International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215-241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077
• Azevedo, B. F., Pereira, A. I., Fernandes, F. P., & Pacheco, M. F. (2022). Mathematics learning and assessment using MathE platform: A case study. Educational and Information Technologies, 27, 1747-1769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10669-y
• Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 381-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1273-8
• Baker, T., Smith, L., & Anissa, N. (2019). Educ-AI-tion rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. Nesta.
• Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: Introduction and review. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 47, 1047-1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0738-8
• Basyal, D., Jones, D. L., & Thapa, M. (2023). Cognitive demand of mathematics tasks in Nepali middle school mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(3), 863-879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10269-3
• Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational researcher, 13(6), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
• Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2010). The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9242-9
• Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044160
• Cagiltay, K. (2006). Scaffolding strategies in electronic performance support systems: Types and challenges. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500467673
• Chatti, M. A., Muslim, A., Guesmi, M., Richtscheid, F., Nasimi, D., Shahin, A., & Damera, R. (2020). How to design effective learning analytics indicators? A human-centered design approach. In Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education: 15th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 303-317). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_22
• Chen, C. H., & Su, C. Y. (2019). Using the BookRoll e-book system to promote self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and academic achievement for university students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(4), 33-46.
• Cho, M. K., & Kim, M. K. (2020). Investigating elementary students’ problem solving and teacher scaffolding in solving an ill-structured problem. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(4), 274-289.
• Choi, J. (2017). Characteristics that appear in the problem solving process of the classification task of function related to high school students' mathematical learning style. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(6), 313-334. http://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.6.313
• Dani, A. (2016). Students' patterns of interaction with a mathematics intelligent tutor: Learning analytics application. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2016.5201
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
• del Olmo-Muñoz, J., González-Calero, J. A., Diago, P. D., Arnau, D., & Arevalillo-Herráez, M. (2023). Intelligent tutoring systems for word problem solving in COVID-19 days: Could they have been (part of) the solution? ZDM–Mathematics Education, 55(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01396-w
• Duffy, M. C., & Azevedo, R. (2015). Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.041
• Florida Center for Instructional Technology (2019). The Technology Integration Matrix. Retrieved July 5, 2025, from https://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix/
• Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational technology research and development, 51(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515
• Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational technology research and development, 52(2), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504836
• Goldin, G., & Nina, S. (2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical concepts. In A. A. Cuoco, & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The Role of Representation in School Mathematics: 2001 Yearbook (pp. 1-23). NCTM.
• Greene, B. A., & Land, S. M. (2000). A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the world wide web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(2), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.2190/1GUB-8UE9-NW80-CQAD
• Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching & learning. Globethics Publications.
• Jackson, S. L., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 187-194). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274672
• Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169
• Jung, H. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2020). 2015 suhaggwa gyoyuggwajeong gaejeong jeonhu gyogwaseo gwaje-ui injijeog nolyeog sujun-ui byeonhwa [Changes in the levels of cognitive demand in textbook tasks before and after 2015 revision of mathematics curriculum: Focused on the function for 7th grade]. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(7), 833-856. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.7.833
• Karadimce, A., & Davcev, D. (2013). Adaptive multimedia delivery in m-learning systems using profiling. In V. Trajkovik, & M. Anastas (Eds.), ICT Innovations 2013. Advances in Intelligent Systeems and Computing (Vol. 231, pp. 57-65). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01466-1_5
• Khan Academy (n.d.-a). Meet Khanmigo—A better way to learn with AI. Khanmigo. Retrieved July 5, 2025, from https://blog.khanacademy.org/khanmigo-lite/
• Khan Academy. (n.d.-b). Khan Academy. Retrieved July 5, 2025, from https://www.khanacademy.org/
• Kim, S. (2023). An analysis of domestic and international research trends on AI-based personalized learning through TF-IDF and topic modeling. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 27(4), 453-464. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2023.27.4.453
• Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024
• Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42-78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420
• Lee, C.-Y., Chen, M.-J., & Chang, W.-L. (2014). Effects of the multiple solutions and question prompts on generalization and justification for non-routine mathematical problem solving in a computer game context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1022a
• Lee, M. H., & Cho, M. K. (2023). Exploring directions for elementary mathematics teaching and learning to support spatial sense. School Mathematics, 25(2), 277-305. School Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.57090/sm.2023.06.25.2.277
• Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal learning environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 152-164). https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425763.010
• Ministry of Education (2023). Digital-driven education reform plan announced: Unlocking opportunities for personalized learning in education. Retrieved July 5, 2025, from https://english.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenewal.do?boardID=265&boardSeq=94073&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=2&s=english&m=0201&opType=N
• Molenaar, I., Horvers, A., & Dijkstra, R. (2019). Young learners’ regulation of practice behavior in adaptive learning technologies. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02792
• Montebello, M. (2018). AI injected e-learning. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67928-0
• Moreno-Armella, L., Hegedus, S. J., & Kaput, J. J. (2008). From static to dynamic mathematics: Historical and representational perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9116-6
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM] (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston.
• Papadimitriou, A., & Gyftodimos, G. (2007). Use of Kolb’s learning cycle through an adaptive educational hypermedia system for a constructivist approach of electromagnetism. Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Engineering Education (pp. 226-231).
• Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4002_6
• Park, M. (2020). The trends of using artificial intelligence in mathematics education. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31(Supplement), 91-102.
