International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Almeida, L., & Araújo, A. (2014). Aprendizagem e sucesso escolar: variáveis pessoais dos alunos (ADIPSIEDUC Ed.). Braga: ADIPSIEDUC.
• Almeida, L., Guisande, M. A., & Ferreira, A. I. (2009). Inteligência: Perspetivas teóricas. Coimbra: Almedina.
• Almeida, L., & Lemos, G. (2006). Bateria de Provas de Raciocínio: Versões 5/6, 7/9 e 10/12 (Manual Técnico). In. Braga: Universidade do Minho.
• Almeida, L., Miranda, L., Salgado, A., Silva, M., & Martins, V. (2012). Impacto da capacidade cognitiva e das atribuições causais no rendimento escolar na matemática. Quadrante, 11(1), 55-66.
• Alves, M., Coutinho, C., Rocha, A., & Rodrigues, C. (2016). Fatores que influenciam a aprendizagem de conceitos matemáticos em cursos de engenharia: Um estudo exploratório com estudantes da Universidade do Minho. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 29(1), 259-293. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.5998
• Alzahrani, K. S. (2017). Metacognition and its role in mathematics learning: an exploration of the perceptions of a teacher and students in a secondary school. International electronic journal of mathematics education, 12(3), 521-537.
• Asia, S., & OECD. (2018). Teaching for Global Competence in a Rapidly Changing World. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264289024-en
• Ausubel, D., Novak, J., & Hanesian, H. (1980). Psicologia educacional (E. Nick, Trans.). Rio de Janeiro: Interamericana.
• Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20(4), R136-R140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.014
• Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York: Academic Press.
• Bishop, A. J. (2008). Spatial Abilities and Mathematics Education – A Review. In P. Clarkson & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical Issues in Mathematics Education: Major Contributions of Alan Bishop (pp. 71-81). Boston, MA: Springer US.
• Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2004). Seeing the possibilities: Constructing and validating measures of mathematical and analogical reasoning for young children. In Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners (pp. 35-58): Routledge.
• Chung Yen, L., Jacqueline, T., Beatrix, K., & Roi Cohen, K. (2016). The Neuroscience of Mathematical Cognition and LearningIS 136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwmn3ntbr7-en
• Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (pp. 420-464). New York, NY, England: Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
• Cormier, D. C., Bulut, O., McGrew, K. S., & Singh, D. (2017). Exploring the Relations between Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) Cognitive Abilities and Mathematics Achievement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(5), 530-538. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3350
• Corso, L. V., & Dorneles, B. V. (2012). Qual o papel que a memória de trabalho exerce na aprendizagem da matemática? Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 26, 627-648.
• de Koning, E., Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Teaching Inductive Reasoning in Primary Education. Developmental Review, 22(2), 211-241. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2002.0548
• Delamater, A. R., & Lattal, K. M. (2014). The study of associative learning: mapping from psychological to neural levels of analysis. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 108, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2013.12.006
• Devlin, K. (2002). Matemática: a ciência dos padrões. Porto: Porto Editora.
• Elliott, J. (2012). Reconstructing teacher education (Vol. 221): Routledge.
• Embretson, S. E., & McCollam, K. M. S. (2000). Psychometric Approaches to Understanding and Measuring Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 423-444). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• English, L. D. (2013). Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images: Routledge.
• Entwistle, N. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22(3), 201-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132287
• Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1982). Understanding Student Learning (routledge revivals): Routledge.
• Fauskanger, J., & Bjuland, R. (2018). Deep Learning as Constructed in Mathematics Teachers’ Written Discourses. 13(3), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2705
• Findley, K., Whitacre, I., & Hensberry, K. (2017). Integrating Interactive Simulations into the Mathematics Classroom: Supplementing, Enhancing, or Driving? Paper presented at the 39th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Indianapolis. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581367.pdf
• Flanagan, D., & Harrison, E. (2018). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. NY: The Guilford Press.
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
• Floyd, R. G., Evans, J. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2003). Relations between Measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Cognitive Abilities and Mathematics Achievement across the School-Age Years. Psychology in the Schools, 40(2), 155-171.
• Fung, W., & Swanson, H. L. (2017). Working memory components that predict word problem solving: Is it merely a function of reading, calculation, and fluid intelligence? Memory & Cognition, 45(5), 804-823. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0697-0
• Ganda, D. R., & Boruchovitch, E. (2018). A autorregulação da aprendizagem: principais conceitos e modelos teóricos. Psicologia da Educação. Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: Psicologia da Educação. ISSN 2175-3520(46).
• Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: a 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental psychology, 47(6), 1539-1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025510
• Gilligan, K. A., Flouri, E., & Farran, E. K. (2017). The contribution of spatial ability to mathematics achievement in middle childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 163(Supplement C), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.016
