Research has shown that a profound place value understanding is crucial for success in learning mathematics. At the same time, a substantial number of students struggles with developing a sustainable place value understanding. In this regard, two aspects of the place value system appear especially relevant: First, the knowledge of the decimal structure of numbers, and second, the relation between the bundling units. To support teaching place value understanding, a developmental model of place value understanding focusing on both aspects has been constructed and validated in Germany. The model comprises five levels of place value understanding that build upon each other hierarchically. This study aims at validating the level hierarchy in Turkey to prepare the usage of the developmental model as learning trajectory for Turkish primary schools.
N=437 Turkish students from Grades 2 through 4 completed a translated version of the item collection of the German validation study as well as a Turkish place value test that is not based on a developmental model. In a Rasch analysis, most items of the translated item collection showed item difficulties as predicted by the model. In a regression analysis, item difficulties were well predicted by their allocation within the level hierarchy, while other item characteristics did not inform about the item difficulties. Substantial correlations between the translated item collection and the Turkish test underpin the claim that the model is appropriate to assess Turkish students’ place value understanding as well as structuring place value instruction in Turkish primary schools.

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

• Balt, M., Fritz, A., & Ehlert, A. (2020). Insights into first grade students’ development of conceptual numerical understanding as drawn from progression-based assessments. Frontiers in Education, 5, 80. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00080
• Battista, M. T. (2011). Conceptualizations and issues related to learning progressions, learning trajectories, and levels of sophistication. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(3), 507-570. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol8/iss3/5
• Boulton-Lewis, G. M. (1998). Children’s strategy use and interpretations of mathematical representations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80060-3
• Byrge, L., Smith, L. B., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Beginnings of place value: How preschoolers write three-digit numbers. Child Development, 85(2), 437-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12162
• Chan, W. W. L., Au, T. K., & Tang, J. (2014). Strategic counting: A novel assessment of place-value understanding. Learning and Instruction, 29, 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.001
• Clarke, B., Cheeseman, J., & Clarke, D. (2006). The mathematical knowledge and understanding young children bring to school. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217430
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_1
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. H. (2014). Learning trajectories: Foundations for effective, research-based education. In A. P. Maloney, J. Confrey, & K. H. Nguyen (Eds.), Learning over time (pp. 1-30). Information Age.
• Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. H., & Liu, X. H. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: the Research-Based Early Maths Assessment. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 457-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701777272
• Cobb, P., & Wheatley, G. (1988). Children’s initial understandings of ten. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 10(3), 1-28.
• Confrey, J. (2006). The evolution of design studies as methodology. In K. R. Sawyer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 135-152). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.010
• Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press.
• Dietrich, J. F., Huber, S., Dackermann, T., Moeller, K., & Fischer, U. (2016). Place-value understanding in number line estimation predicts future arithmetic performance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 502-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12146
• Dowker, A., & Roberts, M. (2015). Does the transparency of the counting system affect children’s numerical abilities? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00945
• Downton, A., Russo, J., & Hopkins, S. (2020). Students’ understanding of the associative property and its applications: Noticing, doubling and halving, and place value. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00351-w
• Fritz, A., Ehlert, A., & Leutner, D. (2018). Arithmetische Konzepte aus kognitiv-entwicklungspsychologischer Sicht [Arithmetic concepts from a cognitive-developmental psychological point of view]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 39(1), 7-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-018-0131-6
• Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Hiebert, J. C., Murray, H. G., Human, P. G., Olivier, A. I., Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1997). Children’s Conceptual Structures for Multidigit Numbers and Methods of Multidigit Addition and Subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(2), 130-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/749759
• Gebhardt, M., Zehner, F., & Hessels M. G. P. (2014). Basic arithmetical skills of students with learning disabilities in the secondary special schools. An exploratory study covering fifth to ninth grade. Frontline Learning Research, 3, 50-63. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i1.73
• Gervasoni, A., & Sullivan, P. (2007). Assessing and teaching children who have difficulty learning arithmetic. Educational & Child Psychology, 24(2), 40-53.
• Gotwals, A. W. (2018). Where are we now? Learning progressions and formative assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(2), 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408626
• Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_3
• Hart, K. (2009). Why do we expect so much? In J. Novotná, & H. Moraova (Eds.), SEMT 2009. International Symposium Elementary Maths Teaching. August 23 – 28, 2009. Proceedings: The Development of Mathematical Understanding (pp. 24-31). Charles University.
• Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. http://www.ccsso.org/documents/2008/learning_progressions_ supporting_2008.pdf
• Herzog, M. & Fritz, A. (2019). Validation of a Developmental Model of Place Value Concepts. In Graven, M., Venkat, H., Essien, A. & Vale, P. (Eds). (2019). Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp.352-359). Pretoria, South Africa: PME
• Herzog, M., Ehlert, A., & Fritz, A. (2017). A competency model of place value understanding in South African primary school pupils. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1279453
• Herzog, M., Ehlert, A., & Fritz, A. (2019). Development of a Sustainable Place Value Understanding. In A. Fritz, V. G. Haase, & P. Räsänen (Eds.), International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties (pp. 561-579). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_33
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Houdement, C., & Tempier, F. (2019). Understanding place value with numeration units. ZDM, 51(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0985-6
