2013). Doing research in the real world. Sage Publications.
  • Green, S. B., & Salkind, N, J. (2005). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Internal consistency estimates of reliability. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Heibert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063538
  • Highfield, K, & Goodwin, K. (2008). A review of recent research in early mathematics learning technology. In Navigating charts and charting directions: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of MERG.Brisbane: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
  • Hoover, W. A. (1996, August). The practice implications of constructivism. SEDL Letter, 9(3). Retrieved from www.sedl.org/pubs/sedletter/v09n03/practice.html
  • Huang, C. H. (2011). Investigating the attitudes toward calculus of engineering students in Taiwan. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 9(2), 80-85.
  • Jaafar, R., & Lin, Y. (2017). Assessment for Learning in the Calculus Classroom: A Proactive Approach to Engage Students in Active Learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 503-520.
  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed approaches. Sage Publications.
  • Kadijević, Đ. (1999). Conceptual tasks in mathematics education. The Teaching of Mathematics, 2(1), 59-64. Retrieved from https://eudml.org/doc/255835
  • Kandemir, M. A., & Demirbag-Keskin, P. (2019). Effect of Graphing Calculator Program Supported Problem Solving Instruction on Mathematical Achievement and Attitude. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 203-223. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1197997.pdf
  • Khashan, K. H. (2014). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of rational numbers for Riyadh elementary school teachers. Journal of Education and Human development, 3(4), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a17
  • Khine, M. S. (Ed.). (2013). Application of structural equation modeling in educational research and practice (Vol. 7). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1650-y
  • Kilicman, A., Hassan, M. A., & Husain, S. K. (2010). Teaching and learning using mathematics software “The New Challenge”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 613-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.2010.12.085
  • Kiliyanni, A. L., & Sivaraman, S. (2016). The perception-reality gap in financial literacy: Evidence from the most literate state in India. International Review of Economics Education, 23, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2016.07.001
  • Kim, B. (2001). Social constructivism. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 1(1), 16. ed. M. Orey. Retrieved from https://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php
  • Kline, P. (1986). A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. New York, NY: Methuen.
  • Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
  • Kridler, P. G. (2012). Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge: A Balanced Approach? (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3521915)
  • Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391
  • Kukla, A. (2013). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203130995
  • Lavicza, Z. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics teaching at the university level. Zdm, 42(1), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0225-1
  • Lee, A. (2012). The effects of computer-based learning activities and school contextual factors on student math achievement. Leadership and Policy Quarterly, 1(1), 58-72. Retrieved from https://www.untestedideas.com/uploads/3/1/1/6/3116134/factors_affecting_student_math_achievement.pdf
  • Liao, S. C., Hunt, E. A., & Chen, W. (2010). Comparison between inter-rater reliability and inter-rater agreement in performance assessment. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 39(8), 613-618.
  • Lim-Teo, S. K., Ahuja, O. P., & Lee, P. Y. (1999). Tertiary and junior college students’ attitude towards mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 4(1), 15-33.
  • Maltas, D., & Prescott, A. (2014). Calculus-based mathematics: An Australian endangered species?. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 28(2), 39-49.
  • Mazana, Y. M., Suero Montero, C., & Olifage, C. R. (2019). Investigating Students’ Attitude towards Learning Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematcs Edcation, 14(1), 207-231. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/3997
  • McMahon, M. (1997). Social constructivism and the World Wide Web-A paradigm for learning’, paper presented to ASCILITE conference, (327), 411-417. Perth, Australia. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/Mcmahon/Mcmahon.html
  • Nenty, H. J. (2009). Writing a quantitative research thesis. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 19-32.
  • Ocal, M. F. (2017). The Effect of GeoGebra on Students’ Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Applications of Derivative. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p67
  • Oktaviyanthi, R., & Supriani, Y. (2015). Experimental Design: Utilizing Microsoft Mathematics in Teaching and Learning Calculus. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(25), 75 -83. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.1.1902.63-76
  • Orey, M. (2010). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching and technology. North Charleston: CreateSpace.
  • Othman, Z. S., Tarmuji, N. H., & Hilmi, Z. A. G. (2017, April). Students perception on the usage of PowerPoint in learning calculus. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1830(1), 050005(1-7). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4980942
  • Pallant, J., & Manual, S. S. (2010). A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Berkshine, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Parrot, M. A. S., & Leong, K. E. (2018) Impact of using graphing calculator in problem solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2704
  • Peteros, E., Columna, D., Etcuban, J. O., Almerino, Jr., P., & Almerino, J. G. (2019). Attitude and Academic Achievement of High School Students in Mathematics Under the Conditional Cash Transfer Program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5770
  • Pilgrim, M. E. (2010). A concepts for calculus intervention: Measuring student attitudes toward mathematics and achievement in calculus (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University. Libraries). Retrieved from Dissertations & Theses @ Colorado State University.(Publication No. AAT3419112).
  • Roth, W. M. (1999). Authentic school science: Intellectual traditions. Learning and knowledge. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
  • Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th Ed.). Pearson education Limited, Harlow.
  • Siyepu, S. (2013). The zone of proximal development in the learning of mathematics. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1-13. Retrieved from http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za
  • Sofroniou, A., & Poutos, K. (2016). Investigating the effectiveness of group work in mathematics. Education Sciences, 6(30), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6030030
  • Star, J. R., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Procedural and conceptual knowledge: exploring the gap between knowledge type and knowledge quality. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 169 -181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.784828
  • Summit, R., & Rickards, T. (2013). A constructivist approach to mathematics laboratory classes. In Proceedings of the 9th DELTA Conference on Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Mathematics and Statisitcs (pp. 190-198).
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
  • Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311-325. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26357806
  • Yimer, S. (2016). Use of Computer Interactive Simulation on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Calculus (Doctoral proposal), UNISA, 1-4.
  • Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 9(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
  • Young, C. Y., Georgiopoulos, M., Hagen, S. C., Geiger, C. L., Dagley-Falls, M. A., Islas, A. L., ... & Bradbury, E. E. (2011). Improving student learning in calculus through applications. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(5), 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.550944
  • Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2012). The Effect of Using GeoGebra on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of High School Mathematics Students. The Journal Asian Social Science, 8(11), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n11p102
  • Zulnaidi, H., & Zamri, S. N. A. S. (2017). The effectiveness of the GeoGebra software: the intermediary role of procedural knowledge on students’ conceptual knowledge and their achievement in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2155-2180. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01219a

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.