International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Blannin, J. (2022). Beginning teaching with digital technology. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529783285
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Bueno, R. W. d. S., & Niess, M. L. (2023). Redesigning mathematics preservice teachers’ preparation for teaching with technology: A qualitative cross-case analysis using TPACK lenses. Computers & Education, 205, Article 104895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104895
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with Amos basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
• Canonigo, A. M. (2024). Levering AI to enhance students’ conceptual understanding and confidence in mathematics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(6), 3215-3229. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13065
• Chai, C. S., Ling Koh, J. H., Tsai, C.-C., & Lee Wee Tan, L. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
• Dong, Y., Chai, C. S., Sang, G.-Y., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). Exploring the profiles and interplays of pre-service and in-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in China. Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 158-169. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.1.158
• Drijvers, P., Tabach, M., & Vale, C. (2018). Uses of technology in K–12 mathematics education: Concluding remarks. In L. Ball, P. Drijvers, S. Ladel, H.-S. Siller, M. Tabach, & C. Vale (Eds.), Uses of technology in primary and secondary mathematics education tools, topics and trends (pp. 421-435). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76575-4
• Du, W., Cao, Y., Tang, M., Wang, F., & Wang, G. (2025). Factors influencing AI adoption by Chinese mathematics teachers in STEM education. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 20429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-06476-x
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
• Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage Publications.
• Gurer, M. D. (2021). Examining technology acceptance of pre-service mathematics teachers in Turkey: A structural equation modeling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4709-4729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10493-4
• Gurer, M. D., & Akkaya, R. (2022). The influence of pedagogical beliefs on technology acceptance: A structural equation modeling study of pre-service mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(4), 479-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09504-5
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.
• Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
• Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
• Honey, S. (2018). Graphics calculators in the primary classroom: Student-teachers’ beliefs and the TPACK framework. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v25.3.01
• Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506
• Khong, H., Celik, I., Le, T. T. T., Lai, V. T. T., Nguyen, A., & Bui, H. (2023). Examining teachers’ behavioural intention for online teaching after COVID-19 pandemic: A large-scale survey. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5999-6026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11417-6
• Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005
• Klemer, A., Merdler, M., & Peled, Y. (2024). Perceptions, attitudes and approaches of mathematics teachers to remote teaching in an emergency. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(10), 1887-1906. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2376715
• Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
• Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (Vol. 23). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8928-2
• Li, M. (2023). Chinese mathematics teachers’ TPACK and attitudes toward ICT integration in the post-pandemic era. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), Article em2301. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13346
• Li, M., Vale, C., Tan, H., & Blannin, J. (2024). Exploring technological pedagogical readiness (TPR) in China’s primary mathematics teachers: TPR scale validation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 20(7), Article em2469. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14727
• Li, M., Vale, C., Tan, H., & Blannin, J. (2025). Factors influencing the use of digital technologies in primary mathematics teaching: Voices from Chinese educators. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 12573-12608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13309-3
• Mailizar, M., Hidayat, M., & Al-Manthari, A. (2021). Examining the impact of mathematics teachers’ TPACK on their acceptance of online professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(3), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1934613
• Marbán, J. M., & Sintema, E. J. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ TPACK and attitudes toward integration of ICT in mathematics teaching. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v28.1.03
• Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
• Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023). TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480
• Mukuka, A., Shumba, O., & Mulenga, H. M. (2021). Students’ experiences with remote learning during the COVID-19 school closure: Implications for mathematics education. Heliyon, 7(7), Article e07523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07523
• Niess, M. L. (2016). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework for K-12 teacher preparation: Emerging research and opportunities. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1621-7
• Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Polly, D. (2024). Examining TPACK enactment in elementary mathematics with various learning technologies. Education Sciences, 14(10), Article 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101091
• Porras-Hernández, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and the use of teacher’s narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.f
• Rehman, N., Huang, X., Zafeer, H. M. I., & Mohammad, N. K. (2025). Emerging trends and effective strategies in STEM teacher professional development: A systematic review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04272-y
• Sang, G., Liang, J.-C., Chai, C. S., Dong, Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). Teachers’ actual and preferred perceptions of twenty-first century learning competencies: A Chinese perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9522-0
• Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Zhu, C. (2011). Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacher-related variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00383.x
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
• Soriano-Alcantara, J. M., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2024). Exploring digital competencies: Validation and reliability of an instrument for the educational community and for all educational stages. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 307-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09741-6
• State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2025). Opinions on deepening the implementation of the “AI Plus” initiative (No. Guofa [2025] 11). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202508/content_7037862.htm
• Stein, H., Gurevich, I., & Gorev, D. (2019). Integration of technology by novice mathematics teachers – what facilitates such integration and what makes it difficult? Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09950-y
• Sun, F., Tian, P., Sun, D., Fan, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024). Pre‐service teachers’ inclination to integrate AI into STEM education: Analysis of influencing factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 2574-2596. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13469
• Tan, Q., & Yuan, Z. (2024). A professional development course inviting changes in preservice mathematics teachers’ integration of technology into teaching: the lens of instrumental orchestration. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 934. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03408-4
• Teo, T., Milutinovic, V., Zhou, M. M., & Bankovic, D. (2017). Traditional vs. innovative uses of computers among mathematics pre-service teachers in Serbia. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1189943
• Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2020). Effects of a professional development program for teaching mathematics with technology on teachers’ beliefs, self-efficacy and practices. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1411-1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01158-6
• Thurm, D., Li, S., Barzel, B., Fan, L., & Li, N. (2024). Professional development for teaching mathematics with technology: A comparative study of facilitators’ beliefs and practices in China and Germany. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(2), 247-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10284-3
• Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2019). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1
• Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
• Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers & Education, 118, 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
• Yang, J., Wang, Q., Wang, J., Huang, M., & Ma, Y. (2019). A study of K-12 teachers’ TPACK on the technology acceptance of E-schoolbag. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1062-1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1627560
• Yang, Y., Xia, Q., Liu, C., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). The impact of TPACK on teachers’ willingness to integrate generative artificial intelligence (GenAI): The moderating role of negative emotions and the buffering effects of need satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 154, Article 104877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104877
• Yildiz, E., & Arpaci, I. (2024). Understanding pre-service mathematics teachers’ intentions to use GeoGebra: The role of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 18817-18838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12614-1
• Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807

