International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Ainsworth, S. E., Bibby, P. A., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Information technology and multiple representations: New opportunities–new problems. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 6(1), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759399700200006
• Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2004). Convergence of sequences and series: Interactions between visual reasoning and the learner’s beliefs about their own role. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000047051.07646.92
• Alshwaikh, J. (2008). Reading’geometrical diagrams: A suggested framework. Proceedings of the British Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 1-6.
• Arcavi, A., & Hadas, N. (2000). Computer mediated learning: An example of an approach. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009841817245
• Baergen, R. (2006). Historical dictionary of epistemology. The Scarecrow Press.
• Barbieri, C. A., & Booth, J. L. (2020). Mistakes on display: Incorrect examples refine equation solving and algebraic feature knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(4), 862-878. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3663
• Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
• Behr, M. J., Lesh, R., Post, T. R., & Silver, E. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. Lesh, & M. Landau (Eds.) Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 92-127). Academic Press.
• Bieda, K. N., Bowers, D. M., & Küchle, V. (2020). The genre(s) of argumentation in school mathematics. Michigan Reading Journal, 51(2), 41-52.
• Bingölbali, E., & Coşkun, M. (2016). A proposed conceptual framework for enhancing the use of making connections skill in mathematics teaching. TED Eğitim ve Bilim, 41(183), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.4764
• Bingölbali, E., & Özmantar, M. F. (2014). Matematiksel zorluklar ve çözüm önerileri. Matematiksel kavram yanılgıları: Sebepleri ve çözüm arayışları [Mathematical difficulties and solution suggestions. Misconceptions in mathematical concepts: Causes and search for solutions]. Pegem Akademi.
• Bofferding, L. (2014). Negative integer understanding: Characterizing first graders’ mental models. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(2), 194-245. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.2.0194
• Borasi, R. (1994). Capitalizing on errors as “Springboards for inquiry”: A teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 166-208. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.25.2.0166
• Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving mathematics instruction: A focus on errors. Ablex Publishing.
• Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b105001
• Borwein, P., & Jorgenson, L. (2001). Visible structures in number theory. The American Mathematical Monthly, 108(10), 897-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2001.11919824
• Bray, W. S. (2013). How to leverage the potential of mathematical errors. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(7), 424-431. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.19.7.0424
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Belknap Press of Harvard University.
• Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., Sasselov, D., & Fredericks, C. (2020). The impact of student misconceptions on student persistence in a MOOC. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 879-910. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21616
• Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1
• Chin, K. E., & Jiew, F. F. (2020). Knowing and grasping of two university students: The case of complex numbers. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 17(1), 273-306. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1487
• Doruk, M., & Çiltaş, A. (2020). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ concept definitions and examples regarding sets. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(2), 21-36.
• Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg T. (1996). On different facets of mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg, & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 253-284). Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Duncan, A. G. (2010). Teachers’ views on dynamically linked multiple representations, pedagogical practices and students’ understanding of mathematics using TI-Nspire in Scottish secondary schools. ZDM, 42(7), 763-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0273-6
• Duran, M., Doruk, M., & Kaplan, A. (2017). Argümantasyon tabanlı olasılık öğretiminin ortaokul öğrencilerinin başarılarına ve kaygılarına etkililiğinin incelenmesi[Investigating the effectiveness of argumentation-based probability teaching on middle school students' achievement and anxiety]. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 13(1), 55-87.
• Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.001
• Durkin, K., Star, J. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017). Using comparison of multiple strategies in the mathematics classroom: Lessons learned and next steps. ZDM- Mathematics Education, 49(4), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0853-9
• Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 103-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
• Eli, J. A. (2009). An exploratory mixed methods study of prospective middle grades teachers’ mathematical connections while completing investiagtive tasks in geometry [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky]. University of Kentucky. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/781
• Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of functions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 105-121. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)80063-7
• Fischbein, E., Jehiam, R., & Cohen, D. (1995). The concept of irrational numbers in high-school students and prospective teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273899
• Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 3-17.
• Fraenkel, J. K., & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). The McGraw-Hill Company.