• Gomes, C., Brocardo, J., Pedroso, J., Carrillo, J., Ucha, L., Encarnação, M., ... Rodrigues, S. (2017). Perfil dos alunos à saída da escolaridade obrigatória. Ministério da Educação/Direção Geral de Educação
• Green, C., Bunge, S., Chiongbian, V. B., Barrow, M., & Ferrer, E. (2017). Fluid reasoning predicts future mathematical performance among children and adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 157, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.005
• Hansen, N., Jordan, N. C., Fernandez, E., Siegler, R. S., Fuchs, L., Gersten, R., & Micklos, D. (2015). General and math-specific predictors of sixth-graders’ knowledge of fractions. Cognitive Development, 35, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.02.001
• Haverty, L. A., Koedinger, K. R., Klahr, D., & Alibali, M. W. (2000). Solving inductive reasoning problems in mathematics: not-so-trivial pursuit. Cognitive Science, 24(2), 249-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(00)00019-7
• Inglis, M., & Simpson, A. (2009). Conditional inference and advanced mathematical study: further evidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9187-z
• Joly, M. C. R. A., Muner, L. C., Silva, D. V., & Prieto, G. (2011). Visualização espacial e desempenho em matemática no ensino médio e profissional. Avaliação Psicológica, 10, 181-191.
• Julià, C., & Antolì, J. Ò. (2017). Enhancing spatial ability and mechanical reasoning through a STEM course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9428-x
• Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2009). Associative learning predicts intelligence above and beyond working memory and processing speed. Intelligence, 37(4), 374-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.03.004
• Kell, H. J., & Lubinski, D. (2013). Spatial Ability: A Neglected Talent in Educational and Occupational Settings. 35(4), 219.
• Knowlton, B., L.M. Siegel, A., & D. Moody, T. (2017). Procedural Learning in Humans. In.
• Kösa, T. (2016). Effects of Using Dynamic Mathematics Software on Preservice Mathematics Teachers' Spatial Visualization Skills: The Case of Spatial Analytic Geometry. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(7), 449-458.
• Lannin, J., Ellis, A., Elliot, R., & Zbiek, R. M. (2011). Developing Essential Understanding of Mathematical Reasoning for Teaching Mathematics in Grades Pre-K–8. Reston: NCTM.
• Legg, S., & Hutter, M. (2007). A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence. In B. Goertzel & P. Wang (Eds.), Advances in Artificial General Intelligence: Concepts, Architectures and Algorithms (pp. 17-24): IOS Press.
• Lemos, G., Casanova, J., & Almeida, L. (2015). Habilidades cognitivas e interesses vocacionais na adolescência: Promovendo percursos de sucesso. In G. Lemos & L. Almeida (Eds.), Cognição e aprendizagem: Promoção do sucesso escolar (pp. 35-67).
• Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. 49(4), 344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022
• M. Laamena, C., Nusantara, T., Irawan, E., & Muksar, M. (2018). How do the Undergraduate Students Use an Example in Mathematical Proof Construction: A Study based on Argumentation and Proving Activity (Vol. 13).
• Martin, W. (2009). Making Reasoning and Sense Making the Focus for Mathematics Education. In. Reston, VA: NCTM.
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I — Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
• Mata-Pereira, J., & Ponte, J.-P. (2017). Enhancing students’ mathematical reasoning in the classroom: teacher actions facilitating generalization and justification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 169-186.
• McGrew. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1 (Editorial)), 1-10.
• McGrew, & Evans. (2004). Internal and External Factorial Extensions to the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Theory of Cognitive Abilities: A Review of Factor Analytic Research since Carroll's Seminal 1993 Treatise. Retrieved from http://www.iapsych.com/HCARR2.pdf
• McGrew, & Wendling. (2010). Cattell–Horn–Carroll cognitive-achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 651-675. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20497
• Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000855
• Molnár, G., Greiff, S., & Csapó, B. (2013). Inductive reasoning, domain specific and complex problem solving: Relations and development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.03.002
• Mondragón, E., Alonso, E., & Kokkola, N. (2017). Associative Learning Should Go Deep. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 822-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.001
• Mulligan, J. (2015). Looking within and beyond the geometry curriculum: connecting spatial reasoning to mathematics learning. 47(3), 511-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0696-1
• Murtonen, M., Gruber, H., & Lehtinen, E. (2017). The return of behaviourist epistemology: A review of learning outcomes studies. Educational Research Review, 22, 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.001
• NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. In (Vol. 1). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• NCTM. (2009). Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making. In. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc.
• Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard Jr, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., . . . Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American psychologist, 51(2), 77.
• Nisbett. (2016). Culture and Intelligence. In: London School of Economics and Political Science.
• Nisbett, Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D., & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence New Findings and Theoretical Developments (Vol. 67).
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Evans, D., Bell, D., Gardner, S., Gardner, A., & Carraher, J. (2007). The contribution of logical reasoning to the learning of mathematics in primary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(1), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151006X153127
• OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving: Students’ Skills in Tackling Real-Life Problems. In (PISA ed., Vol. 5): OECD Publishing.
