Relevance of research of this problem caused by the fact that the combination of various forms of work with different families helps to achieve mutual understanding in education of children who have difficulties in adapting in the changing world. Therefore, this article is devoted to disclosure the contents, forms and methods of family education studying based on the differentiated approach. The differentiated approach was based on allocation of groups of the families united by the same parameters. We chose pedagogical means adequate to families with various level of psychological and pedagogical culture. The essential moment was the unacceptability of standardization and unification of work with a family. Materials of the article can be useful for students of pedagogical specialties, for teachers of vocational education and training, and for parents as well.

• Aminov, A. M. (1998). Tatar and Russian folk culture. Kazan, 126.
• Figdor, D. (1995). Children of divorced parents: between trauma and hope. Moscow, 178.
• Filonov, L. B.  (2012). The technique of contact interaction. Moscow, 152.
• Kamalova, L. A. &  Zakirova V. G. (2014). Technique of comparative studying of the Russian and Tatar national fairy tales at modern elementary school in a context of dialogue of cultures. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(1), 33-37.
• Kharisov, F. F. (2000). National culture and education. Moscow, 272.
• Nigmatov, Z. G. (1998). Humanistic traditions of folk pedagogy and educational process. Kazan, 130.
• Ovtcharova, R. V. (2006). Family Academy: questions and answers. Moscow, 68.
• Psavko, B. R. & Starozhitsky P. Y. (2004). Educate family man. Moscow, 80.
• Sokolnikova, E. I. (1997). Ethnopedagogics Chuvash family. Moscow, 384.
• Titarenko, V. J. (1987). Family and personality formation. Moscow, 352.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.