• Imbo, I., Vanden Bulcke, C., De Brauwer, J., & Fias, W. (2014). Sixty-four or four-and-sixty? The influence of language and working memory on children’s number transcoding. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00313
• Klein, E., Bahnmueller, J., Mann, A., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., Nuerk, H.-C., & Moeller, K. (2013). Language influences on numerical development—Inversion effects on multi-digit number processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 480. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00480
• Ladel, S., & Kortenkamp, U. (2016). Development of a flexible understanding of place value. In T. Meaney, O. Helenius, M.-L. Johansson, T. Lange, & A. Wernberg (Eds.), Mathematics education in the early years - Results from the POEM2 Conference (pp. 289-307). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23935-4_16
• Lambert, K., & Moeller, K. (2019). Place-value computation in children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 178, 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.008
• Laski, E. V., Ermakova, A., & Vasilyeva, M. (2014). Early use of decomposition for addition and its relation to base-10 knowledge. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 444-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.07.002
• Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 878.
• Lonnemann, J., & Yan, S. (2015). Does number word inversion affect arithmetic processes in adults? Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4(1-2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2015.01.002
• MacDonald, A. (2008). But what about the Oneths? A year 7 Student’s misconception about decimal place value. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 64(4), 12-15.
• McGuire, P., & Kinzie, M. B. (2013). Analysis of place value instruction and development in pre- kindergarten mathematics. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(5), 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0580-y
• Ministry of Education (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Mathematics lesson curriculum (primary and secondary school 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades) curriculum].
• Moloney, K., & Stacey, K. (1997). Changes with age in students’ conceptions of decimal notation. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217300
• Moura, R., Wood, G., Pinheiro-Chagas, P., Lonnemann, J., Krinzinger, H., Willmes, K., & Haase, V. G. (2013). Transcoding abilities in typical and atypical mathematics achievers: The role of working memory and procedural and lexical competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(3), 707-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.008
• Mutlu, Y., & Sarı, M.H. (2019). İlkokul öğrencilerinin basamak değeri kavrayışlarının geliştirilmesi [Developing primary school students’ understanding of place value]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(2), 657-667. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2645
• Nataraj, M. S., & Thomas, M. O. (2007). Developing the concept of place value. In J. Watson, & K. Beswick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 2, pp. 523-532). MERGA Inc.
• OECD (2019), PISA 2018 results (Volume II): Where all students can succeed, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en
• Olkun, S., Reçber, H., Ata, A., Özer, E., & Çelebi, Ö. (2011). Türk çocuklarının bilişsel sayı temsilinin Çinli, Fransız, Japon, Koreli, İsveçli ve Amerikalı yaşıtlarıyla karşılaştırılması [Comparison of Turkish children’s cognitive number representation with their Chinese, French, Japanese, Korean, Swedish and American peers]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001216
• Paydar, S., & Sarı, M. H. (2019). İlkokul ikinci ve üçüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin basamak değeri kavrayışları [Place value perceptions of primary school second and third grade students]. In S. Olkun (Ed.), İlköğretim çalışmaları bütünsel açıdan çocuk (pp. 97-116). Pegem Academy Publishing. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786058011410.06
• Paydar, S., Doğan, A., & Şahin, A. E. (2019). An analysis of primary first grade students’ readiness in natural numbers. Elementary Education Online, 18(3), 1059-1072. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.610645
• Primary School Mathematics Curriculum (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Mathematics lesson curriculum (primary and secondary school 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades) curriculum]. Ankara: MEB Press.
• Reiss, K., & Obersteiner, A. (2019). Competence models as a basis for defining, understanding, and diagnosing students’ mathematical competences. In A. Fritz, V. G. Haase, & P. Räsänen (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematical Learning Difficulties (pp. 43-56). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_4
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In R. C. Kadosh, & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1118-1134). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014
• Ross, S. H. (1989). Parts, wholes, and place value: A developmental view. The Arithmetic Teacher, 36(6,), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.36.6.0047
• Sarı, M. H., & Olkun, S. (2019). Relationship between place value understanding, arithmetic performance and mathematics achievement in general. İlköğretim Online, 18(2), 953-958. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.562086
• Sarı, M. H., & Olkun, S. (2021). The relationships among number line estimations, mathematics achievement and place value understanding. Journal of Education and Future, 19, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.729843
• Schulz, A., Leuders, T., & Rangel, U. (2020). The use of a diagnostic competence model about children’s operation sense for criterion-referenced individual feedback in a large-scale formative assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(4), 426-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918823590
• Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Children’s thinking (4th ed). Pearson Education/Prentice Hall.
• Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12442801
• Van de Walle, J., Karp, K., & Bay-Williams, J. (2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modelling approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Wright, R. J., Ellemor-Collins, D., & Lewis, G. (2007). Developing pedagogical tools for intervention: Approach, methodology, and an experimental framework. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice (Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, Vol. 2, pp. 843-852). MERGA.
• Zuber, J., Pixner, S., Moeller, K., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2009). On the language specificity of basic number processing: Transcoding in a language with inversion and its relation to working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(1), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.003
• Zwick, R., Thayer, D. T., & Lewis, C. (1999). An empirical Bayes approach to Mantel-Haenszel DIF analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1999.tb00543.x

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.