International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Professional Learning Opportunities Regarding the Concept of Function in a Practice-based Teacher Education Program
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Trevisan AL, Ribeiro AJ, Ponte JPD. Professional Learning Opportunities Regarding the Concept of Function in a Practice-based Teacher Education Program. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(2), em0563. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6256
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Trevisan et al., 2020)
Reference: Trevisan, A. L., Ribeiro, A. J., & Ponte, J. P. D. (2020). Professional Learning Opportunities Regarding the Concept of Function in a Practice-based Teacher Education Program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0563. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6256
Chicago
In-text citation: (Trevisan et al., 2020)
Reference: Trevisan, André Luis, Alessandro Jacques Ribeiro, and João Pedro da Ponte. "Professional Learning Opportunities Regarding the Concept of Function in a Practice-based Teacher Education Program". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 2 (2020): em0563. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6256
Harvard
In-text citation: (Trevisan et al., 2020)
Reference: Trevisan, A. L., Ribeiro, A. J., and Ponte, J. P. D. (2020). Professional Learning Opportunities Regarding the Concept of Function in a Practice-based Teacher Education Program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0563. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6256
MLA
In-text citation: (Trevisan et al., 2020)
Reference: Trevisan, André Luis et al. "Professional Learning Opportunities Regarding the Concept of Function in a Practice-based Teacher Education Program". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 2, 2020, em0563. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6256
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Trevisan AL, Ribeiro AJ, Ponte JPD. Professional Learning Opportunities Regarding the Concept of Function in a Practice-based Teacher Education Program. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(2):em0563. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6256

Abstract

Teachers’ professional knowledge has been an active area in the field of mathematics education research in the last decades, but we still know very little regarding how teachers learn. This article aims to identify learning opportunities experienced by two teachers regarding mathematical and didactical knowledge for the teaching of function, in a context of practice-based learning. To this end, we analyze data from a practice-based teacher education program based on a cycle that incorporates three segments of teachers’ practice: planning, enacting and reflecting on a high school mathematics lesson, conducted from the perspective of inquiry-based teaching. We analyze two strands of the professional knowledge mobilized by the teachers, namely (i) the mathematics knowledge for teaching function, (ii) the knowledge for teaching practice, regarding function. The results indicate learning opportunities that emerged from the work done, regarding the use of the classroom as a teaching professional learning environment: the search for ways to encourage students to participate in the discussions; the recognition of the potential of the chosen lesson plan for the covariational approach , the importance of organizing mathematical discussion practices for students’ learning, organizing the time devoted to whole-class discussions and preparing for leading them and the potential of a class developed from the perspective of inquiry-based teaching.

