Submit a Manuscript

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
  • e-ISSN: 1306-3030
  • First published in 2006
JOURNAL ARCHIVE
Impact of Using Graphing Calculator in Problem Solving
Mary Ann Serdina Parrot 1, Kwan Eu Leong 1 *
1 University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
* Corresponding Author
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Parrot MAS, Leong KE. Impact of Using Graphing Calculator in Problem Solving. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2018;13(3), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2704
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Parrot & Leong, 2018)
Reference: Parrot, M. A. S., & Leong, K. E. (2018). Impact of Using Graphing Calculator in Problem Solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2704
Chicago
In-text citation: (Parrot and Leong, 2018)
Reference: Parrot, Mary Ann Serdina, and Kwan Eu Leong. "Impact of Using Graphing Calculator in Problem Solving". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2018 13 no. 3 (2018): 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2704
Harvard
In-text citation: (Parrot and Leong, 2018)
Reference: Parrot, M. A. S., and Leong, K. E. (2018). Impact of Using Graphing Calculator in Problem Solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), pp. 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2704
MLA
In-text citation: (Parrot and Leong, 2018)
Reference: Parrot, Mary Ann Serdina et al. "Impact of Using Graphing Calculator in Problem Solving". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2018, pp. 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2704
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Parrot MAS, Leong KE. Impact of Using Graphing Calculator in Problem Solving. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2018;13(3):139-48. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2704

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of graphing calculator on students’ problem solving success in solving linear equation problems and their attitude toward problem solving in mathematics. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent control and treatment group using the pre-test post-test design was employed in this study to test the hypotheses. The sample of the study involved two Form Four classes from one public secondary school in Sarawak, Malaysia. Students in the experimental group received problem solving based instruction using graphing calculator while the control group students underwent the traditional chalk and talk method without the graphing technology. Two instruments were used in this study, namely the Linear Equation Problem Solving Test and the Mathematical Problem Solving Questionnaire. Findings of this study show existence of a significant difference in the mean scores between the two groups; students who used graphing calculator performed better in problem solving tasks compared to students without access to graphing calculator. Furthermore, a questionnaire was used to obtain students’ attitude toward problem solving in mathematics. Results from the survey revealed that students who use graphing calculator have a better attitude toward problem solving in mathematics. This study is pertinent as it investigates a different approach in teaching linear equation through problem solving while integrating the latest graphing calculator technology in the lessons.

