International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
Factors that Impact Preservice Teachers’ Growth in Conceptual Mathematical Knowledge During a Mathematics Methods Course
APA
In-text citation: (Zerpa et al., 2009)
Reference: Zerpa, C., Kajander, A., & Barneveld, C. V. (2009). Factors that Impact Preservice Teachers’ Growth in Conceptual Mathematical Knowledge During a Mathematics Methods Course. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/230
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Zerpa C, Kajander A, Barneveld CV. Factors that Impact Preservice Teachers’ Growth in Conceptual Mathematical Knowledge During a Mathematics Methods Course. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2009;4(2), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/230
Chicago
In-text citation: (Zerpa et al., 2009)
Reference: Zerpa, Carlos, Ann Kajander, and Christina Van Barneveld. "Factors that Impact Preservice Teachers’ Growth in Conceptual Mathematical Knowledge During a Mathematics Methods Course". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2009 4 no. 2 (2009): 57-76. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/230
Harvard
In-text citation: (Zerpa et al., 2009)
Reference: Zerpa, C., Kajander, A., and Barneveld, C. V. (2009). Factors that Impact Preservice Teachers’ Growth in Conceptual Mathematical Knowledge During a Mathematics Methods Course. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), pp. 57-76. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/230
MLA
In-text citation: (Zerpa et al., 2009)
Reference: Zerpa, Carlos et al. "Factors that Impact Preservice Teachers’ Growth in Conceptual Mathematical Knowledge During a Mathematics Methods Course". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 4, no. 2, 2009, pp. 57-76. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/230
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Zerpa C, Kajander A, Barneveld CV. Factors that Impact Preservice Teachers’ Growth in Conceptual Mathematical Knowledge During a Mathematics Methods Course. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2009;4(2):57-76. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/230

Abstract

Teachers’ conceptual understanding of elementary mathematics is believed to be fundamental to effective classroom level mathematics reform. This study examined preservice teachers’ change in conceptual mathematical knowledge after taking a reform-based mathematics methods course as part of a teacher certification program, and investigated the relationship between this change and factors such as preservice teachers’ academic background, initial levels of conceptual and procedural mathematical knowledge and values, and the number of mathematics courses taken in high school and university. The results of this study suggest that the number of mathematics courses taken in high school may influence growth in conceptual mathematical knowledge, while preservice teachers’ subject-area background and the number of university mathematics courses taken did not appear to influence growth in conceptual mathematical knowledge as needed to teach in a reform-based manner.

