Dismantling the ‘All-Boys Club’ A Narrative of Contradictions Women Experience in PhD Mathematics Programs: A Freirean Approach

Weverton Ataide Pinheiro

doi:10.29333/iejme/11090

Full Text (PDF)

Weverton Ataide Pinheiro ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Indiana University Bloomington, USA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Gender issues in mathematics education received fairly attention several decades ago, mainly because women and men performed differently, with men usually outperforming women. The research on such phenomena originated a series of studies on the so-called ‘achievement-gap.’ After many years of research on the achievement gap, such a gap has shown to have disappeared. However, recent studies have shown that there are fewer women who choose STEM-related fields than male peers. Suppose women are not choosing mathematics, but concomitantly research has pointed out that women and men have similar mathematics capabilities; why are women disproportionately part of the field? Since current statistics show that 90-95% of doctoral mathematics students are men, this study examines why school mathematics is still a male-dominant field. The data presented in this paper was collected using life-story interviews. Freirean methodology was used to analyze the contradictions in women’s PhD student experiences. The findings point to contradictions in women’s experiences in mathematics regarding success and challenges women have faced in mathematics and are discussed in depth in the findings and discussion sections of this paper.

Keywords

women in mathematics
gender and mathematics
mathematics education
contradictions

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INT ELECT J MATH ED, 2021, Volume 16, Issue 3, Article No: em0652

