International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Indexed in ESCI
Teachers’ Perceptions of Mathematics Content Knowledge Assessments in Professional Development Courses
APA
In-text citation: (Chamberlin et al., 2008)
Reference: Chamberlin, M. T., Powers, R. A., & Novak, J. D. (2008). Teachers’ Perceptions of Mathematics Content Knowledge Assessments in Professional Development Courses. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(3), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/224
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Chamberlin MT, Powers RA, Novak JD. Teachers’ Perceptions of Mathematics Content Knowledge Assessments in Professional Development Courses. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2008;3(3), 155-178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/224
Chicago
In-text citation: (Chamberlin et al., 2008)
Reference: Chamberlin, Michelle T., Robert A. Powers, and Jodie D. Novak. "Teachers’ Perceptions of Mathematics Content Knowledge Assessments in Professional Development Courses". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2008 3 no. 3 (2008): 155-178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/224
Harvard
In-text citation: (Chamberlin et al., 2008)
Reference: Chamberlin, M. T., Powers, R. A., and Novak, J. D. (2008). Teachers’ Perceptions of Mathematics Content Knowledge Assessments in Professional Development Courses. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(3), pp. 155-178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/224
MLA
In-text citation: (Chamberlin et al., 2008)
Reference: Chamberlin, Michelle T. et al. "Teachers’ Perceptions of Mathematics Content Knowledge Assessments in Professional Development Courses". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 3, no. 3, 2008, pp. 155-178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/224
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Chamberlin MT, Powers RA, Novak JD. Teachers’ Perceptions of Mathematics Content Knowledge Assessments in Professional Development Courses. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2008;3(3):155-78. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/224

Abstract

The goal of this follow-up study was to generalize the findings of a previous inquiry into how assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge within a professional development (PD) course impacted the teachers’ perspective of their learning and their learning experience. This quantitative research study examined whether the teachers’ attitudes about assessments found in the original study were generalizable to a similar population as well as whether factors involving their No Child Left Behind (NCLB) status and prior experience with the PD facilitators were factors affecting their perspectives. Results indicate that the teachers felt that they learned more mathematics, increased their learning efforts, and gained confidence in their understanding of and ability to teach mathematics because they were assessed. Additionally, the teachers’ NCLB status or prior experience in PD with the facilitators had virtually no impact on the teachers’ perceptions about assessment. Characteristics of the PD that led to these results are explained.

References

  • Askov, E. N., Van Horn, B. L., & Carman, P. S. (1997). Assessment in adult basic education programs. In A. D. Rose & M. A. Leahy (Eds.), Assessing Adult Learning in Diverse Settings: Current Issues and Approaches: Vol. 75. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (pp. 65-74). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Basista, B., & Mathews, S. (2002). Integrated science and mathematics professional development programs. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 359-370.
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
  • Campbell, P. F., & White, D. Y. (1997). Project IMPACT: Influencing and supporting teacher change in predominantly minority schools. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics Teachers in Transition (pp. 309-355). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Chamberlin, M. T., Farmer, J., & Novak, J. (in press, to appear in issue 11.6). Teachers’ perceptions of assessments of their mathematical knowledge in a professional development course. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.
  • Cumming, J., & Gal, I. (2000). Assessment in adult numeracy education: Issues and principles for good practice. In I. Gal (Ed.), Adult numeracy development: Theory, research, practice (pp. 305-333). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
  • Farmer, J., Gerretson, H., & Lassak, M. (2003). What teachers take from professional development: Cases and implications. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(4), 331-360.
  • Ginsburg, L., & Gal, I. (2000). Instructional strategies for adult numeracy education. In I. Gal (Ed.), Adult numeracy development: Theory, research, practice (pp. 89-132). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
  • Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351.
  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
  • Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11-30.
  • Kasworm, C. E., & Marienau, C. A. (1997). Principles for assessment of adult learning. In A. D. Rose & M. A. Leahy (Eds.), Assessing Adult Learning in Diverse Settings: Current Issues and Approaches: Vol. 75. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (pp. 5-16). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Ball Publishers.
  • Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s, praise, and other bribes. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Lappan, G. (2000). A vision of learning to teach for the 21st century. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 319- 326.
  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1993). Measuring what counts: A conceptual guide for mathematics assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  • META Associates. (2006). Year 2 evaluation report: January 1, 2005-December 31, 2005. Northeast Front Range Math/Science Partnership (MSP) to Increase Teacher Competence in Content. Unpublished manuscript.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2003). A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  • National Forum on Assessment. (1995). Principles and indicators for student assessment systems. Cambridge, MA: FairTest.
  • OMNI. (2006). Report on math assessment data: Math and science partnerships summer institutes 2005. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Saxe, G. B., Gearhart, M., & Suad Nasir, N. (2001). Enhancing students’ understanding of mathematics: A study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 55- 79.
  • Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From a teachers’ seminar to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 55-87.
  • Strickland, K., & Strickland, J. (1998). Reflections on assessment: Its purposes, methods, and effects on learning. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers Inc.
  • Swafford, J. O., Jones, G. A., & Thornton, C. A. (1997). Increased knowledge in geometry and instructional practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(4), 467-483.
  • Trumbull, E. (2000). Why do we grade – and should we? In E. Trumbull & B. Farr (Eds.), Grading and reporting student progress in an age of standards (pp. 23-44). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.