International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

Fourth to Sixth Grade Teachers’ Invented Real World Problems and Pictorial Representations for Fraction Division
AMA 10th edition
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Stohlmann M, Yang Y, Huang X, Olson T. Fourth to Sixth Grade Teachers’ Invented Real World Problems and Pictorial Representations for Fraction Division. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1), em0557. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5939
APA 6th edition
In-text citation: (Stohlmann et al., 2020)
Reference: Stohlmann, M., Yang, Y., Huang, X., & Olson, T. (2020). Fourth to Sixth Grade Teachers’ Invented Real World Problems and Pictorial Representations for Fraction Division. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0557. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5939
Chicago
In-text citation: (Stohlmann et al., 2020)
Reference: Stohlmann, Micah, Yichen Yang, Xing Huang, and Travis Olson. "Fourth to Sixth Grade Teachers’ Invented Real World Problems and Pictorial Representations for Fraction Division". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2020 15 no. 1 (2020): em0557. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5939
Harvard
In-text citation: (Stohlmann et al., 2020)
Reference: Stohlmann, M., Yang, Y., Huang, X., and Olson, T. (2020). Fourth to Sixth Grade Teachers’ Invented Real World Problems and Pictorial Representations for Fraction Division. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), em0557. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5939
MLA
In-text citation: (Stohlmann et al., 2020)
Reference: Stohlmann, Micah et al. "Fourth to Sixth Grade Teachers’ Invented Real World Problems and Pictorial Representations for Fraction Division". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 15, no. 1, 2020, em0557. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5939
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Stohlmann M, Yang Y, Huang X, Olson T. Fourth to Sixth Grade Teachers’ Invented Real World Problems and Pictorial Representations for Fraction Division. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2020;15(1):em0557. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5939

Abstract

Teaching fraction operations for conceptual understanding is a challenging task. For the topic of fraction division especially, teachers need support because teachers find this difficult to teach and elementary and middle school students struggle to learn this concept. Well-structured professional development can assist teachers in exploring their own understanding as well as how to incorporate multiple representations in their instruction. This naturalistic inquiry study investigated fourth to sixth grade teachers’ invented real-world problems and pictorial representations for fraction division. The teachers completed a written assessment focused on conceptual understanding of fraction operations through multiple representations at the beginning and conclusion of a weeklong professional development experience. The questions on the assessment were taken or modified from prior research studies. The results in this paper focus specifically on a task in which the teachers had to develop a real world story problem for 2½ ÷ ¾ and solve the problem by drawing a pictorial representation. The teachers showed statistically significant improvement on developing appropriate real-world problems and using pictorial representations to solve their problems. Implications for teachers’ usage of multiple representations are discussed along with needed structures for professional development targeted on fractions.

References

  • Ball, D. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132-144. https://doi.org/10.2307/749140
  • Ball, D., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). (pp. 433-456). New York: Macmillan.
  • Behr, M., Wachsmuth, I., Post, T. R., & Lesh, R. (1984). Order and equivalence of rational numbers: A clinical teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(5), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/748423
  • Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C., Underhill, R., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novices and their instructors give up too easily? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 194-222. https://doi.org/10.2307/749118
  • Bruner, J. (1966). On cognitive growth. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Oliver, & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth: A collaboration at the Center for Cognitive Studies (pp. 1–67). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207596608247117
  • Carbone, R. (2009). Elementary teacher candidates’ understanding of rational numbers: An international perspective. In L. Paditz & A. Rogerson (Eds.), Proceedings of the mathematics in 21st century project 11th international conference. (pp. 101-105). Dresden, Germany.
  • Chen, X., & Li, Y. (2010). Instructional coherence in chinese mathematics classroom-A case study of lessons on fraction division. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 711-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9182-y
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108324688
  • Cramer, K., Ahrendt, S., Monson, D., Wyberg, T., & Miller, C. (2017). Making sense of third-grade students’ misunderstandings of the number line. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 9(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2016.1245035
  • Cramer, K., Monson, D., Whitney, S., Leavitt, S., & Wyberg, T. (2010). Dividing fractions and problem solving: Reflect and discuss. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(6), 338-346.
  • Cramer, K., Post, T., & delMas, R. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth-and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.2307/749646
  • Desimone, L., Porter, A., Garet, M., Yoon, K., & Birman, B. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081
  • Empson, S. B. (1995). Using sharing situations to help children learn fractions. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2(2), 110–114.
  • Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley.
  • Fuson, K., & Murata, A. (2007). Integrating NRC principles and the NCTM process standards to form a class learning path model that individualizes within whole-class activities. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 10(1), 72–91.
  • Fuson, K., Kalchman, M., & Bransford, J. (2005). Mathematical understanding: An introduction. In M. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. (pp. 217-256). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  • Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
  • Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 276–295). New York: Macmillan
  • Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Integrating Mathematics and Pedagogy (2004). IMAP Web-Based Beliefs-Survey manual. San Diego, CA: Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, San Diego State University. Retrieved from http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/CRMSE/IMAP/pubs.html
  • Jacobson, E., & Izsák, A. (2015). Knowledge and motivation as mediators in mathematics teaching practice: the case of drawn models for fraction arithmetic. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(5), 467-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9320-0
  • Kaput, J. (1987). Representation systems and mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 19–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lamon, S. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Towards a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629–667). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
  • Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  • Lesh, R. (1979). Mathematical learning disabilities: Considerations for identification, diagnosis and remediation. In R. Lesh, D. Mierkiewicz, & M. G. Kantowski (Eds.), Applied mathematical problem solving. Ohio: ERIC/SMEAC.
  • Leung, I. K., & Carbone, R. E. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge about fraction division reflected through problem posing. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1&2), 80-92.
  • Li, Y. (2008). What do students need to learn about division of fractions? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(9), 546–552.
  • Li, Y., & Huang, R. (2008). Chinese elementary mathematics teachers’ knowledge in mathematics and pedagogy for teaching: The case of fraction division. ZDM, 40(5), 845-859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0134-8
  • Li, Y., & Kulm, G. (2008). Knowledge and confidence of pre-service mathematics teachers: the case of fraction division. ZDM—The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 40(5), 833-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0148-2
  • Lo, J., & Luo, F. (2012). Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of fraction division. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(6), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9221-4
  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mack, N. (1995). Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 422-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/749431
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014). Principles to action. Reston, VA: Author.
  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). The foundations for success. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf.
  • National Research Council (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.
  • Nillas, L. (2003). Division of fractions: Preservice teachers’ understanding and use of problem solving strategies. The Mathematics Educator, 7(2), 96-113.
  • Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Payne, J. (1976). Review of research on fractions. In R. Lesh (Ed.), Number and measurement (pp. 145-188). Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
  • Pett, M. (1997). Nonparametric statistics for health care research: Statistics for small samples and unusual distributions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Philipp, R. & Hawthorne, C. (2015). Unpacking referent units in fraction operations. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(4), 240-247. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.22.4.0240
  • Shin, J. (2010). Construction of a student-generated algorithm for fraction measurement division. Journal of Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 439-454.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Siegler, R., Duncan, G., Davis-Kean, P., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., et al. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 691-697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101
  • Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/749817
  • Van de Walle, J. A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.