International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education

International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education
Didactical Conceptualization of Dynamic Mathematical Approaches: Example Analysis from the InnoMathEd Program
APA
In-text citation: (Ruthven & Lavicza, 2011)
Reference: Ruthven, K., & Lavicza, Z. (2011). Didactical Conceptualization of Dynamic Mathematical Approaches: Example Analysis from the InnoMathEd Program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/263
AMA
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ruthven K, Lavicza Z. Didactical Conceptualization of Dynamic Mathematical Approaches: Example Analysis from the InnoMathEd Program. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2011;6(2), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/263
Chicago
In-text citation: (Ruthven and Lavicza, 2011)
Reference: Ruthven, Kenneth, and Zsolt Lavicza. "Didactical Conceptualization of Dynamic Mathematical Approaches: Example Analysis from the InnoMathEd Program". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2011 6 no. 2 (2011): 89-110. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/263
Harvard
In-text citation: (Ruthven and Lavicza, 2011)
Reference: Ruthven, K., and Lavicza, Z. (2011). Didactical Conceptualization of Dynamic Mathematical Approaches: Example Analysis from the InnoMathEd Program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), pp. 89-110. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/263
MLA
In-text citation: (Ruthven and Lavicza, 2011)
Reference: Ruthven, Kenneth et al. "Didactical Conceptualization of Dynamic Mathematical Approaches: Example Analysis from the InnoMathEd Program". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 6, no. 2, 2011, pp. 89-110. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/263
Vancouver
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ruthven K, Lavicza Z. Didactical Conceptualization of Dynamic Mathematical Approaches: Example Analysis from the InnoMathEd Program. INT ELECT J MATH ED. 2011;6(2):89-110. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/263

Abstract

This paper examines examples of teaching approaches involving the use of dynamic mathematics software. These were nominated as successful approaches by four organizations participating in the InnoMathEd professional development program. The most common type of task reasoning structure was one which required students to quantitatively formulate a mathematical relationship expressed by a visual representation. The examples nominated by most of the organizations reflected a more didactic, guided-discovery orientation grounded in directed action, but those from one organization reflected a more adidactic, problem-solving orientation grounded in constrained solution. Instrumental demands on students varied substantially between examples, calling for very different levels of preparation and guidance. The core idea behind these dynamic approaches was one of manipulating displayed representations so as to highlight associated variation (or non-variation) of properties, and relations between different states or representations. Employing this type of user interaction to support visualization and observation was seen as creating a learning environment that encourages exploration and experimentation through which mathematical properties and relationships can be discovered.

References

---

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.