The Comparison between Two Hypnoteaching Models in Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Ja’faruddin; Hamzah Upu; Chen Wen-Haw; Daniel Chia-En Teng

doi:10.29333/iejme/8480

Full Text (PDF)

Ja’faruddin ¹ ² ^* , Hamzah Upu ¹, Chen Wen-Haw ², Daniel Chia-En Teng ²

More Detail

¹ Universitas Negeri Makassar, INDONESIA² Tunghai University, TAIWAN^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study compares two hypnoteaching models used to teach students mathematics. Due to the increase in the use of these models, further vigorous studies are needed to verify their effects. This is a quasi-experiment research conducted to compare the use of the hypnoteaching model using three classes of students. The first, second, and third classes of 15, 13, and 15 students were randomly taught with the Erickson Hypnoteaching Model (Erickson-HM), Elman Hypnoteaching Model (Elman-HM), and conventional non-hypnoteaching model (CM), respectively. The results showed that students in the Erickson-HM group outperformed others, while those in the Elman-HM group performed better than their peers in the CM group. In addition, students in both hypnoteaching groups had higher motivation in learning than those in the CM group. Therefore, discussions and suggestions on hypnoteaching of math were proposed.

Keywords

hypnoteaching
Erickson Hypnoteaching Model
Elman Hypnoteaching Model
Mathematics education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, Volume 15, Issue 3, October 2020, Article No: em0607