Keywords

graphing calculator linear equations problem solving success secondary students

References

  • Allison, J. A. (2000). High school students’ problem solving with a graphing calculator. (9994081 Ph.D.), University of Georgia, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304595892?accountid=28930 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database
  • Andersson, U., & Lyxell, B. (2007). Working memory deficit in children with mathematical difficulties: a general or specific deficit? Journal of Exceptional Children Psychology, 96(3), 197-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.10.001
  • Bitter, G. G., & Hatfield, M. M. (1991). Here’s a math-teaching strategy that’s calculated to work. Executive Educator, 13, 19-21.
  • Bryant, D. P. (2009). Working with your child’s teacher to identify and address math disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/article/34659/
  • Carter, H. H. (1995). A visual approach to understanding the function concept using graphing calculators. (9602812 Ph.D.), Georgia State University, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304199069?accountid=28930 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
  • Cavanagh, M., & Mitchelmore, M. (2000). Student misconceptions in interpreting basic graphic displays. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Center for Technology in Learning. (2007). Why should a teacher use technology in his or her mathematics classroom? In T. Instruments (Ed.). United Kingdom: SRI International.
  • Charles, R., Lester, F., & O’Daffer, P. (1987). How to evaluate progress in problem solving. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Chen, J. C., & Lai, Y. N. (2015). A Brief review of researchers on the use of graphing calculator in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 14(2), 163-172.
  • Choi-Koh, S. S. (2003). Effect of a Graphing Calculator on a 10th-Grade Student’s Study of Trigonometry. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309596619
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
  • Conway, K. E. (1996). Differential effects of single-sex versus coed education on the mathematical reasoning ability, verbal reasoning ability, and self-concept of high school girls. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57(12), 5047A.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Pearson College Division.
  • Crippen, K. J. (1999). Problem solving suggestions for graphing calculators Retrieved from http://dwb.unl.edu/calculators/help/variables.html
  • Dibble, A. J. (2013). Impact of Graphing Calculators on Students’ Problem-Solving Abilities and Students’ Attitudes towards Mathematics. (1523829 M.S.E.), Southwest Minnesota State University, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1441947194?accountid=28930 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
  • Doerr, H. M., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating Meaning for and with the Graphing Calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/3483187
  • Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education: McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Halmos, P. R. (1980). The Heart of Mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 87(7), 519-524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2321415
  • Hatem, N. (2010). The effect of graphing calculators on student achievement in college algebra and pre-calculus mathematics courses. (3438537 Ed.D.), University of Massachusetts Lowell, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/847259113?accountid=28930 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
  • Hunter, J. S. (2011). The Effects of Graphing Calculator use on High-School Students’ Reasoning in Integral Calculus. (3463473 Ph.D.), University of New Orleans, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/879337423?accountid=28930 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
  • Kadir, Z. A., Kadir, Z. A., Bejor, J., Nathiman, R., Moamed, B., & Khamis, J. (2003). Meningkatkan Kemahiran Membentuk Ungkapan Kuadratik. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 7(2003), 12-19.
  • Karadeniz, I. (2015). UCSMP Teachers’ Perspectives when Using Graphing Calculators in Advanced Mathematics. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5712
  • Kissane, B. (2000). Technology and the curriculum: The case of the graphics calculator. Paper presented at the An International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Education, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Kor, L. K., & Lim, C. S. (2003). Learning statistics with graphic calculator: A case study. Paper presented at the Proceedins of 1st National Conference on Graphing Calculators, Penang, Malaysia.
  • Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1998). Assessing reasoning and problem solving: A sourcebook for elementary school teachers. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Kutzler, B. (2000). The Algebraic Calculator as a Pedagogical Tool for Teaching Mathematics. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 5-23.
  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. London: RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203304846
  • Mayer, R. (1982). The psychology of mathematical problem solving. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 1-13). Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.
  • Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, R. C. (2006). Problem solving. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 287–304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Newman, A. (1983). The Newman Language of Mathematics Kit: Strategies for diagnosis and remediation: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Ng, W. L. (2011). Using an advanced graphing calculator in the teaching and learning of calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 925-938. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.616914
  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving (Vol. V): OECD Publishing.
  • Pilipczuk, C. H. (2006). The effect of graphing technology on students’ understanding of functions in a precalculus course. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305324162?accountid=28930
  • Polya, G. (1965). Mathematical discovery. On understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving. New York: John Wiley.
  • Quinones, C. K. (2005). The Effects of Journal Writing on Student Attitudes and Performance in Problem Solving. (Master of Education in K-8 Mathematics and Science), University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
  • Rich, B. S. (1991). The effect of the use of graphing calculators on the learning of function concepts in precalculus mathematics. (9112475 Ph.D.), The University of Iowa, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/303868313?accountid=28930 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
  • Rosli, R., Goldsby, D., & Capraro, M. M. (2013). Assessing Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving and Problem-Posing Skills Asian Social Science, 9(16), 7. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p54
  • Schrupp, R. D. (2007). Effects of using graphing calculators to solve quadratics with high school mathematics students. (1443824 M.S.E.), Southwest Minnesota State University, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304705471?accountid=28930 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database.
  • Szetela, W., & Super, D. (1987). Calculators and instruction in problem solving in grade 7. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.2307/749058
  • Tambychik, T. (2005). Penggunaan Kaedah Nemonik Berirama dalam Pembelajaran Matematik bagi Pelajar Lemah: Satu Kajian kes. (Master Degree), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
  • Tambychik, T., Meerah, T. S. M., & Aziz, Z. (2010). Mathematics skills difficulties: A mixture of intricacies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C)(2010), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.025
  • Tan, C.-K., Harji, M. B., & Lau, S.-H. (2011). Graphing calculator for probability students: How was it perceived? IBIMA Business Review 2011(2011). https://doi.org/10.5171/2011.167702
  • Tay, L. H. (2005). Problem Solving Abilities and Strategies in Solving Multistep Mathematical Problems among Form 2 Students. (Master Degree), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Victor, A. M. (2004). The effects of metacognitive instruction on the planning and academic achievement of first and second grade children. (Doctoral), Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago.
  • Waits, B. K., & Demana, F. (1998). The role of graphing calculators in mathematics reform.
  • Wareham, K. (2016). Calculators and Mathematics Achievement: What the NAEP Mathematics Results Tell Us. Paper presented on Jan. 3 at the (14th) 2016 Hawaii International Conference On Education. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  • Wilson, J. W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical Probelm Solving. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research Ideas for the Classroom: High School Mathematics. New York: MacMillan.
  • Wittcop, M. A. (2008). The Effects of Problem Solving Strategy Instruction, Journal Writing and Discourse on 6th Grade Advanced Mathematics Student Performance. (Master of Education), University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
  • Yeo, K. K. J. (2011). An Exploratory Study of Primary Two Pupils’ Approach to Solve Word Problems. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 9.
  • Zanzali, N. A. A., & Lui, L. N. (1999). Evaluating the levels of problem solving abilities in mathematics. Research Management Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Retrieved from http://math.unipa.it/~grim/Jzanzalinam.pdf

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2019