International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
Exploring Teachers’ Experiences on the Nature of Mathematics based on their Curricular and Pedagogical Practices: A Phenomenological Inquiry
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Luitel L. Exploring Teachers’ Experiences on the Nature of Mathematics based on their Curricular and Pedagogical Practices: A Phenomenological Inquiry. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3), em0613. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9135
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Luitel, 2020)
Reference: Luitel, L. (2020). Exploring Teachers’ Experiences on the Nature of Mathematics based on their Curricular and Pedagogical Practices: A Phenomenological Inquiry. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0613. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9135
Chicago
In-text citation: (Luitel, 2020)
Reference: Luitel, Laxman. "Exploring Teachers’ Experiences on the Nature of Mathematics based on their Curricular and Pedagogical Practices: A Phenomenological Inquiry". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 3 (2020): em0613. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9135
Harvard
In-text citation: (Luitel, 2020)
Reference: Luitel, L. (2020). Exploring Teachers’ Experiences on the Nature of Mathematics based on their Curricular and Pedagogical Practices: A Phenomenological Inquiry. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0613. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9135
MLA
In-text citation: (Luitel, 2020)
Reference: Luitel, Laxman "Exploring Teachers’ Experiences on the Nature of Mathematics based on their Curricular and Pedagogical Practices: A Phenomenological Inquiry". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 3, 2020, em0613. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9135
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Luitel L. Exploring Teachers’ Experiences on the Nature of Mathematics based on their Curricular and Pedagogical Practices: A Phenomenological Inquiry. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3):em0613. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/9135

Abstract

The school mathematics curriculum development process in Nepal is still conventional. Contextualized mathematics teaching and learning has not been the priority of school education of Nepal. Majority of the school mathematics teachers in Nepal still conceptualize the mathematics and mathematics curriculum from the conformist approach. Thus, this paper aims to explore mathematics teachers’ experiences on the nature of mathematics focusing on their curricular and pedagogical practices based on the research question how mathematics teachers experience the nature of mathematical knowledge during their curricular and pedagogical practices. Ernest’s and Luitel’s nature of mathematical knowledge has enabled me to evaluate teachers’ experiences towards the nature of mathematical knowledge and Habermas’s theory of knowledge constitutive interest has guided the research for knowledge and implied others’ concept. The study has relied on the phenomenological approach and reflected the experiences of four mathematics teachers. The paper concludes that mathematics curriculum guided by emancipatory interest as well as practical interest promotes counter-hegemonic vision of teaching and learning mathematics and might develop critical consciousness. Critical consciousness embedded mathematics curriculum helps students and teachers to unpack the cultural nature of mathematics education and taken-for-granted assumptions about teaching and learning through critical pedagogy.

References

  • Dossey, J. (1992). The nature of mathematics: Its role and its influence. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 39-48). New York: Macmillan.
  • Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Routledge.
  • Ernest, P. (1994). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In A. Bloomfeild, & T. Harries (Eds.), Teaching and learning in mathematics. Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Fraser, S. P., & Bosanquet, A. M. (2006). The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Studies in Higher Education, 31(03), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680521
  • Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (revised). New York: Continuum.
  • Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or Praxis? London: Falmer.
  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests (2nd Ed.) London: Heinemann.
  • Hua, (2015). On teacher development. In W. Pinar & Z. Hua (Eds.), Autobiography and teacher development in China: Subjectivity and culture in curriculum reform. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1049748
  • Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and method. Pearson Education.
  • Lerman, S. (1990). Alternative perspectives of the nature of mathematics and their influence on the teaching of mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192900160105
  • Lloyd, G. (2002). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and experiences with innovative curriculum materials. In Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 149-159). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_9
  • Luitel, B. C. (2013). Mathematics as an im/pure knowledge system: Symbiosis, (w)holism and synergy in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9366-8
  • Luitel, B. C. (2018). A mindful inquiry towards transformative curriculum vision for inclusive mathematics education. Learning: Research and Practice, 4(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2018.1428141
  • Luitel, B. C., & Taylor, P. C. (2005, Apr). Overcoming culturally dislocated curricula in a transitional society: An autoethnographic journey towards pragmatic wisdom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA).
  • Luitel, B. C., & Taylor, P. C. (2007). The shanai, the pseudosphere and other imaginings: Envisioning culturally contextualised mathematics education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(3), 621-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9068-7
  • Luitel, B. C., & Taylor, P. C. (2008) Globalization, ecological consciousness and curriculum as montage: A vision for culturally contextualized mathematics education. In: 16th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (SAARMSTE) 2008, 14-18 January 2008, Maseru, Lesotho.
  • Luitel, L., & Pant, B. P. (2019). Images of mathematics curriculum held by mathematics teachers: mapping the road for transformative pedagogy. In Y. Rahmawati & P. C. Taylor (Eds.), Empowering Science and Mathematics for Global Competitiveness: Proceedings of the Science and Mathematics International Conference (SMIC 2018), November 2-4, 2018, Jakarta, Indonesia. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429461903-69
  • Macintyre, T., & Hamilton, S. (2010). Mathematics learners and mathematics textbooks: a question of identity? Whose curriculum? Whose mathematics? The Curriculum Journal, 21(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170903558224
  • Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515959100300116
  • Ndlovu, W., Pournara, C., & Mwakapenda, W. (2019). Changes in learners’ perspectives on the nature of mathematics after participating in a mentorship programme. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(1), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1601930
  • Paley, J. (2017). Phenomenology as qualitative research: A critical analysis of meaning attribution. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623979
  • Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Routledge.
  • Presmeg, N. (2003). Beliefs about the nature of mathematics in the bridging of everyday and school mathematical practices. In Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 293-312). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_17
  • Spangenberg, E. D., & Myburgh, C. (2017). Comparing South African Female and Male Pre-Service Teachers’ Beliefs about the Nature of Mathematics. Africa Education Review, 14(2), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1292828
  • Trigwell, K. (2000) Phenomenography: discernment and variation. Improving Student Learning, 7, 75-85.
  • Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
  • Wagle, S. K., Luitel, B. C., & Krogh, E. (2019). Irrelevance of Basic School Education in Nepal: An Anti-Colonial Critique on Problems and Prospects. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 13, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v13i0.24032

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.