Submit Manuscript

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Indexed in ESCI
Mobile Learning Features Preferred: An Examination of Students in The United Arab Emirates
Jason D. Johnson 1 * , Cara Williams 2
1 Zayed University, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES2 Emirates College for Advanced Education, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
* Corresponding Author
APA
In-text citation: (Johnson & Williams, 2020)
Reference: Johnson, J. D., & Williams, C. (2020). Mobile Learning Features Preferred: An Examination of Students in The United Arab Emirates. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0596. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8325
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Johnson JD, Williams C. Mobile Learning Features Preferred: An Examination of Students in The United Arab Emirates. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3), em0596. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8325
Chicago
In-text citation: (Johnson and Williams, 2020)
Reference: Johnson, Jason D., and Cara Williams. "Mobile Learning Features Preferred: An Examination of Students in The United Arab Emirates". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 3 (2020): em0596. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8325
Harvard
In-text citation: (Johnson and Williams, 2020)
Reference: Johnson, J. D., and Williams, C. (2020). Mobile Learning Features Preferred: An Examination of Students in The United Arab Emirates. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0596. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8325
MLA
In-text citation: (Johnson and Williams, 2020)
Reference: Johnson, Jason D. et al. "Mobile Learning Features Preferred: An Examination of Students in The United Arab Emirates". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 3, 2020, em0596. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8325
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Johnson JD, Williams C. Mobile Learning Features Preferred: An Examination of Students in The United Arab Emirates. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(3):em0596. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8325

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the preferred mobile learning features higher education Emirati students use to make sense of mathematics and to determine if these Emirati students valued a mobile device as an essential tool to learn mathematics. Both students and instructors used the Texas Instruments Nspire: Computer Algebra System (CAS) App in a semester mathematics course. The app has such features as enter expressions in proper mathematics notation, import images, dynamically linked notes, share work across platforms (emails, iTunes, Dropbox, etc.), and save documents to mobile device. Participates included sixty-three undergraduate students enrolled in a mathematics course at Zayed University (Dubai campus, United Arab Emirates). Based on a pre- and post-survey, students’ positive perspectives of mathematics increased, negative perspectives decreased, and instructor influence on mobile learning increased. The pre- and post-questionnaire revealed an increase in the participants’ opinion that mobile learning is an essential tool to help make sense of mathematics.

Keywords

Middle East United Arab Emirates TI-Nspire CAS App university mathematics

References

  • Baya’a, N., & Daher, W., (2009). Student perceptions of mathematics learning using mobile phones. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications. In L. Ricci & V. Boccardi (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Computer Aided Learning (IMCL), 22-24 April (pp.1-9).
  • Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Digital tools for algebra education: Criteria and evaluation. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-010-9162-x
  • Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2011). Effects of feedback conditions for an online algebra tool. In M. Joubert, A. Clark-Wilson, & M. McCabe (Eds.). Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference for Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTM) (pp. 81-86).
  • Bull, P. H., & McCormick, C. (2011). Mobile learning: Enhancing a pre-algebra course at a communitycollege with text messaging. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 8(1), 25-36.
  • Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 514-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326097
  • Cayton-Hodges, G. A., Feng, G., & Pan, X. (2015). Tablet-based math assessment: What can we learn from math apps? Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 3-20.
  • Franklin, T., & Peng, L.-W. (2008). Mobile math: Math educators and students engage in mobile learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(2), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-008-9005-0
  • Glaser, B. G. (2001). The future of grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 1, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206-1
  • Harrison, T. R. (2013). The evaluation of iPad applications for the learning of mathematics (Masters of Science Thesis), North Carolina State University.
  • Hewitt, D. (2012). Young students learning formal algebraic notation and solving linear equations: Are commonly experienced difficulties avoidable? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(2), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9394-x
  • Johnson, J. D. (2010). Prospective middle grades teachers of mathematics using hand-held CAS technology to create rich mathematical task. Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Mathematics Education. 5, 42-54.
  • Kalloo, V., & Mohan, P. (2012). Correlation questionnaire data with actual usage of data in a mobile learning study for high school mathematics. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(1), 76-89.
  • Kiger, D., Herro, D., & Prunty, D. (2012). Examining the influence of a mobile learning intervention on third grade math achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782597
  • Kim, Y., Lim, C., Choi, H., & Hahn, M. (2012, August). Effects on training mathematics problem solving behaviors using a tablet computer. Paper presented at the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Hong Kong. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360299
  • Loch, B., Galligan, L., Hobohm, C., & McDonald, C. (2011). Learner-centred mathematics and statistics education using netbook tablet PCs. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 939-949. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.611910
  • McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger III, H. L. (2011). Test enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 399-414. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021782
  • Meyer, B. (2014). iPads in learning: The web of change. In M. B. Nunes & M. McPherson (Eds.), The International Conference on e-Learning. Proceedings of the Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (MCCSIS), Lisbon, Portugal, 15-19 July (pp. 13-20). International Association for Development of the Information Society.
  • Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Salkind, G., & Bolyard, J.J. (2008). Virtual manipulatives used by K-8 teachers for mathematics instruction: Considering mathematical, cognitive, and pedagogical fidelity. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 202-218.
  • NCTM. (1998). Principles and Standards of School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Peled, S., & Schocken, S. (2014). Mobile learning and early age mathematics. In I. A. Sánchez, & P. Isaías (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2014. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2014, Madrid, Spain, 19 - 25 February (pp.19 - 25). International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS).
  • Polly, D. (2011). Technology to develop algebraic reasoning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(8), 472-478.
  • Rikala, J. (2014). Evaluating QR codes case studies using a mobile learning framework. In I. A. Sánchez, & P. Isaías (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2014. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2014, Madrid, Spain, 19 - 25 February (pp. 199-206). International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS).
  • Roberts, N., & Vänskä, R. (2011). Challenging assumptions: Mobile learning for mathematics project in south Africa. Distance Education, 32(2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.584850
  • Santos, I. M. (2013). Integrating personal mobile devices in teaching: The impact on student learning and institutional support. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 10(2), 43-63.
  • Santos, I. M. (2014). Mobile devices in higher education classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. In J. Keengwe (Eds). Promoting active learning through the integration of mobile and ubiquitous technologies (pp. 37-54). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6343-5.ch003
  • Santos, I. M., & Ali, N. (2012). Beyond classroom: The uses of mobile phones by female students. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2012010107
  • Traxler. J. (2009). The evolution of mobile learning. In R. Guy (Ed.), The evolution of mobile teaching and learning (pp. 1-14). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.
  • Tsuei, M., Chou, H.-Y., & Chen, B.-S. (2013). Measuring usability of the Mobile Mathematics curriculum-based measurement application with children. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, User Experience, and Usability. Health, Learning, Playing, Cultural, and Cross-Cultural User Experience (pp. 304-310). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39241-2_34
  • Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 54-75. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2009040104
  • Zaranis, N., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Using mobile devices for teaching realistic mathematics in kindergarten education. Creative Education, 4(7A1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.47A1001
  • Zelkowski, J. (May, 2011). The TI-Nspire CAS: A happy-medium mobile device for Grades 8-16 mathematics classrooms. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 55(3), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0496-6

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
e-ISSN: 1306-3030 | Publisher: Modestum LTD