References

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  • Ball, D. L., & Even, R. (2009). Strengthening practice in and research on the professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: Next steps. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.). The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI study (pp. 255-257). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09601-8_27
  • Bisognin, E., Bisognin, V., & Cury, H. N. (2010). Conhecimentos de professores da educação básica sobre o conceito de função. In Anais do X Encontro Nacional de Educação Matemática. Brasília, SBEM.
  • Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1994). Investigação qualitativa em educação. Porto: Porto Editora.
  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M.E. (2008). Video as a Tool for Fostering Productive Discussions in Mathematics Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
  • Charalambous, Y. C., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2016). Perspectives on Priority Mathematics Education: Unpacking and Understanding a Complex Relationship Linking Teacher Knowledge, Teaching, and Learning. In: L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (3rd Ed., pp. 19-59), New York.
  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
  • Esteban, M. P. S. (2010). Pesquisa qualitativa em educação: fundamentos e tradições. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
  • Even, R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(6), 521-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315943
  • Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2014) Mathematics teachers’ learning: a conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9245-4
  • Mestre, C. M. M. V. (2014). O desenvolvimento do pensamento algébrico de alunos do 4.º ano de escolaridade: uma experiência de ensino (Ph.D. Thesis in Education), Universidade de Lisboa. Lisboa.
  • Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: Conceptual overview of lesson study. In: L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 1-12). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9941-9_1
  • O’Donnell, B., & Taylor, A. (2007). A lesson plan as professional development? You’ve got be kidding. Teaching Children Mathematics, 272-278.
  • Pazuch, V., & Ribeiro, A. J. (2017). Conhecimento profissional de professores de matemática e o conceito de função: uma revisão de literatura. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 19, 465-496. https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2017v19i1p465-496
  • Ponte, J. P. (2005). Gestão curricular em Matemática. In: GTI (Ed.). O professor e o desenvolvimento curricular (pp. 11-34). Lisboa: APM.
  • Ponte, J. P. (2012). Estudando o conhecimento e o desenvolvimento profissional do professor de matemática. In: N. Planas (Ed.), Educación matematics: Teoría, critica y prática. Barcelona: Graó.
  • Ponte, J. P. (2014). Tarefas no ensino e na aprendizagem da Matemática. In: J. P. da Ponte (Org.). Práticas profissionais dos professores de matemática (pp. 13-27). Lisboa: Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.
  • Ponte, J. P. (2017). Discussões coletivas no ensino-aprendizagem em Matemática. In: GTI (Ed.). A prática dos professores: planificação e discussão coletiva na sala de aula (pp. 33-56). Lisboa: APM.
  • Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2016). Prospective mathematics teachers’ learning and knowledge for teaching. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 275-296). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis
  • Ponte, J. P., Mata-Pereira, J., Quaresma, M., & Velez, I. (2017). Formação de professores dos primeiros anos em articulação com o contexto de prática de ensino de matemática. Relime, 20(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.17.2013
  • Ponte, J. P., Quaresma, M., Mata-Pereira, J., & Baptista, M. (2016). O estudo de aula como processo de desenvolvimento profissional de professores de matemática. BOLEMA, 30(56), 868-891. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v30n56a01
  • Ribeiro, A. J., & Ponte, J. P. (2019). Professional learning opportunities in a practice-based teacher education program about the concept of function. Acta Scientiae, 21, 49-74. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.v21iss2id5002
  • Serrazina, L. (2017). Planificação do ensino-aprendizagem da Matemática. In: GTI (Ed.), A prática dos professores: planificação e discussão coletiva na sala de aula (pp. 9-32). Lisboa: APM.
  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Silver, E. A. (2009).Toward a More Complete Understanding of Practice-Based Professional Development for Mathematics Teachers. In: R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The Professional Education and Development of Teachers of Mathematics: the 15th. ICMI study (pp. 245-247). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09601-8_25
  • Silver., E. A., Clark, L. M., Ghousseini, H. N., Charalambous, Y. C., & Sealy, J. T. (2007) Where is the mathematics? Examining teachers’ mathematical learning opportunities in practice-based professional learning tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4-6), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9039-7
  • Smith, E. (2008). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In: J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early years (pp. 133-160). Reston, VA: NCTM. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097435-6
  • Smith, E., & Confrey, J. (1994). Multiplicative structures and the development of logarithms: what was lost by the invention of function. In: G. Harel, & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 333-360).
  • Smith, M. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating Productive Mathematical Discussions: Five Practices for Helping Teachers Move beyond Show and Tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
  • Thompson, P. W. (1990). A theoretical model of quantity-based reasoning in arithmetic and algebraic. Center for Research in Mathematics & Science Education: San Diego State University.
  • Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the undergraduate mathematics curriculum. In: E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education I (pp. 21-44). Providence: American Mathematical Society.
  • Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In: J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421-456). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Webster-Wright, A. (2009) Reframing Professional Development through Understanding Authentic Professional Learning. Review of Educational Research, 79, 702-739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308330970
  • Zuffi, E. M., & Pacca, J. L. A. (2012). O conceito de função e sua linguagem para os professores de matemática e de ciências. Ciência & Educação, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132002000100001

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.