This paper reports on a semester-long co-teaching investigation in which three mathematics teacher educators in the USA themselves enacted a co-plan/co-teach credentialing model in the context of a mathematics content course for future elementary teachers. The mathematics teacher educators sought to examine the co-planning practices for improving the team teaching co-teaching strategy. Data were collected from the mathematics teacher educators over fifteen weeks, including twice-weekly journal entries and classroom observation protocols. Utilizing a first-person research study design, the mathematics teacher educators found that a co-planning strategy could be used to maximize resources and improve lesson cohesion during team taught lessons. In particular, the mathematics teacher educators used co-planning meetings to divide lesson responsibilities by learning goal or by task. In this novel approach to mathematics teacher educator training, we describe the co-planning strategy along with its expansion, implementation, benefits, and limitations, and argue for its use in co-teachers’ co-planning repertoire.

• Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2017). Standards for Preparing Teachers of Mathematics. amte.net/standards
• Bacharach, N., & Heck, T. W. (2007). Co-teaching in higher education. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 4(10), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v4i10.1532
• Bacharach, N., Heck, T. W., & Dahlberg, K. (2010). Changing the face of student teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 32(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2010.10463538
• Ball, D. L. (2000). Working on the inside: Using one’s own practice as a site for studying teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Birrell, J. R., & Bullough Jr, R. V. (2005). Teaching with a peer: A follow-up study of the 1st year of teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 27(1), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2005.10463375
• Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.17161/fec.v28i3.6852
• Druken, B. K., & Marzocchi, A. S. (under review). Co-teaching strategies in action: Selection and implementation in a mathematics content course.
• Druken, B. K., Marzocchi, A. S., & Brye, M. V. (2020). Facilitating collaboration between mathematics methods and content faculty through cross-departmental lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 10(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-06-2020-0033
• Duran, D., Corcelles, M., Flores, M., & Miquel, E. (2019). Changes in attitudes and willingness to use co-teaching through pre-service teacher training experiences. Professional Development in Education, 46(5), 770-779. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1634631
• Dynak, J., Whitten, E., & Dynak, D. (1997). Refining the general education student teaching experience through the use of special education collaborative teaching models. Action in Teacher Education, 19(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1997.10462855
• Ferguson, J., & Wilson, J. C. (2011). The co-teaching professorship: Power and expertise in the co-taught higher education classroom. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 5(1), 52-68.
• Friend, M., Embury, D. C., & Clarke, L. (2015). Co-teaching versus apprentice teaching: An analysis of similarities and differences. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(2), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414529308
• Gallo-Fox, J., & Scantlebury, K. (2016). Coteaching as professional development for cooperating teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.007
• Gleason, J., Livers, S. D., & Zelkowski, J. (2015). Mathematics classroom observation protocol for practices: Descriptors manual. http://jgleason.people.ua.edu/mcop2.html
• Graziano, K. J., & Navarrete, L. A. (2012). Co-teaching in a teacher education classroom: Collaboration, compromise, and creativity. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 109-126.
• Hartigan, B. F. (2014). Early childhood teacher preparation: Using the co-teaching model. Creative Education, 5(8), 641-645. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.58076
• Hatch, A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press.
• Hiesh, B., & Nguyen, H. (2015). Co-teaching, co-leading, co-learning: Reflection on the co-teaching model in practicum. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(14), 1-9.
• Hoppey, D., Yendol-Silva, D., & Pullen, P. (2004). We became teachers together: Understanding collaborative teaching as innovation in unified teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 26(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2004.10463309
• Kamen, M., Junk, D. L., Marble, S., Cooper, S., Eddy, C. M., Wilkerson, T. L., & Sawyer, C. (2011). Walking the talk: Lessons learned by university mathematics methods instructors implementing lesson study for their own professional development. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 165-174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9941-9_13
• Krulik, S., Rudnick, J. A., & Milou, E. (2003). Teaching mathematics in middle school: A practical guide. Allyn and Bacon.
• Murphy, C., & Scantlebury, K. (2010). Coteaching in international contexts: Research and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3707-7
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
• Pearl, C., Dieker, L. A., & Kirkpatrick, R. M. (2012). A five-year retrospective on the Arkansas department of education co-teaching project. Professional Development in Education, 38(4), 571-587. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.668858
• Pratt, S. M., Imbody, S. M., Wolf, L. D., & Patterson, A. L. (2017). Co-planning in co-teaching: A practical solution. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(4), 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216659474
• Reinhart, S. C. (2000). Never say anything a kid can say! Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(8), 478-483. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.5.8.0478
• Rexroat‐Frazier, N., & Chamberlin, S. (2019). Best practices in co‐teaching mathematics with special needs students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(3), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12439
• Roth, W., Tobin, K., & Zimmermann, A. (2002). Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: an activity-theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 253-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10018
• Rytivaara, A., & Kershner, R. (2012). Co-teaching as a context for teachers’ professional learning and joint knowledge construction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 999-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.006
• Scantlebury, K., Gallo-Fox, J., & Wassell, B. (2008). Coteaching as a model for preservice secondary science teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 967-981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.10.008
• Thousand, J. S., Villa, R. A., & Nevin, A. I. (2006). The many faces of collaborative planning and teaching. Theory into Practice, 45(3), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4503_6
• Titan EDUCATOR. (n.d.). The focused visit observation form (Unpublished internal document), College of Education, California State University, Fullerton.
• Titan EDUCATOR. (n.d.). The POP cycle observation form (Unpublished internal document), College of Education, California State University, Fullerton.
• Yopp, R. H., Ellis, M. W., Bonsangue, M. V., Duarte, T., & Meza, S. (2014). Piloting a co-teaching model for mathematics teacher preparation: Learning to teach together. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(1), 91-111.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.