Danish Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical and Didactical Knowledge of Operations with Rational Numbers

Zetra Hainul Putra

doi:10.29333/iejme/5775

Full Text (PDF)

Zetra Hainul Putra ¹ ² ^*

More Detail

¹ Department of Science Education, University of Copenhagen, DENMARK² Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Riau, INDONESIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate Danish pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) mathematical and didactical knowledge of operations with rational numbers. This knowledge is studied through their collaborative activities to certain tasks related to the teaching of operations with rational numbers. An explicit model of the teachers’ mathematical and didactical knowledge is designed based on the anthropological theory of the didactic (ATD) and used to analyse five-groups of PSTs’ collaborative work. The findings show that the Danish PSTs prefer to use contextual or real-life situations in their teaching, but they encounter various challenges to realise general ideas in the context at hand.

Keywords

operations with rational numbers
mathematical and didactical knowledge
anthropological theory of the didactic
collaborative work

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, 2019, Volume 14, Issue 3, 619-632

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5775

Publication date: 14 May 2019

Article Views: 1819

Article Downloads: 1084

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Alenazi, A. (2016). Examining middle school pre-service teachers’ knowledge of fraction division interpretations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(5), 696-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1083127
An, S., Kulm, G., & Wu, Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, mathematics teachers in China and the US. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 145-172. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jmte.0000021943.35739.1c
Austin, P., Carbone, R. E., & Webb, P. (2011). Prospective primary school Teachers’ attempts to pose acceptable word problems on the addition of fractions: Some insights from South Africa and the United States of America. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2011.10740710
Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The elementary school journal, 90(4), 449-466. https://doi.org/10.1086/461626
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Bosch, M. & Gascón, J. (2014). Introduction to the anthropological theory of the didactic (ATD). In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs & S. Prediger (Eds.), Networking of Theories as a Research Practice in Mathematics Education (pp. 67-83). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05389-9_5
Bradshaw, L., Izsák, A., Templin, J., & Jacobson, E. (2014). Diagnosing teachers’ understandings of rational numbers: Building a multidimensional test within the diagnostic classification framework. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(1), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12020
Castro-Rodríguez, E., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Rico, L., & Gómez, P. (2016). Prospective teachers’ understanding of the multiplicative part-whole relationship of fraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9673-4
Charalambous, C. Y., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2007). Drawing on a theoretical model to study students’ understandings of fractions. Educational studies in mathematics, 64(3), 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9036-2
Chevallard, Y. (1992). Fundamental concepts in didactics: perspectives provided by an anthropological approach. In R. Douady & A. Mercier (Eds.), Research in Didactique of Mathematics (pp. 131-167). Grenoble: La Pensée sauvage.
Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In M. Bosch (Eds.), Proceedings of the IV Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 21-30). Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
Chevallard, Y. (2007). Readjusting didactics to a changing epistemology. European Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 131 – 134. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.2.131
Danish Ministry of Education. (2011). Moderne matematiske færdigheder fra skolestart til studiestart [Modern mathematics skills from school start to study start]. Retrieved from http://www2.mat.dtu.dk/people/S.Markvorsen/DISPLAY/ABOUT_MATH1_PROOPG/Faerdigrapport_Dec_16.pdf
Depaepe, F., Torbeyns, J., Vermeersch, N., Janssens, D., Janssen, R., Kelchtermans, G., ... & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge on rational numbers: A comparison of prospective elementary and lower secondary school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.009
Dixon, J. K., Andreasen, J. B., Avila, C. L., Bawatneh, Z., Deichert, D. L., Howse, T. D., & Turner, M. S. (2014). Redefining the whole: Common errors in elementary preservice teachers’ self-authored word problems for fraction subtraction. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790336
Durand-Guerrier, V., Winsløw, C. & Yoshida, H. (2010). A model of mathematics teacher knowledge and a comparative study in Denmark, France and Japan. Annales de didactique et des sciences cognitives, 15, 147-172.
Erdem, E., Gökkurt, B., Şahin, Ö., Başıbüyük, K., & Soylu, Y. (2015). Examining prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ modelling skills of multiplication and division in fractions. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(1), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v17i1.830
Francisco, J. M. (2013). Learning in collaborative settings: Students building on each other’s ideas to promote their mathematical understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 417-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9437-3
Freil, O, & Kaas, T. (2006). Kolorit matematik for sjette klasse-grundbog [Kolorit mathematics for the sixth grade-basics]. København: Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag A/S.
Freil, O, & Kaas, T. (2007). Kolorit matematik for femte klasse-grundbog (2. Oplag) [Kolorit mathematics for the fifth grade-basics 2^nd edition]. København: Gyldendalske Boghandel, Nordisk Forlag A/S.
Gabriel, F. C., Coché, F., Szucs, D., Carette, V., Rey, B., & Content, A. (2013). A componential view of children’s difficulties in learning fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 715. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00715
Jacobson, E., & Izsák, A. (2015). Knowledge and motivation as mediators in mathematics teaching practice: the case of drawn models for fraction arithmetic. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(5), 467-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9320-0