https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11090

Publication date: 18 Jul 2021

Article Views: 2491

Article Downloads: 910

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Ahlqvist, S., London, B., & Rosenthal, L. (2013). Unstable identity compatibility: How gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1644-1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476048
Bancroft, A., Bratter, J., & Rowley, K. (2017). Affirmation effects on math scores: The importance of high school track. Social Science Research, 64, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.10.001
Boaler, J. (2000). Mathematics from another world: Traditional communities and the alienation of learners. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(00)00026-2
Braathe, H. J., & Solomon, Y. (2015). Choosing mathematics: the narrative of the self as a site of agency. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 151-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9585-8
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499627
Chauí, M. (1980). O que é Ideologia? Brasiliense.
Chronaki, A., & Pechtelidis, Y. (2012). ‘Being Good’ at Maths: fabricating Gender Subjectivity. REDIMAT-Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(3), 246-277. https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2012.14
Cimpian, J. R., Lubienski, S. T., Timmer, J. D., Makowski, M. B., & Miller, E. K. (2016). Have gender gaps in math closed? Achievement, teacher perceptions, and learning behaviors across two ECLS-K cohorts. AERA Open, 2(4), 2332858416673617. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673617
Corbett, C., & Hill, C. (2012). Graduating to a pay gap: The earnings of women and men one yearafter college graduation. American Association of University Women.
Damarin, S. K. (2000). The mathematically able as a marked category. Gender and Education, 12(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250020418
Damarin, S., & Erchick, D. B. (2010). Toward clarifying the meanings of gender in mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 310-323. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.4.0310
Esmonde, I. (2011). Snips and snails and puppy dogs’tails: genderism and mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/41319563
Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288-315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American educational research journal, 14(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312014001051
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. W. (1998). A longitudinal study of gender differences in young children’s mathematical thinking. Educational researcher, 27(5), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027005006
Fields medal. (n.d.). https://www.mathunion.org/imu-awards/fields-medal
Freire, P. (1970/2017). Pedagogia do oprimido (64th ed.). Paz & Terra.
Gholson, M. L. (2016). Clean corners and algebra: a critical examination of the constructed invisibility of black girls and women in mathematics. The Journal of Negro Education, 85(3), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.85.3.0290
Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(4), 700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659
Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2-3), 145-187. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_4
Gutiérrez, R. (2017). Why mathematics (Education) was late to the backlash party: the need for a revolution. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 10(2), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v10i2a347
Hall, J., & Suurtamm, C. (2018). Behind the ‘Success Story’: exploring the Experiences of a Woman Mathematics Major. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(4), 342-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0032-1
Herzig, A. H. (2004). Becoming mathematicians: women and students of color choosing and leaving doctoral mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 171-214. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074002171
Herzig, A. H. (2010). Women belonging in the social worlds of graduate mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 7(2), 177-208. Available at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol7/iss2/2
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
Johnson, D. R. (2011). Women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(152), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.410
Kaiser, G. & Rogers, P. (1995). Introduction: equity in mathematics education. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: influences of feminism and culture (pp. 1-10). The Falmer Press.
Kessel, C. (2014). Understanding underrepresentation: Women in mathematics and other fields. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 36(4), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-013-9441-1
Leyva, L. (2017). Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: A review of research on gender in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 397–452. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0397
Lubienski, S. T., & Ganley, C. M. (2017). Research on gender and mathematics. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 649–666). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lubienski, S. T., Robinson, J. P., Crane, C. C., & Ganley, C. M. (2013). Girls’ and boys’ mathematics achievement, affect, and experiences: Findings from ECLS-K. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 634-645. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.4.0634
Lubienski, S., & Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2020). Gender and Mathematics: what can other disciplines tell us? What is our role? Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 13, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v13i1a377
Man-Keung, S. (2000). The ABCD of using history of mathematics in the (undergraduate) classroom. Paleontological Society Papers, 6, 3-10.
May, V. M. (2015). Pursuing intersectionality, unsettling dominant imaginaries. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203141991
McAdams, D. P. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 241–261). Guilford Press.
Mendick, H. (2003). Choosing maths/doing gender: A look at why there are more boys than girls in advanced mathematics classes in England. In L. Burton (Ed.), Which way social justice in mathematics education? (pp. 169-187). Praeger.
Mendick, H. (2005a). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing ‘good at maths’. Gender and education, 17(2), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025042000301465
Mendick, H. (2005b). Mathematical stories: why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS‐level in England? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000294192
Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Open University Press.
Mohanty, C. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist review, 30(1), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/1395054
National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2021). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2021. NSF 21-321. Alexandria, VA. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/report/field-of-degree-women
National Science Foundation, National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators: 2018. Report NSB-2018-1. Alexandria, VA. https://nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report
Renold, E., & Allan, A. (2006). Bright and beautiful: high achieving girls, ambivalent femininities, and the feminization of success in the primary school. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 27(4), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300600988606
Rodd, M., & Bartholomew, H. (2006). Invisible and special: Young women’s experiences as undergraduate mathematics students. Gender and Education, 18(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500195093
Rubel, L. H., & Ehrenfeld, N. (2020). Palestinian/Arab Israeli women’s experiences in mathematics education: An intersectional analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101616
Rudrappa, S. (2015). Discounted life: The price of global surrogacy in India. NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479874521.001.0001
Ryan, C. (2012). Field of degree and earnings by selected employment characteristics: 2011.U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2012/acs/acsbr11-10.pdf
Solomon, Y. (2007). Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in undergraduate mathematics? Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601099473
Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1-2), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9384-z
Solomon, Y., Radovic, D., & Black, L. (2016). ‘I can actually be very feminine here’: contradiction and hybridity in becoming a female mathematician. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(1), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9649-4
Stedall, J. (2012). The history of mathematics: A very short introduction (Vol. 305). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199599684.001.0001
Steele, J. R., Reisz, L., Williams, A., & Kawakami, K. (2007). Women in mathematics: Examining the hidden barriers that gender stereotypes can impose. Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers, 159-183. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847206879.00017
Thomas, D. R. (2003). A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Walker, E. N. (2012). Cultivating mathematics identities in and out of school and in between. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 5(1), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v5i1a173
Walls, F. (2008). Girls, mathematics and the gendered construction of mathematical (dis)ability. Paper presented at the PME. http://www.pme32na30.org.mx/ws1/Gender%20and%20Mathematics%20book%20Abstract-walls.pdf
Walls, F. (2009). Mathematical subjects: Children talk about their mathematics lives. Springer.
Yeh, C., & Rubel, L. (2020). Queering mathematics: Disrupting binary oppositions in mathematics pre-service teacher education. In N. Radakovic & L. Jao (Eds.), Borders in mathematics pre-service teacher education (pp. 227-243). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44292-7_11

How to cite this article

APA

Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2021). Dismantling the ‘All-Boys Club’ A Narrative of Contradictions Women Experience in PhD Mathematics Programs: A Freirean Approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0652. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11090

Vancouver

Ataide Pinheiro W. Dismantling the ‘All-Boys Club’ A Narrative of Contradictions Women Experience in PhD Mathematics Programs: A Freirean Approach. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2021;16(3):em0652. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11090

AMA

Ataide Pinheiro W. Dismantling the ‘All-Boys Club’ A Narrative of Contradictions Women Experience in PhD Mathematics Programs: A Freirean Approach. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2021;16(3), em0652. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11090

Chicago

Ataide Pinheiro, Weverton. "Dismantling the ‘All-Boys Club’ A Narrative of Contradictions Women Experience in PhD Mathematics Programs: A Freirean Approach". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2021 16 no. 3 (2021): em0652. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11090

Harvard

Ataide Pinheiro, W. (2021). Dismantling the ‘All-Boys Club’ A Narrative of Contradictions Women Experience in PhD Mathematics Programs: A Freirean Approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0652. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11090

MLA

Ataide Pinheiro, Weverton "Dismantling the ‘All-Boys Club’ A Narrative of Contradictions Women Experience in PhD Mathematics Programs: A Freirean Approach". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 16, no. 3, 2021, em0652. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11090