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8480

Publication date: 29 Aug 2020

Article Views: 2934

Article Downloads: 1789

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Aarnoudse-Moens, C., Weisglas-Kuperus, N., HJ, D., van, G. J., & Oosterlaan, J. (2013). Executive Function and IQ Predict Mathematical and Attention Problems in Very Preterm Children. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e55994. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055994
Asteria, P. V., Rohmah, S. K., & Renhoran, F. Z. (2017). Penerapan Metode Hypnoteaching dalam Pembelajaran Bermain Peran Siswa Kelas V SDN Lidah Kulon IV Kecamatan Lakarsantri Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan (Teori dan Praktik), 2(2), 150-155. https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v2n2.p150-155
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1975). Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. Vol. I. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications.
Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs into Princess. Moab, UT: Real People Press.
Bester, G., & Brand, L. (2013). The effect of technology on learner attention and achievement in the classroom. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v33n2a405
Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008). Short-Term Memory, Working Memory, and Executive Functioning in Preschoolers: Longitudinal Predictors of Mathematical Achievement at Age 7 Years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640801982312
Burrows, G., Stanley, R., & Bloom, P. (2001). International Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis. Chichester, UK: John Willey & Sons Ltd.
Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1993). The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize your Brain’s. London: BBC Books.
David, A. O., & Peter, W. (2009). Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(6), 264-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.004
Elman, D. (1977). Hypnotherapy. Glendale, US: Westwood Publishing Co.
Erickson, M. (1980). Method employed to formulate a complex story for the induction of an experimental neurosis in a hypnotic subject. In E. L. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Milton H. Erickson on Hypnosis, Vol. 3: Hypnotic Investigation of Psychodynamic Processes (pp. 26-33). Irvington, New York.
Erickson, M. H., Rossi, E. L., & Rossi, S. I. (1976). Hypnotic Realities: The Induction of Clinical Hypnosis and Forms of Indirect Suggest. Irvington, New York.
Erickson, M., & Rossi, E. (1980). Indirect forms of suggestion. In E. L. Rossi, The Collected Papers of Milton H. Erickson on Hypnosis: Vol. 1 The Nature of Hypnosis and Suggestion (pp. 452-477). Irvington, New York.
Forman, E. A., McCormick, D., & Donato, R. (1998). Learning what counts as a mathematical explanation. Linguistics and Education, 9(4), 313-339.
Geary, D. C. (2010). Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 130-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.008
Goldberg, B. (2006). Self Hypnosis. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: B-First.
Goldin, G. (2002). Beliefs: a hidden variable in mathematics education? In G. Leder, W. Pehkonen, & G. E. Torner, Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical beliefs structures. (pp. 59-72). London: Kluwer Academics Publisher.
Gunawan, A. W. (2007). Hypnosis The Art of Subconscious Communication. Jakarta, Indonesia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hale, G., & Lewis, M. (1979). Attention and Cognitive Development. New York, US: Plenum Press.
Haley, J. (1973). Uncommon Therapy: The Psychiatric Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. Norton, New York.
Hamzah, U., & Ja’faruddin. (2019). The Application Hypnoteaching in Mathematics Education. The 3rd International Conference on Statistics, Mathematics, Teaching and Research. Makassar, Indonesia: FMIPA UNM Makassar.
Hockly, N. (2011). The digital generation. ELT Journal, 322-325.
Ja’faruddin. (2010). Unconscious Mind Program (hypnoteaching) dalam Pembelajaran Matematika (Unpublished Thesis), Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia.
Ja’faruddin. (2012). Penerapan Unconscious Mind Program (Hypnoteaching) dalam pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Wadah Komunikasi, 5(3), 1-7.
Ja’faruddin. (2014a). Aplikasi Unconscious Mind program Di Universitas. National Seminar, ISBN: 979-604-148-0 (pp. 31-40). Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Ja’faruddin. (2014b). Hypnoteaching as A Teaching Model. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, Technology, Education and Their Application; ISBN:979-604-151-0. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makssar.
Johnson, R. A. (2002). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New Jersey, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Kahija, Y. L. (2007). Hipnoterapi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (2007). Hypnosis. In C. D. Spielberger, Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology (pp. 243-248). Florida, USA: Elsevier Science.
LeFevre, J.-A., Berrigan, L., Vendetti, C., Kamawar, D., Bisanz, J., Skwarchuk, S.-L., & Smith-Chant., B. L. (2013). The role of executive attention in the acquisition of mathematical skills for children in Grades 2 through 4. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114, 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.005
Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: Research lessons and the improvement of Japanese education. American Educator, 22(4), 14-17, 50-52.
Loades, M., Clark, S., & Reynolds, S. (2014). Managing negative thoughts:positive imagery, self-talk, thought stopping and thought acceptance. Retrieved on 31 May 2020 from https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/managing-negative-thoughts-positive-imagery-self-talk-thought-sto
Lytras, M., Gasevic, D., Ordonez de Pablos, P., & Huang, W. (2008). Technology Enhanced Learning: Best Practices. New York: IGI Publishing.
Nurinda, Y. (2008). The secret of Stage Hipnosis Revealed. Retrieved June 13, 2009, from www. Hipnotis.net: www.Hipnotis.net
Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschffell, L. (2002). Framing Student’s Mathematics-Related Beliefs: A Quest for Conceptual Clarity and a Comprehensive Categorization”. In G. Leder, W. Pehkonen, & G. E. Torner, Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education?. (pp. pp.13-37). Netherlands: Springer.
P. Morgan, W., & Stegner, A. J. (2012). Hypnosis in sport: cases, techniques and issues. In The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 681-696). New York, the United States: Oxford University Press.
Pauk, W., & Owens, R. J. (2005). How to Study in College. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Ruslan. (2009). Studi Tentang Kinerja Dosen Berdasarkan Kepuasan Mahasiswa dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Prilaku Pascakuliah di FMIPA Universitas Negeri Makassar (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Makassar, Indonesia: PPS Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Sari, F. D., & Prihatnani, E. (2018). Application Of Hypnoteaching Method To Improve SelfConfidence And Results Of Student Mathematic Learning. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(4), 172-182. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JERE
Smaldino, S., Lowther, D., & Russell, J. (2008). Instructional Technology and Media for Learning (9th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Publications.
Spielberger, C. D. (2004). Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. Florida, USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Steve, B., & Vickers, A. (2004). NLP for Personal Success. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Baca.
Sutton, J., & Kruger, A. (. (2002). ED Thoughts: What We Know About Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Aurora. Aurora, Colorado: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Thirkettle, M., & Pike, G. (2016). Is technology making your attention span shorter than a goldfish’s?. Retrieved from Phys.org website: http://phys.org/news/2015-05-technology-attention-span-shorter-goldfish.html
Zuhri, M., & Sukarnianti. (2015). Using Hypnoteaching Strategy to Improve Students’ Writing Ability. Dinamika Ilmu, 15(2), 185-199. Retrieved from https://journal.iain-samarinda.ac.id/index.php/dinamika_ilmu/article/view/101/199

How to cite this article

APA

Ja’faruddin, Upu, H., Wen-Haw, C., & Teng, D. C.-E. (2020). The Comparison between Two Hypnoteaching Models in Mathematics Teaching and Learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0607. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8480

Vancouver

Ja’faruddin, Upu H, Wen-Haw C, Teng DCE. The Comparison between Two Hypnoteaching Models in Mathematics Teaching and Learning. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3):em0607. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8480

AMA

Ja’faruddin, Upu H, Wen-Haw C, Teng DCE. The Comparison between Two Hypnoteaching Models in Mathematics Teaching and Learning. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3), em0607. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8480

Chicago

Ja’faruddin, Hamzah Upu, Chen Wen-Haw, and Daniel Chia-En Teng. "The Comparison between Two Hypnoteaching Models in Mathematics Teaching and Learning". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 3 (2020): em0607. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8480

Harvard

Ja’faruddin, Upu, H., Wen-Haw, C., and Teng, D. C.-E. (2020). The Comparison between Two Hypnoteaching Models in Mathematics Teaching and Learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0607. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8480

MLA

Ja’faruddin et al. "The Comparison between Two Hypnoteaching Models in Mathematics Teaching and Learning". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 3, 2020, em0607. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8480