International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Geogebra as a Scaffolding Tool for Exploring Analytic Geometry Structure and Developing Mathematical Thinking of Diverse Achievers
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Khalil M, Khalil U, ul Haq Z. Geogebra as a Scaffolding Tool for Exploring Analytic Geometry Structure and Developing Mathematical Thinking of Diverse Achievers. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2019;14(2), 427-434. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5746
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Khalil et al., 2019)
Reference: Khalil, M., Khalil, U., & ul Haq, Z. (2019). Geogebra as a Scaffolding Tool for Exploring Analytic Geometry Structure and Developing Mathematical Thinking of Diverse Achievers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 427-434. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5746
Chicago
In-text citation: (Khalil et al., 2019)
Reference: Khalil, Muhammad, Umair Khalil, and Zahoor ul Haq. "Geogebra as a Scaffolding Tool for Exploring Analytic Geometry Structure and Developing Mathematical Thinking of Diverse Achievers". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2019 14 no. 2 (2019): 427-434. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5746
Harvard
In-text citation: (Khalil et al., 2019)
Reference: Khalil, M., Khalil, U., and ul Haq, Z. (2019). Geogebra as a Scaffolding Tool for Exploring Analytic Geometry Structure and Developing Mathematical Thinking of Diverse Achievers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), pp. 427-434. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5746
MLA
In-text citation: (Khalil et al., 2019)
Reference: Khalil, Muhammad et al. "Geogebra as a Scaffolding Tool for Exploring Analytic Geometry Structure and Developing Mathematical Thinking of Diverse Achievers". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 14, no. 2, 2019, pp. 427-434. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5746
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Khalil M, Khalil U, ul Haq Z. Geogebra as a Scaffolding Tool for Exploring Analytic Geometry Structure and Developing Mathematical Thinking of Diverse Achievers. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2019;14(2):427-34. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5746

Abstract

One of the reasons to use technology in education is to visualize and explore the insight of mathematics with optimum possibilities. Geogebra gives visual meaning to symbolic ideas along with optimum dynamic possibilities. The purpose of this experimental study was to know about the potential effect of dynamic geometry software on diverse students’ mathematical thinking behavior. For which a sample of forty students (grade-12) of F.G Inter College for Boys Mardan Cantt was selected. On the of their previous grade-11 standardized exams two groups along with their nested factors higher and lower achievers students were constructed. To investigate students’ mathematical thinking basis in the subject of analytic geometry, a model behavior of thinking with its six aspects was constructed on the basis of this model a well-design criterion test was developed for data collection. The six dependent variables were combined together to form the total mathematical thinking in this research study. Further, six week experiments of 22 lessons were prepared and two teaching methods traditional vs DGS (Dynamic Geometry Software) aided instructions were tested for two groups with almost equal statistical background and with the same compatibility in the biological age. Two hypotheses were carried out i.e. Treatment does not significantly affect the higher and low achievers of the two groups in mathematical thinking mean scores. To check the significant effect of the treatment on the students’ overall mathematical thinking variable across the groups, the two-way (ANOVA) was used and analyzed through as statistical tool SPSS. The study findings showed that treatment did significantly affect the higher and lower achievers of the two groups in mathematical thinking mean scores.

References

  • Amirali, M., & Halai, A. (2010). Teachers’ knowledge about the nature of mathematics: A survey of secondary school teachers in Karachi, Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 32(2), 45–61. Retrieved from http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/ier/PDF-FILES/3-Munira%20Almirani.pdf
  • Ang, K. C. (2010). Teaching and learning mathematical modeling with technology. In Proceedings of the 15th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics, Beijing, China, pp.19-29.
  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. A. (2013). Introduction to research in education (9th Ed.) (pp. 328-329). California: Wadsworth.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th Ed.) (pp. 319-320). Routledge: USA.
  • Dindyal, J. (2007). The need for an inclusive framework for students’ thinking in school geometry. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 4(1), 73-83.
  • EMIS. (2013-2014). Annual Statistical Report of Government Schools, Elementary & Secondary Education Department (pp. 2-11), Pakistan: Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Retrieved from http://www.kpese.gov.pk/ASCMain.html
  • Evans, B. R. (2014). The development of Mathematics throughout the centuries: A brief History in a cultural context, Chapter No.12, (pp. 123-127). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Farooq, R. A. (2001). Understanding Research in Education (P-11, 29, 90). Rawalpindi; University of Arid Agriculture.
  • Gay, L. R., & Mills, G. E. (2009).Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application (9th Ed.) (pp. 222). Islamabad: National Book Foundation.
  • Gillani, S. N. (2005). Effectiveness of Instructional Technology in Teaching of Biology to Secondary School Students (PhD thesis), Rawalpindi, University Institute of Education and Research; University of Arid Agriculture.
  • Gómez-Chacón, I. Mª, & Joglar, N. (2010). Developing competencies to teach exponential and logarithmic functions using GeoGebra from a holistic approach, Educação Matemática Pesquisa., São Paulo, 12(3), 485-513.
  • Goodwin, C.J. (2010). Research in Psychology: Methods and Design (6th Ed.) (pp. 176, 211-214). New York: John Wiley.
  • Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2012). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (9th Ed.). Wadsworth Publishing (pp. 416). Retrieved from http://craftx.org/sites/all/themes/craft_blue/pdf/Exploring_College_Textbook_Sample_2_p3.pdf
  • Hergenhahn, B. R., & Henley, T. B. (2013). An introduction to the history of Psychology (7th Ed.), Chapter No 4, p.111. USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Jena, P. C. (2013). Effect of Smart Classroom Learning Environment on Academic Achievement of Rural High Achievers and Low Achievers in Science. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 3, 1-9.
  • KPK Textbook Board. (2006). Mathematics II: Calculus with Analytic Geometry (pp. 219). Peshawar: The KPK Text Board.
  • Kushwaha, R. C., Chaurasia, P. K., & Singhal, A. (2013). Creating Dynamic Webpage for GeoGebra Quiz Applet; International Journal of Information and Computation Technology, 3(3), 175-180
  • Lew, H. (2004). Developing Algebraic Thinking in the Earlier Grades: A Case Study of the South Korean Elementary School Mathematics Curriculum. The Mathematics Educator, 8, 88-106.
  • Little, C. (2009). Differentiation in three easy, GeoGebra-style, lessons. MSOR Connections, 9(2), 27-30. https://doi.org/10.11120/msor.2009.09020027
  • Ljajko, E., & Ibro, V. (2013). Development of ideas in a GeoGebra – aided mathematics instruction. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.13054/mije.si.2013.01
  • National Curriculum for Mathematics. (2006). Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/curricula/pakistan/pk_al_mt_2006_eng.pdf
  • NCTM. (2000). Executive Summary Principles and Standards for School. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PSSM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf
  • Nestor, P. G. & Schutt, R. K. (2014). Research Methods in Psychology: Investigation Human Behavior (2nd Ed.), pp. 155-156.
  • Newby, P (2014). Research Methods for Education (2nd Ed) (pp.122-125). Pearson Education Ltd.
  • Özgün-Koca, S. A., & Meagher, M. (2012). Birth of a Virtual Manipulative .North American GeoGebra Journal, 1(1), 27-32.
  • Safdar, A. (2013). Effectiveness of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in Mathematics at Secondary Level (PhD Thesis), IIUI Pakistan.
  • Shimamoto, D. (2012). Implementing a Flipped Classroom: An Instructional Module. Retrieved from http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/22527

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.