• Oliveira, A. B. d., Osório, A. J., & Dourado, L. G. P. (2018, 2018). Compreender a Biologia através do Design de Jogos Digitais: Programando nova estratégia na formação de professores. Paper presented at the Encontro Internacional "A Voz dos Professores de Ciência e Tecnologia".
• Ponte, J. P. d., Mata-Pereira, J., & Henriques, A. (2012a). O raciocínio matemático nos alunos do ensino básico e do ensino superior. Praxis Educativa, 7, 355-377.
• Ponte, J. P. d., Mata-Pereira, J., & Henriques, A. (2012b). O raciocínio matemático nos alunos do ensino básico e do ensino superior.
• Prieto, G., & Velasco, A. D. (2008). Entrenamiento de la visualización espacial mediante ejercicios informatizados de dibujo técnico. Psicologia escolar e educacional, 309-317.
• Primi, R., Ferrão, M. E., & Almeida, L. S. (2010). Fluid intelligence as a predictor of learning: A longitudinal multilevel approach applied to math. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 446-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001
• Pólya, G. (1990). Mathematics and plausible reasoning: Induction and analogy in mathematics (Vol. 1): Princeton University Press.
• Resnick. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
• Resnick, M. (1997). Mathematics as a science of patterns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Richland, L. E., & Hansen, J. (2013). Reducing cognitive load in learning by analogy. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 5(4), 69.
• Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In D. Flanagan & P. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues, 3rd ed. (pp. 99-144). New York: Guilford Press.
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grows (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.
• Schwartz, F., Epinat-Duclos, J., Léone, J., & Prado, J. (2017). The neural development of conditional reasoning in children: Different mechanisms for assessing the logical validity and likelihood of conclusions. NeuroImage, 163, 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.029
• Scott, C. L. (2015). The Futures of learning 2: what kind of learning for the 21st century? In Education, research and foresight: working papers (UNESCO) (14th november 2015 ed.).
• Shute, V. J. (1992). Learning processes and learning outcomes. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2 ed., pp. 3315-3325). New York: Pergamon.
• Sinclair, N., Bartolini Bussi, M. G., de Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A., & Owens, K. (2016). Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report. ZDM, 48(5), 691-719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0796-6
• Stelzer, F., Andrés, M. L., Canet Juric, L., Urquijo, S., & Marta Richards, M. (2019). Influence of Domain-General Abilities and Prior Division Competence on Fifth-Graders’ Fraction Understanding (Vol. 14).
• Sternberg, R. J. (1983). Components of human intelligence. Cognition, 15(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90032-X
• Stevenson, C. E., Bergwerff, C. E., Heiser, W. J., & Resing, W. C. M. (2014). Working Memory and Dynamic Measures of Analogical Reasoning as Predictors of Children's Math and Reading Achievement. Infant & Child Development, 23(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1833
• Szűcs, D., Devine, A., Soltesz, F., Nobes, A., & Gabriel, F. (2014). Cognitive components of a mathematical processing network in 9-year-old children. Developmental science, 17(4), 506-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12144
• Säljö, R. (1979). Learning about learning. Higher Education, 8(4), 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680533
• UNESCO. (2016). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656
• Vale, I. (2013). Patterns in figurative contexts: a way to the generalization in mathematics. Revemat: Revista Eletrônica de Educação Matemática, 8(2), 64-81.
• Wang, T., Ren, X., & Schweizer, K. (2017). Learning and retrieval processes predict fluid intelligence over and above working memory. Intelligence, 61, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.12.005
• Yen, L., Jacqueline, T., Beatrix, K., & Cohen, K. (2016). The Neuroscience of Mathematical Cognition and Learning. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwmn3ntbr7-en
• Yildiz, S. G., & Özdemir, A. S. (2017). Development of the Spatial Ability Test for Middle School Students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(4), 41-54.
• Zakeri, J., & Khatibi, M. B. (2014). A Much-needed Boost to EFL Learners’ Vocabulary; The Role of Associative Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1983-1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.632
• Zimmerman, B. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview (Vol. 25).

APA

Brito, L. P., Almeida, L. S., & Osório, A. J. M. (2020). Reasoning Abilities and Learning Math: A Möbius Strip?. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0565. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6259

Vancouver

Brito LP, Almeida LS, Osório AJM. Reasoning Abilities and Learning Math: A Möbius Strip?. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(2):em0565. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6259

AMA

Brito LP, Almeida LS, Osório AJM. Reasoning Abilities and Learning Math: A Möbius Strip?. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(2), em0565. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6259

Chicago

Brito, Luciana Pereira, Leandro Silva Almeida, and António José Meneses Osório. "Reasoning Abilities and Learning Math: A Möbius Strip?". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 2 (2020): em0565. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6259

Harvard

Brito, L. P., Almeida, L. S., and Osório, A. J. M. (2020). Reasoning Abilities and Learning Math: A Möbius Strip?. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0565. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6259

MLA

Brito, Luciana Pereira et al. "Reasoning Abilities and Learning Math: A Möbius Strip?". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 2, 2020, em0565. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6259