• Park, M., Lim, H., Kim, J., Lee, K., & Kim, M. (2020). The effects on the personalized learning platform with machine learning recommendation modules: Focused on learning time, self-directed learning ability, attitudes toward mathematics, and mathematics achievement. The Mathematical Education, 59(4), 373-387. http://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2020.59.4.373
• Pepin, B., Xu, B., Trouche, L., & Wang, C. (2016). Developing a deeper understanding of mathematics teaching expertise: An examination of three Chinese mathematics teachers’ resource systems as windows into their work and expertise. Educational Studies in mathematics, 94(3), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9727-2
• Phillips, A., Pane, J. F., Reumann-Moore, R., & Shenbanjo, O. (2020). Implementing an adaptive intelligent tutoring system as an instructional supplement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1409-1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09745-w
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
• Remillard, J. T., Harris, B., & Agodini, R. (2014). The influence of curriculum material design on opportunities for student learning. ZDM, 46(5), 735-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-014-0585-Z
• Şahin, S., & Uluyol, Ç. (2016). Preservice teachers’ perception and use of personal learning environments (PLEs). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2284
• Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505026
• Schukajlow, S., Kolter, J., & Blum, W. (2015). Scaffolding mathematical modelling with a solution plan. ZDM, 47, 1241-1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0707-2
• Shariffudin, R. S., Julia-Guan, C. H., Dayang, T., Mislan, N., & Lee, M. F. (2012). Mobile learning environments for diverse learners in higher education. International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, 1(1), 32-35. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJFCC.2012.V1.10
• Shin, D. (2020). cho·jungdeung-gyoyug-eseo ingongjineung: chegyejeog munheongochal [Artificial intelligence in primary and secondary education: A systemic review]. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 30(3), 531-552. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.08.30.3.531
• Shum, B. S., Ferguson, R., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2019). Human-centred learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.1
• Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. Pearson College Div.
• Smart Nation Singapore (2019). National artificial intelligence strategy: Advancing our smart nation journey. Singapore Government. Retrieved July 5, 2025, from https://www.smartnation.gov.sg/files/publications/national-ai-strategy.pdf
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K–12 students’ mathematical learning. Journal of educational psychology, 105(4), 970-987. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032447
• Stein, M. K., & Kim, G. (2009). The role of mathematics curriculum materials in largescale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 37-55). Routledge.
• Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3.4.0268
• Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
• Sung, J. (2023). Analysis of functions and applications of intelligent tutoring system for personalized adaptive learning in mathematics. The Mathematical Education, 62(3), 303-326. https://doi.org/10.63311/mathedu.2023.62.3.303
• Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics education, 43(3), 253-295. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0253 Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
• U.S. Department of Education's Office of Educational Technology (2023). Artificial intelligence and future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. Retrieved July 5, 2025, from https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf
• Usiskin, Z. (2018). Electronic vs. paper textbook presentations of the various aspects of mathematics. ZDM, 50, 849-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0936-2
• Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M, S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1161-1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
• Van de Pol, J., & Elbers, E. (2013). Scaffolding student learning: A micro-analysis of teacher–student interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.12.001
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational psychology review, 22, 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
• Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. (2014). Advanced technologies for personalized learning, instruction, and performance. In M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 425-437). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_34
• Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., & Klerkx, J. (2014). Learning dashboards: An overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1499-1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0751-2
• Walkington, C. A. (2013). Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 932-945. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031882
• Watters, A. (2023). Teaching machines: The history of personalized learning. MIT Press.
• Webb, D. C., Boswinkel, N., & Dekker, T. (2008). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Using representations to support student understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(2), 110-113. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.14.2.0110
• Whittington, M. S., & Raven, M. R. (1995). Learning and teaching styles of student teachers in the northwest. Journal of Agricultural Education, 36(4), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1995.04010
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
• Wu, R., Xu, G., Chen, E., Liu, Q., & Ng, W. (2017). Knowledge or gaming? Cognitive modelling based on multiple-attempt response. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (pp. 321-329). https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054156
• Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2019). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education, 140, Article 103599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599
• Yim, Y., Ahn, S., Kim, K., Kim, J. H., & Hong, O. (2021). ingongjineung-eul hwal-yonghan sueob jiwonsiseutem-ui hyogwaseong bunseog : <ttogttog suhagtamheomdae> salyeleul jungsim-eulo [The effects of AI-based class support system on student learning: Focusing on the case of Toctoc Math Expedition in Korea]. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 32(4), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.20972/Kjee.32.4.202112.61
• Zhang, B., & Jia, J. (2017). Evaluating an intelligent tutoring system for personalized math teaching. In 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 126-130). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2017.37

APA

Cho, M. K., & Kim, S. (2025). Analyzing AI-based educational platforms for supporting personalized mathematics learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(4), em0847. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16664

Vancouver

Cho MK, Kim S. Analyzing AI-based educational platforms for supporting personalized mathematics learning. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(4):em0847. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16664

AMA

Cho MK, Kim S. Analyzing AI-based educational platforms for supporting personalized mathematics learning. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2025;20(4), em0847. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16664

Chicago

Cho, Mi Kyung, and Seyoung Kim. "Analyzing AI-based educational platforms for supporting personalized mathematics learning". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2025 20 no. 4 (2025): em0847. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16664

Harvard

Cho, M. K., and Kim, S. (2025). Analyzing AI-based educational platforms for supporting personalized mathematics learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(4), em0847. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16664

MLA

Cho, Mi Kyung et al. "Analyzing AI-based educational platforms for supporting personalized mathematics learning". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 20, no. 4, 2025, em0847. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16664