This article aims at revealing the basic principles and conditions for the preparation of a reflective teacher in classical university. On the basis of theoretical research, analysis of psychological and educational literature and great educational experience, the fundamental principles of preparation of students as future professional reflective teachers are revealed. The article deals with the theoretical and methodological basis of the current reseatch, presents the main arguments for the training of a future reflective teacher in a classical university. The paper discusses the feasibility of conditions based on the integration of the principles presented in various forms of active learning (i.e. business games, design, problem solving, microcharacterization, workshops, discuyive lectures, lectures-dialogues and practice throughout the learning process, etc.). Also forms of activity and simulation of various types of social interaction were studied. The ability to develop a criterial restructuring of activity is provided and the way to self-cognition and self-development is opened.

• Andreev, V. I. (2000) Pedagogy: Training module for creative self-development. Kazan: Center for Innovative Technologies. 600p.
• Biktagirova, G. F., Utemov V. V. & Khitryuk V. V.(2016) The Model of Realization of the Main Professional Educational Curricular for Training Middle Level Specialists. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11 (5), 907-914.
• Biktagirova, G. F. & Valeeva R. A. (2014) Development of the teachers' pedagogical reflection. Life Science Journal, 11(9s), 60-63.
• Biktagirova, G. F. & Valeeva,  R. A. (2013) Technological Approach to the Reflection Development of Future Engineers/ Interactive Collaborative Learning. 2013 International Conference on.2013, 9(25), 427-428.
• Bondarevskaya, E. V. & Kulnevich, S. V.  (1999) Pedagogy: personality in humanistic theories and systems of education Rostov-on-Don: Uchitel. 560p.
• Bruschlinsky, A. V. & Polikarpov, V. A. (1988)  Dialogue in the process of cognition. Cognition and Communication. Moscow: Nauka, 60-72.
• Korzhuev, A. V. (2002) Reflection and critical thinking in the context of high education. Pedagogics, 1, 18-22.
• Kulyutkin, Ju. N. (1981) Reflective processes in teacher’s activity. Moscow: Pedagogics. 252p.
• Leontiev, D. A. (1996) Self-realization and ontological potency. Moscow: Pedagogics. 28p.
• Markova, A. K.  (1996) Psychology of professional competence.Moscow: Znanie. 192p.
• McLaughlin, Terence H. (1999) Beyond the Reflective Teacher, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31, 9–25.
• Richardson B. G.& Shupe M. J. (2006) The Importance of Teacher Self-Awareness in Working with Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Teaching Exceptional Children, 36 (2), 8-13.
• Rubinstein, S. L. (2007) Fundamentals of General Psychology. Saint Petersburg: Piter. 713p.
• Schon, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books. 355p.
• Schon, D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. 263p.
• Stepanov, S. Ju. & Semenov, I. N. (1985) Reflection psychology: problems and researches. Questions on psychology, 3, 29–36.
• Stepanov, S. Ju. (2000) Reflective practice of creative development of a person and organizations. Moscow: Nauka. 174p.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1982) Problems of general psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika, 360p.
• Yadov, V. A. (2009) Modern theoretical sociology as a conceptual base of Russian transformations research. Sankt Peterburg: Intersotsis. 13 p.
• Zeichner, K. & Liston, D. (1987) Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 23-49.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.