Submit Manuscript

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers
Yeni Yuniarti, Yaya S. Kusumah, Didi Suryadi, Bana G. Kartasasmita
APA
In-text citation: (Yuniarti et al., 2017)
Reference: Yuniarti, Y., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2017). The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/640
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Yuniarti Y, Kusumah YS, Suryadi D, Kartasasmita BG. The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2017;12(3), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/640
Chicago
In-text citation: (Yuniarti et al., 2017)
Reference: Yuniarti, Yeni, Yaya S. Kusumah, Didi Suryadi, and Bana G. Kartasasmita. "The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2017 12 no. 3 (2017): 655-666. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/640
Harvard
In-text citation: (Yuniarti et al., 2017)
Reference: Yuniarti, Y., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., and Kartasasmita, B. G. (2017). The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), pp. 655-666. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/640
MLA
In-text citation: (Yuniarti et al., 2017)
Reference: Yuniarti, Yeni et al. "The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 12, no. 3, 2017, pp. 655-666. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/640
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Yuniarti Y, Kusumah YS, Suryadi D, Kartasasmita BG. The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2017;12(3):655-66. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/640

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the achievement of mathematical creative thinking ability of pre-service elementary school teachers who received open-ended problems based analytic-synthetic learning and conventional learning. This study is a quasi-experimental research with pretest-posttest control group design to pre-service elementary school teachers in a state university of West Java with 136 students divided into two groups of research subjects, of 68 students each. The instrument used in this research are prior mathematical knowledge test, mathematical creative thinking ability tests, and interview guidance. The results of data analysis using statistic of parametric and non-parametric showed that: 1) The Achievement mathematical creative thinking ability of  students who received open-ended problems based learning analytic-synthetic better than those conventional learning is reviewed whole and each level prior mathematical knowledge as well; 2) the effect size of open-ended problems based analytic-synthetic learning on the achievement of students' mathematical creative thinking ability in high category. The research recommended that open-ended problems based analytic-synthetic learning can be used achievement of mathematical creative thinking ability.

Keywords

Creative thinking open-ended analytic-synthetic learning

References

  • Arikunto, S. (2005). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  • Badan Standardisasi Nasional Pendidikan (BSNP). (2006). Pedoman penyusunan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
  • Celik, D. & dan Arslan, A.S. (2012). The Analysis of Teacher Candidates’ Translating Skills in Multiple Representations. Elementary Education Online, 11(1), 239-250.
  • Chamberlin, S.A. & Moon, S.M. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as tool to develop and identify creativity gifted mathematicians. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37–47.
  • Chareka, O. (2010). A matter of prior knowledge: Canadian young children’s conceptions about the future in the global community. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(2), 287-303.
  • Craig, J. (2015). Assessing the Relationship between Questioning and Understanding to Improve Learning and Thinking (QUILT) and Student Achievement in Mathematics: A Pilot Study. Virginia: Charleston.
  • Hailikari, T. (2009). Assessing University Students’Prior Knowledge. Implications for Theory and Practice. Helsinki: Helsinki University Print.
  • Hyman, B. (1993). Measuring What Counts: A Conceptual Guide for Mathematics Assessment. Washington: National Academies Press.
  • Kartini. (2011). Peningkatan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif serta Belief Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Model Alberta. Diterbitkan: SPS UPI.
  • Khoiri, W., Rochmad, A. & Cahyono, A.N. (2013). Problem Based Learning berbantuan Multimedia dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 114-121.
  • Kumiati. (2014). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematis serta Soft Skill Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru SD melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Diterbitkan: SPS UPI.
  • Kwon, O.N., Park, J.S & Park, J.H. (2006). Cultivating Divergent Thinking in Mathematics through an Open-Ended Approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51-61.
  • Lee, I.R. & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice Teachers' Personality Traits and Engagement in Creative Activities as Predictors of Their Support for Children's Creativity. Creativity Research journal. 26(1). 82-94.
  • Mann, E.L. (2005). Mathematical Creativity and School Mathematics: Indicators of Mathematical Creativity in Middle School Students. Direct access: http://www.gifted. uconn.edu/Siegle/
  • Mann, E.L. (2006). Creativity: The Essence of Mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–260.
  • Mulyana, T. (2008). Pembelajaran Analitik Sintetik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematik Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Diterbitkan: SPS UPI.
  • Munandar, U. (2014). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta:  Rineka Cipta.
  • Munandar, U. (2003). Kreativitas & Keberbakatan. Strategi Mewujudkan potensi kreatif & Bakat. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  • Nadjafikhah, M. & Yaftian, N. (2013). The frontage of Creativity and Mathematical Creativity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 344-350.
  • Nadjafikhah, M., Yaftian, N. & Bakhshalizadeh, S. (2012). Mathematical creativity: some definitions and characteristics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 285-291.
  • National Research Council. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, James W. Pellegrino and Margaret L. Hilton, Editors. Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington: The National Academies Press.
  • Neumann, C.J. (2007). Fostering creativity—A model for developing a culture of collective creativity in science. EMBO Reports, 8(3), 202–206.
  • Noer, S.H. (2011). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis dan Pembelajaran matematika Berbasis masalah Open-Ended. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 104 – 111.
  • Nohda, N. (2000). Teaching by Open-Approach Method in Japanese Mathematics Classroom. Proceedings of the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1, 23-27.
  • Risnanosanti. (2010). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis dan Self Efficacy terhadap Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) dalam pembelajaran Inquiri. Diterbitkan: SPS UPI.
  • Shahrill, M. & Clarke, D.J. (2014). Brunei Teachers’ Perspectives on Questioning: Investigating the Opportunities to “Talk” in Mathematics Lessons. International Education Studies, 7(7), 1-17.
  • Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness & creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20–36.
  • Starko, A.J. (2014). Creativity in the Classroom Schools of Curious Delight. New York: Routledge.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (2006). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal. 18(1), 87–98.
  • Suastika, K. (2017). Mathematics Learning Model of Open Problem Solving to Develop Students’ Creativity. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 12(6), 569-577.
  • Supriadi. (2014). Mengembangkan Kemampuan dan Disposisi Pemodelan serta Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Mahasiswa PGSD melalui Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbasis Etnomatematika. Diterbitkan: SPS UPI.
  • Suryana, A. (2016). Meningkatkan Advanced Mathematical Thinking dan Self Renewal Capacity Mahasiswa melalui Pembelajaran Model PACE. Pendidikan: Universities Pendidikan.
  • Trilling, B. & dan Fadel, C. (2009). 21 st Century Skill: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
  • Yaqoob, M. (2012). Developing Creative Thinking: Using a Cognitive Teaching Model in Literature Classroom. The International Journal of Learning. 18(6), 71-82.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
e-ISSN: 1306-3030 | Publisher: Modestum Publishing LTD