International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Açıkgül, K., & Aslaner, R. (2020). Effects of Geogebra supported micro teaching applications and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) game practices on the TPACK levels of prospective teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 2023-2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10044-y
• Addico, A., Ali, C., & Adzifome, N. (2022). Student-teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge preparedness for mathematics instruction. Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v2i2.116
• Badillo, E., González, M., & Moreno, M. (2022). Una mirada crítica al MTSK. In J. Carrillo Yáñez, M. Á. Montes Navarro, & N. Climent Rodríguez (Eds.), Investigación sobre conocimiento especializado del profesor de matemáticas (MTSK): 10 años de camino [A critical look at MTSK. Research on mathematics teacher specialized knowledge (MTSK): 10 years of progress] (pp. 207-222). Dykinson.
• Bonett, D. (2002). Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavior Statistic, 27(4), 335-340. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986027004335
• Bretscher, N. (2023). Conceptualising TPACK within mathematics education: Teachers’ strategies for capitalising on transitions within and beyond dynamic geometry software. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 9, 232-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00115-0
• Carrillo, J., Climent, N., Montes. M.A., Contreras, L., Flores-Medrano, E., Escudero-Ávila, D., Vasco, D., Rojas, N., Flores, P., Aguilar, A., Ribeiro, M., & Muñoz, M. (2018). The mathematics teacher's specialized knowledge (MTSK) model. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1479981
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
• Dilling, F., Scheneider, R., Weigand, H., & Witzke, I. (2024). Describing the digital competencies of mathematics teachers: Theoretical and empirical considerations on the importance of experience and reflection. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 56, 639-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01560-4
• Engin, R., Karakus, D., & Niess, M. (2023). TPACK development model for pre‑service mathematics teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 4769-4794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11381-1
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
• Gamboa, G. (2022). Conocimientos tecnológicos pedagógicos de contenido matemático [Technological pedagogical knowledge of mathematical content]. Universidad Internacional de Andalucia – Universidad de Huelva.
• Guzmán-González, J., & Vesga-Bravo, G. (2024). TPACK in in-service secondary education teachers: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 12(1), 282-296. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3198
• Handal, B., Campbell, C., Cavanagh, M., Petocz, P., & Kelly, N. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 22-40.
• Kidron, I., & Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2015). Advancing research by means of the networking of theories. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative methods in mathematics education – Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 221-232). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_9
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
• Kurt, G., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2023). Prospective mathematics teachers’ TPACK development in graphical data displays: A microteaching lesson study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(3), 445-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2246970
• Lawshe, C. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
• Li, M., Qawi-Noori, A., & Li, Y. (2023). Development and validation of the secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK scale: A study in the Chinese context. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), Article em2350. http://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13671
• Mailizar, M., & Fan, L. (2020). Indonesian teachers’ knowledge of ICT and the use of ICT in secondary mathematics teaching. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), Article em1799. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110352
• McLaughlin-Galanti, T., Baker, C., Morrow, K., & Kraft, T. (2021). Enriching TPACK in mathematics education: using digital interactive notebooks in synchronous online learning environments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0175
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
• Morales-López, Y., Chacón-Camacho, Y., & Vargas-Delgado, W. (2021). TPACK of prospective mathematics teachers at an early stage of training. Mathematics, 9(15), Article 1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151741
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Njiku, J. (2024). Assessing the development of mathematics teachers TPACK through an observation rubric. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 2043-2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11901-7
• Ochkov, V. F., & Bogomolova, E. P. (2015). Teaching mathematics with mathematical software. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 5(1), 265-285. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201501.15
• Pocan, S., Altay, B., & Yasaroglu, C. (2023). The effects of mobile technology on learning performance and motivation in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 683-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11166-6
• Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
• Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: first steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0086-z
• Putri, S., Abdurahman, A., Andrian, D., Angraini, L., & Effendi, L. (2022). Development of interactive multimedia-based mathematics learning media macromedia flash 8. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 5(2), 206-213. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i2.133
• Rocha, H. (2023). Models on teachers’ knowledge to teach with digital technology: A systematic review. In Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13). Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics.
• Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., Burón, D., Aguilar-González, Á., & Muñiz-Rodríguez, L. (2021). Secondary mathematics teachers’ perception of their readiness for emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Education Sciences, 11(5), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050228
• Rodríguez-Nieto, C., Font, V., & Rodríguez-Vasquez, F. (2022). Literature review on networking of theories developed in mathematics education context. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(11), Article em2179. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12513
• Silva-Gumiero, B., & Pazuch, V. (2024). Digital technologies and mathematics teaching: An analysis of teacher professional knowledge. Pedagogical Research, 9(2), Article em0200. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14342
• Smith, P., & Zelkowski, J. (2023). Validating a TPACK instrument for 7–12 mathematics in-service middle and high school teachers in the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(5), 858-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2048145
• Tekeher-Getenet, S., Beswick, K., & Callingham, R. (2015). Conceptualizing technology integrated mathematics teaching: The stamp knowledge framework. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 39), 2, 321-328.
• Van Leendert, A., Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Pel, J., & Van Der Steen, J. (2021). Teachers’ skills and knowledge in mathematics education for braille readers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1171-1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09525-2
• Vàsconez-Paredes, C., & Inga-Ortega, E. (2021). El modelo de aprendizaje TPACK y su impacto en la innovación educativa desde un análisis bibliométrico [The TPACK learning model and its impact on educational innovation from a bibliometric analysis]. Innova Research Journal, 6(3), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v6.n3.2021.1773
• Willermark, S. (2018). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A review of empirical studies published from 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114
• Zambak, V., & Tyminski, A. (2020). Examining mathematical technological knowledge of pre-service middle grades teachers with geometer´s sketchpad in a geometry course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1650302

APA

Padilla-Escorcia, I. A., García-Rodríguez, M. L., & Aguilar-González, Á. (2025). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge in the use of digital technologies for teaching: Insights from the TPCSK instrument. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(4), em0851. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16836

Vancouver

Padilla-Escorcia IA, García-Rodríguez ML, Aguilar-González Á. Mathematics teachers’ knowledge in the use of digital technologies for teaching: Insights from the TPCSK instrument. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(4):em0851. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16836

AMA

Padilla-Escorcia IA, García-Rodríguez ML, Aguilar-González Á. Mathematics teachers’ knowledge in the use of digital technologies for teaching: Insights from the TPCSK instrument. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(4), em0851. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16836

Chicago

Padilla-Escorcia, Iván Andrés, Martha Leticia García-Rodríguez, and Álvaro Aguilar-González. "Mathematics teachers’ knowledge in the use of digital technologies for teaching: Insights from the TPCSK instrument". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2025 20 no. 4 (2025): em0851. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16836

Harvard

Padilla-Escorcia, I. A., García-Rodríguez, M. L., and Aguilar-González, Á. (2025). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge in the use of digital technologies for teaching: Insights from the TPCSK instrument. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(4), em0851. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16836

MLA

Padilla-Escorcia, Iván Andrés et al. "Mathematics teachers’ knowledge in the use of digital technologies for teaching: Insights from the TPCSK instrument". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 4, 2025, em0851. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16836