International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

• Abrahamson, D. (2010). A tempest in a teapot is but a drop in the ocean: Action-objects in analogical mathematical reasoning. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9^th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 492-499). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
• Abrahamson, D. (2012). Try to see it my way: The discursive function of idiosyncratic mathematical metaphor. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14, 55-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.625076
• Arroyo, R. L., McDermott, B., & Tchoshanov, M. (2012). Assessing Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Disposition Toward Mathematics Using Open-Ended Metaphor. In L. R. Van Zoest, J.-J. Lo, & J. L. Kratky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North America, Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University (pp. 689-692).
• Bass, H., & Mosvold, R. (2019). Teacher responses to public apparent student error: A critical confluence of mathematics and equitable teaching practice. In Proceedings of the 11^th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education Freudenthal Institute.
• Beyers, J. (2011). Student dispositions with respect to mathematics: What current literature says. In D. J. Brahier, & W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics (pp. 69-80). NCTM.
• Bieg, M., Goetz, T., Sticca, F., Brunner, E., Becker, E., Morger, V., & Hubbard, K. (2017). Teaching methods and their impact on students’ emotions in mathematics: An experience-sampling approach. ZDM, 49(3), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0840-1
• Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She’s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one”: Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34-74. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0034
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
• Bullough Jr, R. V. (2014). Methods for studying beliefs. In H. Fives, & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 150-170). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108437-16
• Burton, M., Maiorca, C., & Tripp, L. O. (2022). The relationship between teacher candidates’ affective dispositions and instructional planning actions in STEM. Education Sciences, 12(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020082
• Cai, J., & Merlino, J. (2011). Metaphors: A powerful means for assessing students’ mathematical disposition. In D. J. Brahier, & W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics (pp. 147-156). NCTM.
• Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., Robison, V., & Hiebert, J. (2017). Making classroom implementation an integral part of research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 342-347. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.4.0342
• Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities. Equinox.
• Carey, M. A. (1994). The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing and interpreting focus group research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 225-241). SAGE.
• Davis, B. (2005). Complexity and education: Some vital simultaneities. In Proceedings of the 2005 Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference (pp. 13-30).
• Davis, B. (2008). Complexity and education: Vital simultaneities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00402.x
• Davis, B., & Phelps, R. (2005). Exploring the common spaces of education and complexity: Transphenomenality, transdisciplinarity, and interdiscursivity. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8723
• Davis, B., Towers, J., Chapman, O., Drefs, M., & Friesen, S. (2020). Exploring the relationship between mathematics teachers’ implicit associations and their enacted practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23, 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09430-7
• Douglas, K. (2009). Sharpening our focus in measuring classroom instruction. Educational Researcher, 38(7), 518-521. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09350881
• Dragon, T., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burleson, W., El Kaliouby, R., & Eydgahi, H. (2008). Viewing student affect and learning through classroom observation and physical sensors. In B. P. Woolf, E. Aïmeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 29-39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_8
• Eisenhard, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
• Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.31
• Fels, L. (2004). Complexity, teacher education and the restless jury: Pedagogical moments of performance. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8716
• Ferreira, P. (2001). Tracing complexity theory: For ESD. Research Seminar in Engineering Systems. http://web.mit.edu/esd.83/www/notebook/ESD83-Complexity.doc
• Fonseca-Chacana, J. (2019). Making teacher disposition explicit: A participatory approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77(2019), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.018
• Gerson, H., Hyer, C., & Walter, J. (2011). Mark’s development of productive disposition and motivation. In D. J. Brahier, & W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics (pp. 69-80). NCTM.
• Handal, B. (2008). Metaphors in education. https://bahai-library.com/pdf/h/handal_metaphors_education.pdf
• Harré, R. (2011). Foreword. In M. B. McVee, C. H. Brock, & J. A. Glazier (Eds.), Sociocultural positioning in literacy: Exploring culture, discourse, narrative, and power in diverse educational contexts (pp. ix-xi). Hampton Press.
• Harré, R. (2012). Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 191-206). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.013.0010
• Hartley, J. F. (1994). Case studies in organizational research. In C. Cassell (Ed.), Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide. SAGE.
• Helmer, O. (1967) Analysis of the future: The Delphi method. The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD0649640
• Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.
• Karolia, M. (2022). A study into the use of metaphors, the narratives they represent, and the application of the clean language questioning model as a method of reflection within an HE context [Doctoral dissertation, University of Huddersfield].
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE.
• Miller, J., & Glassner, B. (2004). The “inside” and “outside”: Finding realities in interviews. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 125-139). SAGE.
• Lynch-Arroyo, R. L. (2013). Complexity of affective disposition and reflective transphenomenality: An exploratory study of middle school mathematics teacher and student self-positioning and positioning-by-others toward mathematics, mathematics teaching, and learning (3609495) [Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at El Paso].  ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
• Presmeg, N. (1992). Prototypes, metaphors, metonymies, and imaginative rationality in high school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(6), 595-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540062
• Presmeg, N. (1998). Metaphoric and metonymic signification in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)80059-5
• Rodríguez, A. J. (2005). Teachers’ resistance to ideological and pedagogical change: Definitions, theoretical framework, and significance. In A. J. Rodriguez, & R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 1-16).
• Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375.
• Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66-70.
• Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1-21.
• Tchoshanov, M. (2013). Engineering of learning: Conceptualizing e-didactics. UNESCO: Institute for Information Technologies in Education.
• Uljens, M. (1997). School didactics and learning. Psychology Press Ltd.
• van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning as the production and use of stereotypes. In R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 127-137). Blackwell Publishers, Inc.
• West, C., Baker, A., Ehrich, J. F., Woodcock, S., Bokosmaty, S., Howard, S. J., & Eady, M. J. (2020)​. Teacher disposition scale (TDS): Construction and psychometric validation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1527022
• Weston, C., Gandell, T. Beauchamp, J., McAlpine, L., Wiseman, C., & Beauchamp, C. (2001). Analyzing interview data: The development and evolution of a coding system. Qualitative Sociology, 24(3), 381-400.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010690908200
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.

APA

Lynch-Arroyo, R. L., Tchoshanov, M., & Medina-Jerez, W. (2023). Math is beautifully intimidating: Analyzing the conflict between teacher affective disposition and observed positioning-by-others. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(1), em0722. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12627

Vancouver

Lynch-Arroyo RL, Tchoshanov M, Medina-Jerez W. Math is beautifully intimidating: Analyzing the conflict between teacher affective disposition and observed positioning-by-others. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(1):em0722. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12627

AMA

Lynch-Arroyo RL, Tchoshanov M, Medina-Jerez W. Math is beautifully intimidating: Analyzing the conflict between teacher affective disposition and observed positioning-by-others. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2023;18(1), em0722. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12627

Chicago

Lynch-Arroyo, Ruby L., Mourat Tchoshanov, and William Medina-Jerez. "Math is beautifully intimidating: Analyzing the conflict between teacher affective disposition and observed positioning-by-others". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2023 18 no. 1 (2023): em0722. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12627

Harvard

Lynch-Arroyo, R. L., Tchoshanov, M., and Medina-Jerez, W. (2023). Math is beautifully intimidating: Analyzing the conflict between teacher affective disposition and observed positioning-by-others. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(1), em0722. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12627

MLA

Lynch-Arroyo, Ruby L. et al. "Math is beautifully intimidating: Analyzing the conflict between teacher affective disposition and observed positioning-by-others". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 18, no. 1, 2023, em0722. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12627