The relevance of the studied problem is caused by the fact that now the creation need of transparent and objective models and mechanisms of educational quality assessment of the organizations with participation of professional communities, public organizations, and other interested parties is realized. The purpose of the publication consists in the model development of quality assessment of s scientific and educational network performance in the form of external audit. The system approach connected with representation, studying and designing of object as systems, sets of its interconnected structural and functional components, including in relation to research of the pedagogical phenomena and systems acts as the leading approach to research of this problem. The model of quality assessment of the scientific and educational network performance in the form of external audit is presented. Materials of the article can be useful while carrying out an independent assessment of current state and dynamics definition of the development of participants’ activity of network interaction (conditions, processes, results).

• Bolotov, V. A. & Efremova N. F. (2007) Systems of education quality assessment. Moscow: Logos. 192p.
• Davydova, N. N. (2013) Implementing the Systematic Synergetic Approach in Management Practices Related to the Research and Education Network Development. The Education and Science journal, 7, 67-85.
• Dmitrieva, E. A. (2015) Concerning the Networking Interaction Experience of Teachers and Students of Pedagogical University. The Education and Science journal, 6, 77 - 88.
• Dorozhkin, E. M., Davydova, N. N. (2013) The Development of Educational Institutions in the Course of Networking. Higher Education in Russia, 11, 11-17.
• Fedorov, V. A. & Davydova, N. N. (2014) Control of the Research and Education Network Development in Modern Socio Pedagogical Conditions. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, 2, 126-133.
• Horokhordin, N. N. (2006) Methodology of Internal Audit in the Organization. Audit Journal, 6, 15-21.
• Kaplan, R. & Norton, D, (2008) Balanced scorecard. From strategy to action. Moscow: Olympus-Business. 214p.
• Korotkov, E. M. (2007) Education quality management. Moscow: Academic Project. 320p.
• Medvedenko, N. V. & Rubtsov, S. Yu. (2008) Assessment and its Interrelation with Control, Measurement and Diagnostics in Education Quality Management. Standards and Monitoring in Education, 2, 19 – 22.
• Potashnik, M. M. (2002) Quality of education: Problems and technologies of management in questions and answers. Moscow: Pedagogical Society of Russia. 224p.
• Silkina, N. V. & Vaganova, N. J. (2015) Special Features of the Educational Environment through the Net Interaction of Education and Production. The Education and Science journal, 6, 63-76.
• Subetto, A. I. (2000) Quality of Education: Problems of Assessment and Monitoring. Education, 2, 62-66.
• Zagvyazinsky, V. I., Zakirova, A. F. & Strokova, T. A. (2008) Pedagogical dictionary. Moscow: Academy. 352p.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.