APA

Li, M., Vale, C., Tan, H., & Blannin, J. (2026). Technological pedagogical readiness: Examining TPACK, educational ecosystem, and teacher attitudes in Chinese primary mathematics education. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 21(2), em0880. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18282

Vancouver

Li M, Vale C, Tan H, Blannin J. Technological pedagogical readiness: Examining TPACK, educational ecosystem, and teacher attitudes in Chinese primary mathematics education. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2026;21(2):em0880. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18282

AMA

Li M, Vale C, Tan H, Blannin J. Technological pedagogical readiness: Examining TPACK, educational ecosystem, and teacher attitudes in Chinese primary mathematics education. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2026;21(2), em0880. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18282

Chicago

Li, Mao, Colleen Vale, Hazel Tan, and Jo Blannin. "Technological pedagogical readiness: Examining TPACK, educational ecosystem, and teacher attitudes in Chinese primary mathematics education". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2026 21 no. 2 (2026): em0880. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18282

Harvard

Li, M., Vale, C., Tan, H., and Blannin, J. (2026). Technological pedagogical readiness: Examining TPACK, educational ecosystem, and teacher attitudes in Chinese primary mathematics education. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 21(2), em0880. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18282

MLA

Li, Mao et al. "Technological pedagogical readiness: Examining TPACK, educational ecosystem, and teacher attitudes in Chinese primary mathematics education". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 21, no. 2, 2026, em0880. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/18282