International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Indexed in ESCI
Enhancing Students’ Understanding in Calculus Trough Writing
APA
In-text citation: (Idris, 2009)
Reference: Idris, N. (2009). Enhancing Students’ Understanding in Calculus Trough Writing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 36-55. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/229
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Idris N. Enhancing Students’ Understanding in Calculus Trough Writing. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2009;4(1), 36-55. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/229
Chicago
In-text citation: (Idris, 2009)
Reference: Idris, Noraini. "Enhancing Students’ Understanding in Calculus Trough Writing". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2009 4 no. 1 (2009): 36-55. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/229
Harvard
In-text citation: (Idris, 2009)
Reference: Idris, N. (2009). Enhancing Students’ Understanding in Calculus Trough Writing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), pp. 36-55. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/229
MLA
In-text citation: (Idris, 2009)
Reference: Idris, Noraini "Enhancing Students’ Understanding in Calculus Trough Writing". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 4, no. 1, 2009, pp. 36-55. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/229
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Idris N. Enhancing Students’ Understanding in Calculus Trough Writing. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2009;4(1):36-55. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/229

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of using writing activities on students’ understanding and achievement in Calculus. The design of this study was quasi-experimental. The subjects of this study consisted of two secondary schools in one of the states in Malaysia. Each school was assigned one intact class of Form Four to be the experimental group and another one intact class as the control. The experimental group learned mathematics by using the writing activities for five weeks, while the control group learned mathematics by using traditional whole-class instruction. A 20-item Calculus Achievement test was designed with reliability .87. The findings showed that the experimental group exhibited significantly greater improvement on calculus achievement. The students showed positive reaction towards the use of writing. Findings of this study provide information to schools to take advantage of writing activities to promote understanding.

References

  • Allen, N. B. R. (1992). A study of metacognitive skills as influenced by expressive writing in college introductory algebra classes. Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University. Dissertation Abstracts Internationa, 53, 432A.
  • Bell, E. S. & Bell, R. N. (1985). Writing and mathematical problem solving: Arguments in favour of synthesis. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 210 - 221.
  • Borasi, R. & Rose, B. J. (1989). Journal writing and mathematics instructions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 347- 65.
  • Brophy, J. (1987,). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, October pp. 40 - 48.
  • Burton, L. & Morgan, C. (2000). Mathematicians writing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 420 - 453.
  • Countryman, J. (1992). Writing to learn mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Dougherty, B. J. (1996). The write way: A look at journal writing in first-year algebra. Mathematics Teacher, 8, 556 -560.
  • Gordon, S. (1997). Functioning in the Real World: A Precalculus Experience. New York: Addison Wesley.
  • Guckin, A. M. (1992). The role of mathematics informal writing in college mathematics Instruction. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 2819A.
  • Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed)., handbooks for research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65 -97). New York: MacMillan.
  • Hiebert, J. & Lefevre, P.(1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics. An Introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics (pp. 1- 27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kazemi, E. (1998). Discourse that promotes conceptual understanding. Teaching Children Mathematics, pp. 410 - 414.
  • LeGere, A. (1991). Collaboration and writing in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Teacher, 21, pp. 166 - 71.
  • Lepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational consideration in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 4, pp. 289 - 309.
  • Luitel, B. C. (2002). Developing and probing understanding in mathematics. [On-line serial] Available at http://au.geocities.com/bcluitel/vijaya
  • Malaysian Ministry of Education. (1996). Huraian sukatan pelajaran matematik KBSM Tingkatan3 [Form 3 KBSM Mathematics Syllabus]. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Centre.
  • Malaysian Ministry of Education. (2000). Huraian sukatan pelajaran matematik KBSM Tingkatan4 [Form 4 KBSM Mathematics Syllabus]. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Centre.
  • Mayer, J. & Hillman, S. (1996). Assessing students’ thinking through writing. Mathematics Teacher, 89, pp. 428 -432.
  • McIntosh, M. E. & Draper, R. J. (2001). Using learning logs in mathematics: Writing to learn. Mathematics Teacher, 94(7), pp. 554 - 557.
  • Miller, L. D. (1992). Begin mathematics class with writing. Mathematics Teacher, 85(5), pp. 354 - 355.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: VA: Author.
  • Noraini Idris. (1999). Linguistic aspects of mathematical education: How precise do Teachers need to be? In M. A. Clements & Y. P. Leong (Eds.), Cultural and language aspects of science, mathematics and technical education. Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
  • Noraini Idris (2000). Role of Writing in Understanding Mathematical Concept: A Pilot Study. Journal of Educational Research, Malaysian Ministry of Education, Vol. 2, pp. 1-10.
  • Noraini Idris (2006). Pedagogy in Mathematics Education. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan.
  • Noraini Idris. (2007). Teaching and learning of Mathematics: Making Sense and Developing Cognitives. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan.
  • Oaks, A. & Rose, B. (1992). Writing as a tool for expanding student conception of mathematics. Paper presented at the 7th International Congress on Mathematics Education. Working Group 7: Language and Communication in the Classroom, Quebec.
  • Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of differentiation. Educational Studies In Mathematics, 14, 235 -250.
  • Perkins, D. & Blythe, T. (1994). Putting understanding up front. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 4 -7.
  • Prus-Wisniowska, E. A. (1996). Cognitive, metocognitive, and social aspects of mathematical proof with respect to calculus. Unpublished Disseration University Of Szczcin, Poland.
  • Pugalee, D. (1997). Connecting writing to the mathematics curriculum. Mathematics Teacher, 90, pp. 308 -310.
  • Robinson, E. A. (1996). The dynamical properties of Penrose tiling, Translational. American Mathematics Society.
  • Skemp, R. R. (1979). Intelligence, learning, and action. New York: Wiley.
  • Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching 77, 20 – 26.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. New York: Plenum Press.
  • White, P. & Mitchelmore, M. (1996). Conceptual knowledge in introductory calculus. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 79 – 95.
  • Wong, K. Y. (1984). Mathematical understanding: An exploration of theory and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Education, University of Queensland..

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.