International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
Reasoning about Variation: Student Voice
APA
In-text citation: (Reading & Reid, 2007)
Reference: Reading, C., & Reid, J. (2007). Reasoning about Variation: Student Voice. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(3), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/179
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Reading C, Reid J. Reasoning about Variation: Student Voice. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2007;2(3), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/179
Chicago
In-text citation: (Reading and Reid, 2007)
Reference: Reading, Chris, and Jackie Reid. "Reasoning about Variation: Student Voice". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2007 2 no. 3 (2007): 110-127. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/179
Harvard
In-text citation: (Reading and Reid, 2007)
Reference: Reading, C., and Reid, J. (2007). Reasoning about Variation: Student Voice. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(3), pp. 110-127. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/179
MLA
In-text citation: (Reading and Reid, 2007)
Reference: Reading, Chris et al. "Reasoning about Variation: Student Voice". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 2, no. 3, 2007, pp. 110-127. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/179
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Reading C, Reid J. Reasoning about Variation: Student Voice. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2007;2(3):110-27. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/179

Abstract

This paper reports one recent study that was part of a project investigating tertiary students’ understanding of variation. These students completed a questionnaire prior to, and at the end of, an introductory statistics course and this paper focuses on interviews of selected students designed to determine whether more information could have been gathered about the students’ reasoning. Clarification during interviews reinforced researcher interpretation of responses. Prompting assisted students to develop better quality responses but probing was mostly useful for assisting students to re-express reasoning already presented. Cognitive conflict situations proved challenging. The diversity of activities identified by students as assisting the development of their understanding provides a challenge for educators in planning teaching sequences. Both educators and researchers need to listen to students to better understand the development of reasoning. 

References

  • Canada, D. (2006). Elementary pre-service teachers’ conceptions of variation in a probability context. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(1), 36-63. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Garfield, J. (2002). The challenge of developing statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). Online: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/.
  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2005). A framework for teaching and assessing reasoning about variability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 92-99. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Garfield, J., delMas, R., & Chance, B. (in press). Understanding students’ informal notions of variability to develop an understanding of formal measures of variability. In M. Lovett, & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking about Data: 33rd Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
  • Lee, C. (2003) (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Research Forum on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking and Literacy (SRTL3). [CDROM] Mount Pleasant, Michigan: Central Michigan University.
  • Makar, K. (Ed.) (2005). Reasoning about distribution: A collection of studies. Proceedings of the Fourth International Research Forum on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking and Literacy (SRTL-4), University of Auckland, New Zealand. [CDROM] Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
  • Meletiou, M. (2002). Conceptions of variation: A literature review. Statistics Education Research Journal, 1(1), 46–52. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2003). Relationships between students’ experience of learning statistics and teaching statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(1), 39-53. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Pfannkuch, M. (2005). Thinking tools and variation. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 83-91. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Pfannkuch, M., & Brown, C. (1996). Building on and challenging students’ intuitions about probability: Can we improve undergraduate learning? Journal of Statistics Education, 4(1). Online: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/.
  • Pfannkuch, M., & Reading, C. (2006). Reasoning about distribution: A complex process. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 4-9. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Philips, B. (Ed.) (2002). Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics: Developing a Statistically Literate Society, Cape Town, South Africa. [CD-ROM] Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
  • Reading, C. (2002). Variation from a student’s perspective. Statistics Education Research Journal, 1(1), 36. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Reading, C., & Reid, J. (2005). Consideration of variation: A model for curriculum development. In Burrill, G., & Camden, M. (Eds.) Curricular Development in Statistics Education: International Association for Statistical Education 2004 Roundtable (pp. 36-53). Voorburg, the Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
  • Reading, C., & Reid, J. (2006a). Listen to the students: Understanding and supporting students’ reasoning about variation. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Salvador, Brazil. International Statistical Institute and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Reading, C., & Reid, J. (2006b). An emerging hierarchy of reasoning about distribution: from a variation perspective. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 46-68. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Reading, C., & Shaughnessy, C. (2004). Reasoning about variation. In D. Ben-Zvi, & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking, (pp. 201-226). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Reid, J., & Reading, C. (2004). Just a minute? The use of minute papers to investigate statistical thinking in research, teaching and learning, Adults Learning Mathematics Newsletter, 21, 1-4.
  • Reid, J., & Reading, C. (2005). Developing consideration of variation: Case studies from a tertiary introductory service statistics course. In Proceedings of the 55th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Sydney, Australia. [CDROM] Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute.
  • Reid, J., & Reading, C. (2006). A hierarchy of tertiary students’ consideration of variation. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Salvador, Brazil. International Statistical Institute and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Rossman, A. & Chance, B. (Eds.) (2006). Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Salvador, Brazil. International Statistical Institute and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Shaughnessy, M. (2002). Aspects of students’ understandings of variation. Statistics Education Research Journal, 1(1), 37. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, (pp. 957-1009). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Shaughnessy, J. M., Watson, J., Moritz, J., & Reading, C. (1999). School mathematics students’ acknowledgement of statistical variation. In C. Maher (Chair), There’s More to Life than Centers. Presession Research Symposium, 77th Annual National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Conference, San Francisco, CA.
  • Torok, R., & Watson, J. (2000). Development of the concept of statistical variation: An exploratory study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(2), 147-169.
  • Watson, J. (2002). Comparing two data sets: Reasoning and the influence of cognitive conflict. Statistics Education Research Journal, 1(1), 37. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Watson, J., & Callingham, R. (2003). Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3-46. Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase.
  • Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2004a). Statistical variation in a chance setting: A two-year study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 121-144.
  • Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2004b). Expectation versus variation: Students’ decision making in a chance environment. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4, 371-396.
  • Watson, J., Kelly, B., Callingham, R., & Shaughnessy, M. (2003). The measurement of school students’ understanding of statistical variation. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 34(1), 1-29.
  • Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223-265.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.