• Friedlander, A., & Tabach, M. (2001). Promoting multiple representations in algebra. In A. A. Cuoco, & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The role of representation in school mathematics (pp. 173-185). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Gedik, S. D., Konyalıoğlu, A. C., Tuncer, E. B., & Morkoyunlu, Z. (2017). Mistake handling activities in mathematics education: Practice in class. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(2), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v6n2a9
• Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Harvard University Press.
• George, E. A. (1997). Reasoning with visual representations: Students’ use of diagrams, figures, and graphs in solving problems on the advanced placement calculus examination [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburg]. University of Pittsburg.
• Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The role of visual representations in the learning and teaching of science: An introduction. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 1-19.
• Goldin G. A., & Kaput J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 397-430). Erlbaum.
• Goldin, G. A. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 197-218). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Goldin, G. A., & Shteingold, N. (2001). Systems of representation and the development of mathematical concepts. In A. A. Cuoco, & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The role of representation in school mathematics (pp. 1- 23). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 361-367. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20405797
• Gutiérrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimensional geometry: In search of a framework. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th PME Conference (pp. 56-79).
• Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-60752-874-620251006
• Hughes-Hallett, D., Lock, P. F., & Gleason, A. (2010). Applied Calculus, ConcepTests. John Wiley & Sons.
• Ifrah, G. (2000). The universal history of numbers. Harvill.
• Janvier, C., Girardon, C., & Morand, J. (1993). Mathematical symbols and representations. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 79-102). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Johnson, A. P. (2008). A short guide to action research. Allyn and Bacon.
• Kalaç, S., Özkaya, M., & Konyalıoğlu, A. C. (2024). Mathematics teachers’ experiences of positive error climate. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 38, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.38.1832
• Kaufmann, O. T., Larsson, M., & Ryve, A. (2023). Teachers’ error-handling practices within and across lesson phases in the mathematics classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(4), 1289-1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10294-2
• Keçeli, V., & Turanlı, N. (2013). Misconceptions and common errors in complex numbers. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(1), 223-234.
• Kidron, I. (2018). Students’ conceptions of irrational numbers. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 94-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0071-z
• Kieren, T. E. (1993). Rational and fractional numbers: From quotient field to recursive understanding. In T.P. Carperten, E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp.49-84). Erlbaum.
• Kotsopoulos, D., & Cordy, M. (2009). Investigating imagination as a cognitive space for learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9154-0
• Lesh, R. (1979). Mathematical learning disabilities: Considerations for identification, diagnosis and remediaton. In R. Lesh, D. Mierkiewicz, & M. G. Kantowski (Eds.), Applied mathematical problem solving (pp. 111-180). ERIC/SMEAC.
• Lesh, R., Behr, M., & Post, T. R. (1987). Rational number relations and proportions. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 41-58). Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Mamona-Downs, J. (2001). Letting the intuitive bear on the formal; a didactical approach for the understanding of the limit of a sequence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 259-288. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016004822476
• Narlı, S. (2016). İlişkilendirme becerisi ve muhtevası [Mathematical connections skill and its components]. In E. Bingölbalı, S. Arslan & İ. Ö. Zembat (Eds.), Matematik eğitiminde teoriler (pp. 231-244). Pegem Akademi.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
• Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
• Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
• Nordlander, M. C., & Nordlander, E. (2012). On the concept image of complex numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(5), 627-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.633629
• Noss, R., Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (1997). The construction of mathematical meanings: Connecting the visual with the symbolic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(2), 203-233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002943821419
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Evans, D., Bell, D., Gardner, S., Gardner, A., & Carraher, J. (2007). The contribution of logical reasoning to the learning of mathematics in primary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(1), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151006X153127
• Oktaviyanthi, R., & Agus, R. N. (2019). Exploration of students’ problem solving abilities based on the category of mathematical literacy processes [in Bahasa]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.13.2.7066.163-184
• Oliver, M. (2011). Teaching and learning evolution: Testing the principles of a constructivist approach through action research. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 57(1), 13-18.
• Panaoura, A., Elia, I., Gagatsis, A., & Giatilis, G.-P. (2006). Geometric and algebraic approaches in the concept of complex numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(6), 681-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390600712281
• Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4002_6
• Parviainen, J., & Eriksson, M. (2006). Negative knowledge, expertise and organisations. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(2), 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCP.2006.010265
• Peled, I. (1999). Difficulties in knowledge integration: Revisiting Zeno’s paradox with irrational numbers. International Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 30(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/002073999288094
• Piaget, J., & Petit, N. (1971) Seis estudios de psicología. Seix Barral.
• Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualisation and mathematical giftedness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 297-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305075
• Rau, M. A., & Matthews, P. G. (2017). How to make ‘more’ better? Principles for effective use of multiple representations to enhance students’ learning about fractions. ZDM, 49(4), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0846-8
• Rumsey, C., & Langrall, C. W. (2016). Promoting mathematical argumentation. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(7), 412-419. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.22.7.0412
• Ryken, A. E. (2009). Multiple representations as sites for teacher reflection about mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9107-2
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-60752-874-620251019
• Schultz, J. E., & Waters, M. (2000). Discuss with your colleagues: Why representations? Mathematics Teachers, 93(6), 448-453. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.93.6.0448
• Sedig, K., & Sumner, M. (2006). Characterizing interaction with visual mathematical representations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-006-0001-z
• Seeger, F. (1998). Representations in the mathematics classroom: Reflections and constructions. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 308-343). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720406.013
• Singer, F. M. (2009). The dynamic infrastructure of mind – A hypothesis and some of its applications. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(1), 48-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2008.04.007
• Smith, J. P., Disessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.
• Stylianou, D. A. (2010). Teachers’ conceptions of representation in middle school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(4), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9143-y
• Tall, D. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), The psychology of advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 3-21). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_1
• Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619
• Umay, A. (2007). Eski arkadaşımız okul matematiğinin yeni yüzü [Our old friend: The new face of school mathematics]. Aydan Web Tesisleri.
• Vale, C., McAndrew, A., & Krishnan, S. (2011). Connecting with the horizon: Developing teachers’ appreciation of mathematical structure. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9162-8
• Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2010). How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 181-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370001003676603
• Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. (2012). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
• Vlassis, J. (2004). Making sense of the minus sign or becoming flexible in ‘negativity’. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.012
• Voskoglou, M. G., & Kosyvas, G. (2011). A study on the comprehension of irrational numbers. Quadernidi Ricerca in Didattica (Scienze Mathematiche), 21, 127-141.
• Whitenack, J. W., & Knipping, N. (2002). Argumentation, instructional design theory and students’ mathematical learning: A case for coordinating interpretive lenses. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00144-X
• Wood, D. (1988). Learning how to think and learn. In How children think. Basil Blackwell.
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458
• Zazkis, R. (2005). Representing numbers: Prime and irrational. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(2-3), 207-217.
• Zazkis, R., & Sirotic, N. (2004). Making sense of ırrational numbers: Focusing on representation. In Proceedings of 28th International Conference for Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 497-505).
• Zazkis, R., & Sirotic, N. (2010). Representing and defining irrational numbers: Exposing the missing link. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 7, 1-27.
• Zembat, İ. Ö. (2010). Kavram yanılgısı nedir? [What is a misconception?]. In E. Bingölbali, & M. F. Özmantar ve H. Akkoç. (Eds.), Matematiksel kavram yanılgıları ve çözüm önerileri (pp. 1-8). Pegem Akademi.
• Zimmerman, W., & Cunningham, S. (1991). Editor’s introduction: What is mathematical visualization? In W. Zimerman, & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 1-7). MAA.

APA

Doruk, M., & Bayram Gün, G. M. (2026). The effect of the error-based activities incorporating argumentation on errors in the external visual representations of pre-service teachers: An action research. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 21(2), em0872. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18097

Vancouver

Doruk M, Bayram Gün GM. The effect of the error-based activities incorporating argumentation on errors in the external visual representations of pre-service teachers: An action research. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2026;21(2):em0872. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18097

AMA

Doruk M, Bayram Gün GM. The effect of the error-based activities incorporating argumentation on errors in the external visual representations of pre-service teachers: An action research. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2026;21(2), em0872. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18097

Chicago

Doruk, Muhammet, and Gül Mine Bayram Gün. "The effect of the error-based activities incorporating argumentation on errors in the external visual representations of pre-service teachers: An action research". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2026 21 no. 2 (2026): em0872. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18097

Harvard

Doruk, M., and Bayram Gün, G. M. (2026). The effect of the error-based activities incorporating argumentation on errors in the external visual representations of pre-service teachers: An action research. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 21(2), em0872. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18097

MLA

Doruk, Muhammet et al. "The effect of the error-based activities incorporating argumentation on errors in the external visual representations of pre-service teachers: An action research". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 21, no. 2, 2026, em0872. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18097