References

  • Ambrose, R. (2004). Integrating change in prospective elementary school teachers’ orientations to mathematics teaching by building on beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 91-119.
  • Ahmed, A. (1987). Better Mathematics: A Curriculum Development Study. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.
  • Ball, D. L. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132-144.
  • Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373-397.
  • Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we know and what we think we know. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 500-508.
  • Ball, D. L., & Rowan, B. (2004). Introduction: Measuring instruction. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 3-10.
  • Bishop, A., Clark, B., Corrigan, D., & Gunstone, D. (2006). Values in mathematics and science education: Researchers’ and teachers’ views on the similarities and differences. International Journal of Mathematics Education, 26(1), 7-11.
  • Boaler, J. (1999). Participation, knowledge and beliefs: A community perspective on mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 259-281.
  • Bosse, M. J. (1998). Reforming the NCTM standards in light of historical perspective: Premature changes. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 17(3), 317-327.
  • Boyd, P. C. (1994). Professional school reform and public schools renewal: Portrait of a partnership. Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 132-139.
  • Cardelle-Elawar, M. (1995). Effects of metacognitive instruction on low achievers in mathematics problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 81-95.
  • Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Earl, L., & Southerland, S. (2003). Student engagement in times of turbulent change. McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 329-343.
  • Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33.
  • Fennema, E., Franke, M., & Carpenter, T. (1993). Using children’s mathematical knowledge in instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 555-583.
  • Foss, D. (2000). Conceptions of mathematics teaching and learning: Middle level and secondary preservice teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Freund, J. E. (1999). Mathematical Statistics (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Greenwald, R., Hedges, L.V & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of the school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research. 66(3), 361-396.
  • Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM standards. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 3-19.
  • Hiebert, J., Stigler, J., Jacobs, J., Givvin, K., Garnier, H., Smith, M., Hollingsworth, H., Manaster, A., Wearne, D., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Mathematics teaching in the United States today and tomorrow: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 111-132.
  • Hill, H., & Ball, D. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351.
  • Hill, H.C., Schilling, S.G & Ball, D.L. (2005). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal. 105(1), 11-30.
  • Hill, H., Sleep, L., Lewis, J., & Ball, D (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 111-220). Charlotte, NC: IAP.
  • Hill, H., Rowan, B & Ball, D.L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal. 42(2), 371-406.
  • Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1- 28.
  • Johnson, M. H., & Munakata, Y. (2005). Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(3), 152-188.
  • Kajander, A., & Lovric, M. (2005). Transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics: McMaster University experience. International Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology, 36(2-3), 149-160.
  • Kajander, A. (2005). Moving towards a conceptual understanding in the preservice classroom: A study of learning fractions. Proceedings of the Teacher Education for the Schools We Need Conference, University of Toronto.
  • Kajander, A. (2007). Unpacking mathematics for teaching: A study of preservice elementary teachers' evolving mathematical understandings and beliefs. Journal of Teaching and Learning. 5(1), pp. 33-54.
  • Kajander, A., Keene, A.J., Siddo, R. & Zerpa, C. (2006). Effects of Professional Development on Intermediate Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs Related to Mathematics. Final Report of the PRISM-NWO Project. Lakehead University: Ontario Ministry of Education.
  • Kajander, A., & Zerpa, C. (in review). Supporting the growth of preservice teachers: Examining mathematical knowledge and beliefs.
  • Linn, R. L. (1989). Educational Measurement (3rd Ed.). New York: National Council on Measurement on Education and American Council on Education.
  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Mundry, L. (2005). What experience has taught us about professional development. National Network of Eisenhower Regional Consortia and Clearinghouse.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2007). Principals and Standards for School Mathematics. Retrieved October 15, 2007, from http://standards.nctm.org.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principals and Standards for School Mathematics. Retrieved August 8, 2006, from http://standards.nctm.org.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1990). Teaching and Learning Mathematics in the 1990s: 1990 Yearbook (Thomas J. Cooney). Reston,Va.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). The Significance of the NCTM Standards to the Pathway Critical Issues in Mathematics. Retrieved March 20, 2006 from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/mathematical/ma0.htm.
  • Romberg, T. (1997). The influence of programs from other countries on the school of mathematics reform curricula in the United States. American Journal of Education, 106, 127-147.
  • Ross, J., Haimes, D., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1996). Improving student helpfulness in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 31(2), 13-24.
  • Ross, J., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & McDougall, D. (2002). Research on reform in mathematics education, 1993-2000. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 122-130
  • Senger, E.S. (1998). Examining teacher and classroom support for student invention. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North America, 20, 234-243.
  • Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 157-199). Charlotte, NC: IAP.
  • Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O., & Hutter, R. (2005). Epistemological beliefs, mathematics problem solving beliefs, and academic performance of middle school students. The Elementary School Journal. 105(3), 289-303.
  • Smith, M.S. (2000). Balancing old and new: An experienced middle teacher’s learning in the context of mathematics instructional reform. Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 352-376.
  • Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319-363). Charlotte, NC: IAP.
  • Stipek, D., Givvin, K., Salmon, J. & MacGyvers, V. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213-226.
  • Villasenor, A., & Kepner, H. (1993). Arithmetic from a problem-solving perspective: An urban implementation. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 62-69.
  • Zerpa, C. (2008). The development of junior intermediate preservice teachers’ mathematical knowledge and values. Unpublished master’s thesis. Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.