Kar, T., & Isik, C. (2014). Analysis of problems posed by pre-service primary teachers about adding fractions in terms of semantic structures. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 135-146.
Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x
Lamon, S. J. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (3rd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803165
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United State. New Jersey: LEA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602589
Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of pre-service elementary teachers: Knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1080 – 1110. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208320851
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of research in science teaching, 2(3), 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
Putra, Z. H. (2016). Pengetahuan mahasiswa pendidikan guru sekolah dasar dalam merepresentasikan operasi pecahan dengan model persegi panjang [Pre-service elementary teachers’ knowledge on representing the fraction operations with rectangle models]. Jurnal Elemen 2(1): 1 – 13. Jurnal Elemen. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v2i1.174
Putra, Z. H. (2018). A comparative study of Danish and Indonesian pre-service teachers’ knowledge of rational numbers (PhD thesis). University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Putra, Z. H. (2019). Elementary teachers’ knowledge on fraction multiplication: An anthropological theory of the didactic approach. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education,2(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.33578/jtlee.v2i1.6964
Putra, Z. H., & Winsløw, C. (2018). Teachers’ collective knowledge: the case of equivalent fractions. In R. Johar et al. (Eds.), Proceeding of the 6^th South East Asia Design Research International Conference (6^th SEA-DR IC) (vol. 1088, pp. 1-6), Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012003
Putra, Z. H., & Winsløw, C. (2019). Prospective teachers’ knowledge of comparing decimals. International on Emerging Mathematics Education, 3(1), 57-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i1.11314
Rodríguez, E., Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2008). A networking method to compare theories: metacognition in problem solving reformulated within the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic. ZDM, 40(2), 287-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0094-z
Şahin, Ö., Gökkurt, B., & Soylu, Y. (2016). Examining prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge on fractions in terms of students’ mistakes. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 531-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2015.1092178
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004
Siegler, R. S., & Lortie-Forgues, H. (2017). Hard Lessons: Why Rational Number Arithmetic Is So Difficult for So Many People. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 346-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417700129
Slattery, J., & Fitzmaurice, O. (2014). ‘Ours is not to reason why, just invert and multiply’: an insight into Irish prospective secondary teachers’ conceptual understanding of the division of fractions. Irish Educational Studies, 33(4), 467-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2014.982346
Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarso, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher education and development study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/749817
Vamvakoussi, X., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). Naturally biased? In search for reaction time evidence for a natural number bias in adults. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 31(3), 344-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.02.001
Van Dooren, W., Lehtinen, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2015). Unraveling the gap between natural and rational numbers. Learning and Instruction, 37, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.01.001
Van Steenbrugge, H., Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2014). Preservice elementary school teachers’ knowledge of fractions: a mirror of students’ knowledge? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 138-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.839003
Winsløw, C., Barquero, B., De Vleeshower, M., & Hardy, N. (2015). An institutional approach to university mathematics education: from dual vector spaces to questioning the world. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918345
Winsløw, C., & Durand-Guerrier, V. (2007). Education of lower secondary mathematics teachers in Denmark and France, Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education 12(2), 5-32.

How to cite this article

APA

Putra, Z. H. (2019). Danish Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical and Didactical Knowledge of Operations with Rational Numbers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 619-632. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5775

Vancouver

Putra ZH. Danish Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical and Didactical Knowledge of Operations with Rational Numbers. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2019;14(3):619-32. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5775

AMA

Putra ZH. Danish Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical and Didactical Knowledge of Operations with Rational Numbers. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2019;14(3), 619-632. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5775

Chicago

Putra, Zetra Hainul. "Danish Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical and Didactical Knowledge of Operations with Rational Numbers". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2019 14 no. 3 (2019): 619-632. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5775

Harvard

Putra, Z. H. (2019). Danish Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical and Didactical Knowledge of Operations with Rational Numbers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), pp. 619-632. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5775

MLA

Putra, Zetra Hainul "Danish Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical and Didactical Knowledge of Operations with Rational Numbers". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 14, no. 3, 2019, pp. 619-632. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5775